QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Product & UX

ICE Scoring: Roadmap Prioritization Assessment

Enables cross-functional stakeholders to evaluate roadmap initiatives on Impact, Confidence, and Ease dimensions, producing quantified ICE priority scores alongside qualitative risk and rationale data.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全31問・約13分
Q01
メッセージ

<p>Welcome to the Roadmap Prioritization Assessment.</p><p>You will evaluate four proposed initiatives on three dimensions: Impact, Confidence, and Ease (ICE). Your responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate to inform roadmap decisions.</p><p>There are no right or wrong answers—we value your honest assessment. Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. This survey should take approximately 10 minutes.</p><p><strong>Note to survey owner:</strong> Replace 'Bet A–D' labels with your actual initiative names before distributing.</p>

Q02
オピニオンスケール

How closely are you involved in roadmap planning decisions?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all involved最大:Deeply involved
Q03
オピニオンスケール

How familiar are you with Bet A?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all familiar最大:Extremely familiar
Q04
オピニオンスケール

How familiar are you with Bet B?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all familiar最大:Extremely familiar
Q05
オピニオンスケール

How familiar are you with Bet C?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all familiar最大:Extremely familiar
Q06
オピニオンスケール

How familiar are you with Bet D?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all familiar最大:Extremely familiar
Q07
ランク付け

Rank the following initiatives from highest to lowest priority for the next cycle.

  1. Bet A
  2. Bet B
  3. Bet C
  4. Bet D
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q08
自由回答（長文）

Is there anything else we should consider when sequencing or timing these initiatives?

Q09
選択式

What is your primary role?

  • Product Management
  • Engineering
  • Design/UX
  • Data/Analytics
  • Marketing
  • Sales
  • Customer Support/Success
  • Operations
  • Leadership/Executive
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
メッセージ

Thank you for your input. Your responses will be aggregated and used to inform roadmap prioritization for the upcoming cycle.

Q11
オピニオンスケール

Bet A — Impact: How much positive impact would this initiative have on our key metrics or strategic goals?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Negligible impact最大:Transformative impact
Q12
オピニオンスケール

Bet B — Impact: How much positive impact would this initiative have on our key metrics or strategic goals?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Negligible impact最大:Transformative impact
Q13
オピニオンスケール

Bet C — Impact: How much positive impact would this initiative have on our key metrics or strategic goals?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Negligible impact最大:Transformative impact
Q14
オピニオンスケール

Bet D — Impact: How much positive impact would this initiative have on our key metrics or strategic goals?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Negligible impact最大:Transformative impact
Q15
選択式

If only one initiative could be funded this quarter, which would you choose?

  • Bet A
  • Bet B
  • Bet C
  • Bet D
  • None of the above
Q16
AIインタビュー

Based on your prioritization above, please share your reasoning. Our AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions to better understand your thinking.

Q17
選択式

Which region are you primarily based in?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East & Africa
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
オピニオンスケール

Bet A — Confidence: How confident are you in our ability to estimate the impact and feasibility of this initiative?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very uncertain最大:Very confident
Q19
オピニオンスケール

Bet B — Confidence: How confident are you in our ability to estimate the impact and feasibility of this initiative?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very uncertain最大:Very confident
Q20
オピニオンスケール

Bet C — Confidence: How confident are you in our ability to estimate the impact and feasibility of this initiative?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very uncertain最大:Very confident
Q21
オピニオンスケール

Bet D — Confidence: How confident are you in our ability to estimate the impact and feasibility of this initiative?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very uncertain最大:Very confident
Q22
オピニオンスケール

How confident are you in the overall prioritization you provided above?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Very confident
Q23
選択式

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
オピニオンスケール

Bet A — Ease: How easy would this initiative be to implement given current resources, technical complexity, and dependencies?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Extremely difficult最大:Very easy
Q25
オピニオンスケール

Bet B — Ease: How easy would this initiative be to implement given current resources, technical complexity, and dependencies?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Extremely difficult最大:Very easy
Q26
オピニオンスケール

Bet C — Ease: How easy would this initiative be to implement given current resources, technical complexity, and dependencies?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Extremely difficult最大:Very easy
Q27
オピニオンスケール

Bet D — Ease: How easy would this initiative be to implement given current resources, technical complexity, and dependencies?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Extremely difficult最大:Very easy
Q28
自由回答（長文）

What key risks, dependencies, or assumptions should we consider for Bet A?

Q29
自由回答（長文）

What key risks, dependencies, or assumptions should we consider for Bet B?

Q30
自由回答（長文）

What key risks, dependencies, or assumptions should we consider for Bet C?

Q31
自由回答（長文）

What key risks, dependencies, or assumptions should we consider for Bet D?

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

このテンプレートの設計意図をご紹介します。ほかのアンケートツールには、直接比較できるテンプレートが見つかりませんでした。

ここが違う

  • Scores every initiative (Bet A–D) across all three ICE dimensions — Impact, Confidence, and Ease — using dedicated opinion-scale questions, not just a single composite risk rating
  • Pairs each quantitative ICE score with a matching open-text question capturing risks, dependencies, and assumptions for that specific initiative, so scores come with rationale attached
  • Includes a ranking question and a forced single-choice 'if only one could be funded' question that let you cross-validate the calculated ICE scores against stakeholders' gut prioritization
  • Closes with an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes the reasoning behind a respondent's prioritization, plus role, region, and tenure segmentation to see how views differ by stakeholder type

よくあるご質問

「ICE Scoring: Roadmap Prioritization Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が31問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「<p>Welcome to the Roadmap Prioritization Assessment.</p><p>You will evaluate four proposed initiatives on three dimensio…」・「How closely are you involved in roadmap planning decisions?」・「How familiar are you with Bet A?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、31問を約13分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Product & UX

E-Commerce Power User Retention & Churn Survey

Measures behavioral patterns, value perceptions, and retention intent among high-frequency e-commerce shoppers to identify churn risk factors and inform loyalty strategy.

テンプレートを見る
Product & UX

Product Feature Prioritization Survey: Impact, Urgency & Adoption Rankings

Collects stakeholder rankings of proposed product features across three dimensions—impact, urgency, and adoption speed—to provide data-driven input for roadmap prioritization decisions.

テンプレートを見る
Product & UX

Product Feature Impact & Priority Survey

Collects structured customer input on feature preferences scored by impact, urgency, and usage frequency to inform product roadmap prioritization decisions.

テンプレートを見る
Product & UX

Incident Communication Effectiveness Assessment

Evaluates stakeholder perceptions of incident communication timeliness, clarity, frequency, and helpfulness to identify priority improvements in crisis communication workflows.

テンプレートを見る
Product & UX

Product Integration Priorities & Gaps Assessment

A structured survey for active product users to evaluate current integration usage, identify unmet needs, and prioritize capabilities — providing actionable data for roadmap planning.

テンプレートを見る
Product & UX

Annual Planning Priorities, Risks, and Bold Bets Survey

Collects input from every level of the organization on top priorities, resourcing tradeoffs, biggest risks, and the bold bets people would make for next year. An AI follow-up presses into the reasoning, blockers, and resources behind each person's proposed bet, so planning starts with real signal instead of guesses.

テンプレートを見る