QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Team Performance & Collaboration Pulse Check

Measures how a team is actually performing — goal clarity, communication, accountability, and delivery speed — from the perspective of the people doing the work. Built for managers and HR/People teams running quarterly or post-project pulse checks. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind the biggest rated gap instead of leaving it as a vague score.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on how your team is working together. Your honest input helps us fix what's actually getting in the way. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 6 minutes.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how would you rate your team's performance over the last quarter?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Far below expectations最大:Far exceeds expectations
Q03
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about your team?

6行 × 5列
  • My team communicates openly about problems and roadblocks
  • My team meets its commitments and deadlines
  • My team resolves disagreements without lingering tension
  • Team members hold each other accountable for quality work
  • My team makes decisions quickly enough to keep work moving
  • ほか1件
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how often did your team hit its stated deadlines?

  • Always
  • Most of the time
  • About half the time
  • Rarely
  • Never / not applicable
Q05
評価スケール必須

How would you rate the clarity of communication within your team over the last month?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very unclear最大:Very clear
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these areas most needs improvement for your team to perform better, and which matters least right now?

  • Communication and information-sharing
  • Clarity of goals and priorities
  • Accountability for commitments
  • Speed of decision-making
  • Workload balance across the team
  • Skills or knowledge gaps
  • Support from leadership/manager
  • Cross-team collaboration
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most needs improvement最も悪い:Least needs improvement
Q07
ポイント配分必須

Thinking about a typical work week, how does your team's collaborative time actually get spent? Distribute 100 points across these activities.

  • Planning and alignment
  • Focused execution / deep work
  • Meetings and status updates
  • Unblocking and problem-solving
  • Administrative tasks
100ポイントを配分
Q08
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct a specific, recent example behind the respondent's overall performance rating and their top-priority improvement area from the trade-off question: what happened, who was involved, and what got in the way. If the rating was high, probe what specifically is working so it can be reinforced. If it was low, push for what a fix would concretely look like and who would need to act on it.

Q09
選択式必須

How confident are you that your team will meet its goals this quarter?

  • Not at all confident
  • Slightly confident
  • Moderately confident
  • Very confident
  • Extremely confident
Q10
選択式

Which best describes your role on this team?

  • Individual contributor
  • Team lead / manager
  • Director or above
  • Other
Q11
選択式

How long have you been part of this team?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6-12 months
  • 1-2 years
  • More than 2 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you! Your responses will be combined with your teammates' answers into a summary report used to strengthen how this team works, not to evaluate any individual.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific, recent example behind the respondent's biggest rated gap, turning a vague low score into an actionable incident instead of leaving it as a number
  • Combines quick quantitative pulse questions (opinion scale, matrix agreement, deadline frequency, communication rating, max-diff prioritization, constant-sum time allocation) with role and tenure context so results can be segmented by who is answering
  • Ends with a transparent, respondent-friendly close explaining that responses will be combined with teammates' answers, setting expectations for aggregated reporting
  • Built specifically for managers and HR/People teams running recurring quarterly or post-project pulse checks, not a generic one-off satisfaction survey

Jotform

Team Performance Survey Form Template

A fielding-ready, customizable form template covering general team performance questions, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's designed for quick deployment and integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (payments, workflows, etc.). It is a static question set with no mechanism to probe deeper into any individual response.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use, easily customizable form builder interface
  • Broad integration ecosystem typical of Jotform (notifications, workflows, storage)
  • Low barrier to quick deployment for teams already using Jotform

物足りない点

  • Static question list with no adaptive follow-up to dig into specific low scores or incidents
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No published methodology or transparent prompt logic behind question design

SurveyMonkey

Team Performance Survey: Questions & Template

SurveyMonkey offers a template built from expert-written question sets aimed at gauging team performance, backed by their established survey analytics and benchmarking tools. It's a solid fixed-format questionnaire but relies on respondents' self-rated closed answers without follow-up. Reporting is analytics-dashboard based rather than narrative incident reconstruction.

優れている点

  • Well-established survey analytics and dashboard reporting
  • Question set informed by SurveyMonkey's broad survey-design experience
  • Easy to launch to teams already using SurveyMonkey's distribution tools

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to explore the story behind a low-rated area
  • No voice-based interview option for open-ended reflection
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses

QuestionPro

Top 15 Teamwork Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is primarily an educational/reference page listing sample teamwork survey questions rather than a single fielding-ready template, though QuestionPro's platform can operationalize the questions. It's useful as a question-bank reference for teams building their own survey. It does not present a packaged, ready-to-send instrument with built-in reporting the way a template page typically would.

優れている点

  • Curated list of teamwork-focused questions covering multiple dimensions
  • Backed by QuestionPro's broader survey platform capabilities
  • Useful as a reference for teams designing their own custom questionnaire

物足りない点

  • Presented as a guide/question list rather than a ready-to-field packaged template
  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe the reasoning behind any specific answer
  • No automated per-response scoring or auto-generated qualitative reporting mentioned

よくあるご質問

「Team Performance & Collaboration Pulse Check」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on how your team is working together. Your honest input helps us fix what's a…」・「Overall, how would you rate your team's performance over the last quarter?」・「How much do you agree with each statement about your team?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

U.S. Military Service Experience & Transition Survey

Captures how current and former U.S. service members experience training, leadership, benefits, and the shift to civilian life. Built for veteran support organizations, military HR, and transition programs, with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the real story behind each respondent's recommendation score.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Team Performance & Collaboration Evaluation

Evaluates how well a team communicates, makes decisions, shares workload, and supports its members — straight from the people doing the work. Built for managers and HR running regular team health checks, with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind whatever obstacle or low score members flagged, not just the number they gave it.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Team & Group Project Performance Evaluation

Captures how a group or team performed on a shared project — coordination, workload fairness, communication, and overall output quality — for managers, educators, or project leads reviewing team dynamics after a collaboration ends. The AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or decision that most helped or hurt the group's performance, going beyond generic ratings.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Anonymous Employee Feedback & Culture Pulse Survey

A confidential pulse check on communication, recognition, workload, and trust in leadership — for HR and people teams who want honest signal without retaliation fears. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each person's lowest-rated area, surfacing specifics that a number alone never would.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Company Feedback & Culture Pulse Survey

Gauges how employees feel about leadership, growth, workload, and culture, and prioritizes which issues matter most through a best-worst trade-off exercise. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind the recommendation score, surfacing specifics HR and leadership can act on instead of vague satisfaction numbers.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Cross-Department Performance & Collaboration Review

Captures how internal stakeholders experience working with a specific department — responsiveness, quality, communication, and reliability — plus a trade-off exercise on what to fix first. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific recent interaction behind the numbers so leaders get concrete, fixable detail instead of vague ratings.

テンプレートを見る