QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Diversity Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether diversity training changes real workplace behavior, not just satisfaction — covering relevance, confidence applying concepts, and inclusion climate. An AI follow-up interview digs into a specific moment participants applied (or struggled to apply) what they learned, for L&D and DEI teams evaluating training impact.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on the diversity training you attended. Your honest feedback shapes how we run future sessions — this will take about 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

Which format best describes the diversity training you attended?

  • Live in-person session
  • Live virtual session
  • Self-paced online module
  • Blended (self-paced plus live discussion)
  • Not sure
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

How relevant was the training content to situations you actually encounter at work?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not relevant at all最大:Extremely relevant
Q04
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about the training?

4行 × 5列
  • The facilitator(s) were knowledgeable and credible
  • I felt safe asking questions or sharing concerns
  • The examples used reflected real situations at our company
  • The pace allowed time to actually absorb the material
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

How confident are you in applying what you learned the next time a related situation comes up at work?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not confident at all最大:Extremely confident
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）

Across the topics covered, which were most and least valuable to you personally?

  • Recognizing unconscious bias
  • Inclusive communication and language
  • Being an active ally to colleagues
  • Addressing microaggressions in the moment
  • Equitable hiring and promotion practices
  • Understanding company policies on discrimination
  • Navigating disagreement across different backgrounds
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most valuable最も悪い:Least valuable
Q07
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how often have you noticed yourself doing something differently because of the training (e.g., rephrasing a comment, speaking up, changing a process)?

  • Not at all
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Regularly, it's become a habit
Q08
AIインタビュー

Get the respondent to walk through one specific, recent moment where they tried to apply something from the training — what the situation was, what they did or said, and how it landed. If they said they haven't applied anything, probe what got in the way (forgot, unclear how, felt awkward, no opportunity) and what would have made it easier to act on in real time.

Q09
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this training to a colleague in a similar role?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q10
自由回答（長文）

What's one change that would make future diversity training sessions more useful for you or your team?

Q11
選択式

Which best describes your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Senior leader / executive
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-9 years
  • 10+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your perspective! Responses are combined into an anonymized report used to improve upcoming diversity training sessions — individual answers are never shared with your manager.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond satisfaction scores to test real behavior change with a direct question on what respondents have actually done differently in the last 30 days
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to walk through one specific, recent moment where they tried to apply the training, surfacing concrete evidence instead of vague self-ratings
  • Uses a max-diff exercise to pinpoint which specific training topics were most and least valuable, giving L&D/DEI teams prioritized, actionable feedback rather than a single average score
  • Pairs a relevance and confidence rating with a matrix of agreement statements and role/tenure segmentation, so results can be broken down by who found the training most applicable

SurveySparrow

Diversity Training Survey Template

A ready-to-field template specifically aimed at diversity training feedback, so it's directly comparable in subject matter. It appears to rely on standard rating and open-text questions rather than any adaptive interviewing to probe how training translated into behavior. Good for quick satisfaction pulses but likely thinner on behavior-change evidence.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for diversity training rather than generic training feedback
  • Likely quick to deploy with SurveySparrow's conversational form format
  • Probably includes standard satisfaction and relevance rating questions

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific applied moment — likely fixed questions for every respondent
  • No visible mechanism for automated per-response quality scoring
  • No published methodology on how questions were chosen or scored

Jotform

Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form Template

A general-purpose training evaluation form, not specific to diversity training, so it would need heavy customization to match this use case. It's a static form builder template focused on form fields and layout rather than interview-style probing. Useful for basic post-training feedback collection at low complexity.

優れている点

  • Simple, familiar form format that's easy to customize and embed
  • Broadly applicable to many training types, not locked to one topic
  • Fast to set up for teams wanting basic post-training feedback

物足りない点

  • Generic training template, not tailored to diversity/inclusion-specific behavior change
  • Static form fields only — no adaptive follow-up questioning based on a respondent's answer
  • No automated scoring or auto-generated analysis report of responses

QuestionPro

Training Effectiveness Survey Questions | Post-Training Evaluation Sample Template

This page reads more like a sample question bank and guide for post-training evaluation than a single fielding-ready diversity training survey. It covers general training effectiveness concepts (relevance, satisfaction, application) applicable across training types, but isn't diversity-training-specific. Useful as reference material for building a survey manually rather than a plug-and-play instrument.

優れている点

  • Broad library of sample training-effectiveness questions to draw from
  • Covers general evaluation concepts like relevance, satisfaction, and application
  • Comes from an established survey platform with wider survey-logic features

物足りない点

  • Presented as a sample question guide rather than a ready-to-launch diversity training template
  • No adaptive AI interview to probe a specific real-world application moment
  • No automated quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology described

Typeform

Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form Template

A generic training effectiveness form, not specific to diversity training, built on Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time interface. It's a static template with fixed questions and no adaptive branching based on what a respondent actually experienced. Works well for lightweight, polished feedback collection but not for deep behavioral follow-up.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational one-at-a-time question flow that's pleasant to complete
  • Easy to customize branding and question wording
  • Widely used platform with solid basic analytics dashboards

物足りない点

  • Not diversity-training specific and lacks any behavior-change-focused questions like recent-application frequency
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to explore a specific moment of applying training
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated effectiveness report

よくあるご質問

「Diversity Training Program Effectiveness Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on the diversity training you attended. Your honest feedback shapes how we ru…」・「Which format best describes the diversity training you attended?」・「How relevant was the training content to situations you actually encounter at work?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

Distance Learning Weekly Check-In Survey

A short weekly pulse check for students learning remotely — covering engagement, workload, tech reliability, and connection to instructors. An AI follow-up interview digs into whatever obstacle the student flagged (tech, motivation, unclear instructions) to find out exactly what happened and what would help, instead of stopping at a checkbox.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Workplace Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Experience Survey

Measures how included, fairly treated, and heard employees feel across backgrounds, and prioritizes where DEI investment would have the most impact. An AI follow-up interview digs into specific belonging or fairness experiences behind the scores instead of leaving them as abstract ratings.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Workplace Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Climate Survey

Measures how included, respected, and fairly treated employees feel day-to-day — covering belonging, fairness in advancement, exposure to exclusionary behavior, and which DEI investments matter most. An AI follow-up interview turns the lowest-scoring signals into concrete, specific stories HR can act on. For HR and DEI teams running an annual or pulse climate check, about 8 minutes.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Employee Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether recent training actually changed what employees can do on the job — covering content quality, format preferences, and topic priorities — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasons behind low preparedness scores instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Train-the-Trainer Program Effectiveness Survey

Evaluates whether a train-the-trainer program actually builds facilitation skill and gets used back on the job — covering content relevance, confidence delivering sessions, and skill transfer. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real training session the respondent led afterward, not just their impression of the course.

テンプレートを見る