Internal Communication & Information Flow Survey
Measures how well information, decisions, and priorities actually reach employees across teams and levels — covering channels, managers, and cross-department flow. An AI follow-up interview digs into a real recent breakdown to surface what would have actually fixed it, not just abstract complaints.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
In the last 30 days, how often did you have the information you needed to do your job well?
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
How much do you agree with each statement about communication at our company?
- Leadership shares information transparently
- I understand how major decisions get made
- Information flows well between different departments/teams
- I get updates in time to actually act on them
- The tools we use for communication work well for my day-to-day needs
How well-informed do you feel about the company's current goals and priorities?
Which channel do you rely on most for work-related communication day to day?
- Chat app (e.g. Slack, Teams)
- Video calls
- In-person meetings
- Company intranet or wiki
- Project management tool
Which of these improvements would make the biggest difference to communication at our company, and which would matter least?
- More frequent updates from leadership
- Clearer, more organized project documentation
- Faster responses from other teams/departments
- Better tools for team collaboration
- More chances to give feedback upward
- Less email/message overload
- More live team or all-hands meetings
- More transparency around how decisions get made
How would you rate your direct manager's communication with you?
In the past month, how often have you felt out of the loop on decisions that affected your work?
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Very often
Ask the respondent to walk through one specific, recent instance where communication broke down at work — what was supposed to happen, what actually happened, and what impact it had on their work. Anchor on their lowest-rated item from the agreement statements or the improvement they picked as mattering most, and probe concretely what change would have prevented the breakdown. If they say communication is generally fine, ask about a time they were surprised by a decision or change they should have known about earlier.
Just a few quick background questions to help us spot patterns — all optional.
Which department or team are you part of?
- Engineering/Product
- Sales
- Marketing
- Customer Support
- Operations
- Finance/Legal
- HR/People
- Other
- Prefer not to say
How long have you been with the company?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 3-5 years
- More than 5 years
- Prefer not to say
Which best describes your role level?
- Individual contributor
- Team lead/supervisor
- Manager
- Senior leadership/executive
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your responses will be combined with your colleagues' feedback to identify where communication is breaking down and prioritize fixes. No individual answers will be shared.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes a matrix and multiple-choice questions covering channel reliance, manager communication, and how often employees feel out of the loop on decisions — not just a single satisfaction score
- Pairs quantitative items (rating, opinion scale, max-diff on improvement priorities) with an AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to walk through one specific, recent communication breakdown
- The AI interview digs past abstract complaints to surface what would have actually fixed that specific incident, giving qualitative root-cause data alongside the quantitative scores
- Closes with optional department, tenure, and role-level questions so patterns can be segmented by team and level, with results auto-compiled into a report
QuestionPro
Company Communication Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is a sample questionnaire and question bank for internal communication surveys rather than a ready-to-field adaptive interview tool. It's useful as a reference for question wording and covers many of the same themes (channels, managers, awareness of goals) but is presented as a static template/guide, not a product with built-in follow-up logic.
優れている点
- Broad library of pre-written communication survey questions to draw from
- Established survey platform with standard question types (multiple choice, rating, matrix)
- Content framed around common internal communication themes like channel use and manager communication
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe a specific recent breakdown — respondents just answer fixed questions
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No mention of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
よくあるご質問
「Internal Communication & Information Flow Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how communication is working at our company. Your honest answers help us fix re…」・「In the last 30 days, how often did you have the information you needed to do your job well?」・「How much do you agree with each statement about communication at our company?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。