すべてのテンプレート
Developer & Engineering

CRM Software Developer & Integration Experience Survey

Evaluates how engineers, sales-ops developers, and technical admins experience building on, customizing, and integrating with your CRM platform — covering API reliability, documentation, customization limits, and workflow tooling — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific integration blocker behind the ratings, not just general sentiment.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for jumping in! This is a quick survey about your hands-on experience building on, customizing, or integrating with your CRM platform. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. It's aimed at engineers, admins, and sales-ops folks who actually work under the hood — about 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

Which CRM platform do you primarily build on or integrate with day-to-day?

  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • Microsoft Dynamics 365
  • Zoho CRM
  • Pipedrive
  • (Replace with your organization's CRM if not listed)
Q03
数値必須

In the last 30 days, roughly how many hours did you spend writing custom code, configuring workflows, or building integrations for your CRM?

Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

Over the last 30 days, how reliable has the CRM's API been (consistent uptime, predictable responses, no unexplained failures)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unreliable最大:Extremely reliable
Q05
評価スケール必須

How would you rate the quality of the CRM's developer documentation (API reference, sample code, error explanations)?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q06
マトリクス必須

Rate the following technical aspects of the CRM platform:

6行 × 5列
  • Data model flexibility (custom objects and fields)
  • API rate limits for your use case
  • Webhook reliability
  • Sandbox or staging environment quality
  • Admin tools for building workflow automations
  • ほか1件
列: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q07
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how often has an API rate limit or integration error blocked your work?

  • Never
  • Once or twice
  • About weekly
  • Almost daily
Q08
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)必須

Which of these platform improvements would matter most to your work?

  • More generous API rate limits
  • More complete developer documentation
  • A modern API alternative to REST (e.g. GraphQL)
  • More flexible custom objects and fields
  • More reliable, well-documented webhooks
  • A full-featured sandbox or staging environment
  • Version control and rollback for automation workflows
  • More granular, role-based API permissions
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most valuable improvement最も悪い:Least valuable improvement
Q09
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the respondent's most recent frustrating experience integrating with or customizing their CRM: what they were trying to build, exactly where it broke or fell short (a rate limit, missing endpoint, flaky webhook, documentation gap), and how much time or workaround effort it cost. If they rated the API and documentation highly, instead probe for a workaround they've built to compensate for a platform limitation. Anchor on concrete specifics — error messages, endpoint names, or workflow steps — rather than general sentiment.

Q10
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this CRM platform to another engineering team as something worth building on?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q11
選択式

Which best describes your primary role?

  • Software engineer / developer
  • Sales or RevOps engineer
  • CRM administrator
  • IT / platform engineer
  • Other technical role
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

How many engineers or admins on your team regularly build on or maintain the CRM?

  • Just me
  • 2-5
  • 6-15
  • More than 15
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you! Your responses feed directly into a report on where CRM platforms create the most friction for the people who build on them, and what to fix first.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated multiple-choice question isolating how often API rate limits or integration errors actually blocked work in the last 30 days, not just general satisfaction
  • Pairs quantitative ratings (rating-scale on API reliability, rating on documentation quality, matrix on technical aspects) with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the respondent's most recent frustrating integration experience in their own words
  • Segments by role (engineer, sales-ops developer, technical admin) and team size, so integration pain can be analyzed by who's actually building on the CRM
  • Uses a best-worst trade-off to force-rank platform improvements, giving a prioritized roadmap signal instead of just a list of complaints

QuestionPro

20 Software Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is primarily an educational article listing sample software evaluation questions, with a generic template attached rather than a CRM-specific, ready-to-field survey. It targets general software buyers/users, not developers or integrators dealing with APIs, rate limits, or documentation quality specifically.

優れている点

  • Broad question bank covering general software usability and satisfaction
  • Backed by an established survey platform with standard distribution and reporting tools

物足りない点

  • Static question list with no adaptive follow-up to probe why a rating was given
  • Not tailored to developer/integration audiences (no API, docs, or rate-limit specific questions)
  • No transparent methodology or prompt-level detail since there's no AI component

SurveyMonkey

Software And App Customer Feedback | SurveyMonkey

A ready-to-use NPS-style feedback template for general software and app users, useful for broad customer sentiment tracking but not built for a technical, developer-facing audience. It measures overall satisfaction and likelihood to recommend rather than integration-specific friction like API reliability or documentation gaps.

優れている点

  • Fielding-ready NPS template with SurveyMonkey's established distribution and benchmarking tools
  • Simple, quick to deploy for general customer feedback

物足りない点

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into specific integration blockers
  • Not designed to capture technical detail (API uptime, rate limits, developer documentation quality)
  • No mechanism to reconstruct a specific recent frustrating technical experience

よくあるご質問

「CRM Software Developer & Integration Experience Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for jumping in! This is a quick survey about your hands-on experience building on, customizing, or integrating wi…」・「Which CRM platform do you primarily build on or integrate with day-to-day?」・「In the last 30 days, roughly how many hours did you spend writing custom code, configuring workflows, or building integr…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る