Internal Process Improvement Diagnostic Survey
Diagnoses friction in a specific internal process — where time gets lost, which steps break down, and what to fix first — built for ops leads, IT, or process owners running a targeted improvement review. A trade-off ranking surfaces the top pain point, and the AI follow-up interview digs into a concrete recent example instead of a generic complaint.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Which process are you evaluating today? (Template note: replace with the specific process names you're studying before launching.)
- Process A (Replace with your process name)
- Process B (Replace with your process name)
- Process C (Replace with your process name)
Overall, how efficient is this process today?
How much do you agree with the following statements about this process?
- Steps in this process are clearly documented
- Handoffs between teams or systems are smooth
- The tools/systems I use support this work well
- I have the authority to resolve issues without escalating
- Exceptions or edge cases are handled effectively
In the last 30 days, how often did this process cause a delay, error, or rework you had to fix?
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Every time
Allocate 100 points across these stages based on where the most time gets lost or wasted. (Template note: replace the stage names with the actual steps in your process.)
- Intake/request submission (Replace with your stage)
- Review/approval (Replace with your stage)
- Execution/fulfillment (Replace with your stage)
- Handoff to another team (Replace with your stage)
- Quality check/rework (Replace with your stage)
- Closeout/reporting (Replace with your stage)
Comparing these pain points, which is the biggest problem and which is the smallest? (Template note: replace with the actual pain points your team has flagged.)
- Unclear ownership of steps (Replace with your pain point)
- Manual data entry/re-entry (Replace with your pain point)
- Slow approvals (Replace with your pain point)
- Poor visibility into status (Replace with your pain point)
- Outdated tools or systems (Replace with your pain point)
- Inconsistent instructions across teams (Replace with your pain point)
- Too many exceptions/special cases (Replace with your pain point)
Probe the specific pain point the respondent ranked as the biggest problem: ask for a recent, concrete example — what triggered it, how much time or effort it added, and who else was involved. If their overall efficiency rating was low but the pain point they picked seems minor, reconcile that gap by asking what else is really driving the frustration. Close by asking what a realistic fix would look like and what has stopped that fix from happening already.
If you could change exactly one step in this process, what would it be and why?
Which department or team are you part of?
- Operations (Replace with your department)
- Customer Support (Replace with your department)
- Engineering/IT (Replace with your department)
- Finance (Replace with your department)
- Prefer not to say
How long have you been performing this process?
- Less than 3 months
- 3-12 months
- 1-3 years
- More than 3 years
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed directly into a process review, and the biggest pain points will be prioritized for fixes this quarter.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- A max diff trade-off ranking forces respondents to name their single biggest pain point instead of listing generic complaints, and the AI follow-up interview then digs into a concrete recent example of that exact pain point.
- A constant-sum allocation (100 points across process stages) pinpoints where time is actually being lost, paired with a frequency question on delays, errors, and rework in the last 30 days for a factual baseline.
- A matrix of agreement statements and an efficiency rating give quantifiable process-health scores, while an open long-text question captures the one change respondents would prioritize.
- Responses feed directly into an auto-generated report built for a process review, with per-response quality scoring so ops leads can trust which answers are substantive.
Jotform
Process Improvement Survey Form TemplateA ready-to-use static form template on Jotform's builder, easily customizable with their drag-and-drop editor and form logic. It's a fielding-ready survey but relies on fixed question sets rather than any adaptive questioning. Good for quick deployment if you already know exactly what to ask.
優れている点
- Fielding-ready template with drag-and-drop customization
- Benefits from Jotform's broader form logic and integration ecosystem
- Likely quick to deploy and embed
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual responses in depth
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- No voice interview option or transparent prompt methodology
SurveyMonkey
Tool And Process Improvement Survey TemplateA fielding-ready static survey template covering tool and process improvement broadly, backed by SurveyMonkey's established analytics and benchmarking features. It's a solid generic starting point but not tailored specifically to diagnosing one named internal process end-to-end.
優れている点
- Fielding-ready with SurveyMonkey's analytics dashboard
- Backed by broad survey benchmarking data
- Familiar, trusted platform for respondents
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI interview to dig into a specific recent example
- No automated quality scoring per response
- No transparent, publishable prompt methodology
SurveySparrow
Process Improvement Survey TemplateA fielding-ready conversational-style template, leveraging SurveySparrow's chat-like UI for a more engaging respondent experience. Sample questions are provided but appear to be static, not dynamically generated based on answers. Good for a friendlier feel but not a diagnostic deep-dive tool.
優れている点
- Conversational chat-style question flow
- Fielding-ready with sample questions included
- Likely mobile-friendly presentation
物足りない点
- Conversational tone is scripted, not adaptive AI-driven follow-up
- No mechanism to surface and then probe a top-ranked pain point
- No per-response quality scoring or auto-generated diagnostic report
Typeform
Process Improvement Survey TemplateA fielding-ready template built on Typeform's well-known one-question-at-a-time design, good for completion rates and polish. It's a static question set with branching logic at best, not a system that interviews respondents about specific examples. Best suited for lightweight pulse checks rather than a targeted diagnostic review.
優れている点
- Polished, high-completion-rate question flow
- Fielding-ready with Typeform's design strengths
- Supports basic conditional logic branching
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice interview option
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- No transparent AI prompt methodology since there's no AI involved
よくあるご質問
「Internal Process Improvement Diagnostic Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to help us fix this process! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized.…」・「Which process are you evaluating today? (Template note: replace with the specific process names you're studying before l…」・「Overall, how efficient is this process today?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。