QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Employee & HR

Employee Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether recent training actually changed what employees can do on the job — covering content quality, format preferences, and topic priorities — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasons behind low preparedness scores instead of settling for a number.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your recent training experience! Your honest feedback shapes what we build or buy next. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

Which training program did you most recently complete? (Template note: replace with your organization's actual training program names before launching.)

  • (Replace with Training Program A)
  • (Replace with Training Program B)
  • (Replace with Training Program C)
  • Something else
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

How well did this training prepare you to perform the related job tasks?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Did not prepare me at all最大:Prepared me completely
Q04
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about the training you completed?

4行 × 5列
  • The content was relevant to my day-to-day work
  • The pace matched what I needed to learn
  • I had enough hands-on practice or examples
  • The materials were easy to reference afterward
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
選択式

In the last 12 months, which training formats have you found most useful for actually learning something? Select all that apply.

  • Live instructor-led sessions
  • Self-paced online modules
  • On-the-job shadowing or mentoring
  • Peer-led workshops
  • Written guides or documentation
  • Video walkthroughs
Q06
評価スケール

How would you rate the trainer or facilitator who led this session?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these training topics most needs more investment or improvement at our organization? (Template note: replace with topics relevant to your training catalog.)

  • (Replace with Compliance & Policy training)
  • (Replace with Technical/Systems skills)
  • (Replace with Leadership & Management skills)
  • (Replace with Customer-facing communication)
  • (Replace with New-hire onboarding)
  • (Replace with Safety procedures)
  • (Replace with Cross-team collaboration tools)
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Needs the most investment最も悪い:Needs the least investment
Q08
AIインタビュー

Probe the 'why' behind the respondent's preparedness rating for the training they completed. If they rated it low, get a specific example of a task they were unprepared for and what was missing (content, practice, follow-up support). If they rated it high, ask what specifically made it stick and whether they've actually applied it since. Anchor on concrete moments, not general impressions.

Q09
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this training to a colleague in a similar role?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q10
自由回答（長文）

Is there anything about the training that we haven't asked about but should know?

Q11
選択式

Which department are you part of?

  • (Replace with Department A)
  • (Replace with Department B)
  • (Replace with Department C)
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 1 year
  • 1 to 3 years
  • More than 3 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for the candid feedback! Your responses feed directly into how we prioritize and redesign training programs this year.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Pairs a numeric preparedness rating with an AI follow-up interview that actually probes the 'why' behind low scores, instead of stopping at a number like most static forms.
  • Combines a training-statement agreement matrix, trainer rating, and a max-diff exercise on topic priorities so you get both content quality feedback and clear investment priorities in one flow.
  • Captures format preferences (which training delivery methods actually worked) alongside effectiveness data, so the results can inform both content and delivery decisions.
  • Ends with an open-ended catch-all question plus department/tenure segmentation, letting you slice low-preparedness patterns by group without extra survey design work.

Jotform

Employee Training Information Form Template

This is primarily an information/intake form for capturing employee training details (course, dates, completion status) rather than an effectiveness-evaluation survey. It's a fielding-ready static form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop builder, but it's designed for record-keeping more than for measuring training impact. Teams wanting effectiveness data would need to substantially rebuild it.

優れている点

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's builder
  • Broad integration ecosystem typical of Jotform templates
  • Quick to deploy for basic training record capture

物足りない点

  • Static form fields with no adaptive follow-up questioning on low scores or open responses
  • Not purpose-built to measure training effectiveness or job impact, limiting relevance out of the box
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated analysis

QuestionPro

Employee Training Survey Questionnaire

A genuine, fielding-ready survey questionnaire aimed at evaluating employee training, likely covering satisfaction, content, and trainer ratings similar to standard survey-platform templates. It benefits from QuestionPro's broader survey analytics and reporting tools. It appears to be a static question set rather than one with dynamic, response-driven probing.

優れている点

  • Built on an established survey platform with analytics and reporting features
  • Question set likely covers common training evaluation dimensions (content, format, trainer)
  • Customizable within QuestionPro's survey builder

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into reasons behind low preparedness or satisfaction scores
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No disclosed automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

Typeform

Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form Template

A directly comparable, fielding-ready template explicitly focused on evaluating training effectiveness, delivered through Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time interface. It likely offers strong completion rates due to its UX design, but questioning logic is limited to predefined branching rather than true adaptive follow-up. It's a form, not an AI-moderated interview.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational UI known to improve completion rates
  • Explicitly framed around training effectiveness, matching survey intent
  • Supports basic conditional logic and branching

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI-generated follow-up questions that probe reasons behind specific scores
  • No voice interview or screen-share task capability
  • No automated response quality scoring or published prompt transparency

よくあるご質問

「Employee Training Program Effectiveness Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your recent training experience! Your honest feedback shapes what we build…」・「Which training program did you most recently complete? (Template note: replace with your organization's actual training…」・「How well did this training prepare you to perform the related job tasks?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Employee & HR

Employee Satisfaction and Retention Pulse Survey

Tracks overall staff satisfaction, satisfaction across key workplace dimensions, and early flight-risk signals, then uses an AI follow-up interview to uncover the specific reasons behind low scores or turnover intent. Built for HR and people teams running quarterly or annual pulse checks.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Train-the-Trainer Program Effectiveness Survey

Evaluates whether a train-the-trainer program actually builds facilitation skill and gets used back on the job — covering content relevance, confidence delivering sessions, and skill transfer. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real training session the respondent led afterward, not just their impression of the course.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Diversity Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether diversity training changes real workplace behavior, not just satisfaction — covering relevance, confidence applying concepts, and inclusion climate. An AI follow-up interview digs into a specific moment participants applied (or struggled to apply) what they learned, for L&D and DEI teams evaluating training impact.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Post-Training Session Feedback & Impact Survey

Captures how a training session landed — content quality, trainer effectiveness, and confidence applying new skills — for L&D teams and instructors. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind the recommendation score: what specifically helped or blocked people from using what they learned.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Employee Coaching Effectiveness Survey

Measures how often employees get coached, which manager behaviors actually land, and which coaching topics matter most to them — built for HR and people-development teams. The AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real recent coaching conversation to surface what's driving (or blocking) impact, instead of relying on generic satisfaction scores.

テンプレートを見る