QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

LGBTQ+ Representation in Media Consumption Survey

Measures how LGBTQ+ audiences and allies encounter and judge queer representation in film, TV, and streaming — how often they see it, where, and whether it feels authentic — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into one specific portrayal that shaped their view. Built for media researchers, studios, and advocacy orgs.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全15問・約8分
Q01
メッセージ

Hi! Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience with LGBTQ+ representation in TV, film, and streaming. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There are no wrong answers — this takes about 8 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how often did you watch a show or movie that included LGBTQ+ characters or storylines?

  • Never
  • Once or twice
  • A few times a week
  • Almost daily
Q03
選択式必須

Where do you typically encounter LGBTQ+ representation in media?

  • Streaming services (e.g., Netflix, Hulu)
  • Broadcast or cable TV
  • Movies in theaters
  • Social media or short-form video
  • Podcasts
  • Books
Q04
マトリクス必須

Thinking about LGBTQ+ representation you've seen recently, how much do you agree with each statement?

5行 × 5列
  • Characters feel realistic and well-rounded, not just symbols
  • Storylines rely on stereotypes or tropes
  • Stories show everyday life and joy, not only struggle or trauma
  • Representation reflects diversity within the LGBTQ+ community (race, age, ability, etc.)
  • LGBTQ+ roles are cast with LGBTQ+ actors
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

When you judge whether LGBTQ+ representation is done well, which of these matters most and which matters least?

  • Authentic, well-developed characters
  • Diversity within LGBTQ+ identities shown
  • Avoiding stereotypes and tropes
  • Storylines centered on joy, not just hardship
  • Casting LGBTQ+ actors in LGBTQ+ roles
  • How often LGBTQ+ characters appear at all
  • Quality of the overall storyline
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q06
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how satisfied are you with the current state of LGBTQ+ representation in mainstream media?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all satisfied最大:Extremely satisfied
Q07
選択式必須

Have you specifically sought out a show, movie, or creator because of its LGBTQ+ representation?

  • Yes, often
  • Yes, a few times
  • No, never
  • Not sure
Q08
オピニオンスケール必須

How important is it to you that LGBTQ+ roles are played by LGBTQ+ actors?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not important at all最大:Extremely important
Q09
自由回答（短文）

What's one show, movie, or piece of media you feel got LGBTQ+ representation especially right (or wrong)? A title is enough.

Q10
AIインタビュー

If the respondent named a specific title, have them walk you through the scene, character, or storyline that stood out and why it felt authentic or fell flat — anchor on whether it avoided stereotypes and whether it showed joy versus only hardship. If they didn't name a title or said 'not sure', ask them to describe the most memorable LGBTQ+ character they've seen anywhere and probe the same authenticity questions.

Q11
メッセージ

One last section — a few quick demographic questions to help us understand patterns across different audiences. All are optional.

Q12
選択式

Which best describes your sexual orientation?

  • Lesbian
  • Gay
  • Bisexual
  • Pansexual
  • Asexual
  • Straight/heterosexual
  • Queer
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

Which best describes your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Transgender
  • Genderqueer or genderfluid
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
選択式

What is your age range?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your perspective! Your answers will be combined with others to help creators and platforms understand what authentic, well-loved LGBTQ+ representation actually looks like.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond frequency and satisfaction ratings with an AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to walk through a specific scene or portrayal that shaped their view, surfacing depth static forms can't capture
  • Uses a MaxDiff exercise to force-rank what actually matters when judging representation quality, rather than relying on single agree/disagree items
  • Separates behavior (where and how often representation is encountered) from evaluation (authenticity, casting importance, satisfaction) across dedicated question types, then ties it together with an auto-generated report
  • Keeps demographic questions (orientation, gender identity, age) at the end with clear framing, and every AI probe/prompt is transparent and reviewable rather than a black box

QuestionPro

LGBT Media Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a direct topical match — a ready-made questionnaire on LGBT media representation with sample questions. It's a static form template rather than an adaptive interview, so all respondents get the same fixed question set regardless of their answers. Good for benchmarking standard question wording, less suited to probing individual stories in depth.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for the LGBT media representation topic, so questions are pre-validated for relevance
  • Provided as a sample questionnaire, making it easy to preview and adapt wording quickly

物足りない点

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up, so it can't dig deeper when a respondent mentions a specific show or scene
  • No voice interview option or screen-share task capability
  • No published per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

Jotform

Media Consumption Survey Form Template

This is a general-purpose media consumption survey, not specific to LGBTQ+ representation, so it would need substantial customization to fit this use case. It's a static, editable form builder template rather than a fielding-ready LGBTQ+ representation study. Useful mainly as a starting shell for basic media habit questions.

優れている点

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's form builder
  • Covers general media consumption habits that could be adapted as a base structure

物足りない点

  • Not tailored to LGBTQ+ representation at all — lacks any built-in questions on authenticity, casting, or queer visibility
  • Static form with no adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice option
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report

よくあるご質問

「LGBTQ+ Representation in Media Consumption Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が15問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Hi! Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience with LGBTQ+ representation in TV, film, and streaming. Your…」・「In the last 30 days, how often did you watch a show or movie that included LGBTQ+ characters or storylines?」・「Where do you typically encounter LGBTQ+ representation in media?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、15問を約8分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Point-of-Service Smiley-Face Satisfaction Survey

A fast, in-the-moment feedback survey using simple smiley-face ratings across the key touchpoints of a visit (overall experience, staff, speed, environment) — built for retail, hospitality, healthcare, and other service settings. An AI follow-up interview digs into the 'why' behind the overall rating so low scores aren't a mystery and high scores reveal what to protect.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Movie Viewing Habits & Platform Preferences Survey

Tracks how often people watch movies, which formats and platforms they use, and what drives their viewing choices — built for studios, streaming services, and theater chains. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the decision journey behind a respondent's most recent movie, surfacing friction points closed questions miss.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Media Consumption Habits & Platform Preferences Survey

Tracks how people actually spend time across streaming, social, news, podcasts, and print, which factors drive platform and subscription choices, and how much they trust what they consume. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind a recent change in habits — a dropped subscription, a new app, or a shift away from a channel — instead of just the stated reason.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Movie Review & Audience Reaction Survey

Captures how audiences rate a movie's story, acting, visuals, and pacing right after watching it, plus their likelihood to recommend it — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific scene or moment that actually shaped their overall opinion. Built for studios, distributors, and festivals collecting post-screening feedback.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Public Attitudes on Gender Equality & Policy Survey

Measures how people perceive progress on gender equality, which policy issues they think deserve attention, and whether they've personally experienced unfair treatment. Built for researchers, advocacy groups, and pollsters tracking public opinion, with an AI follow-up that digs into the personal reasoning and lived experience behind the numbers.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Online Video & Streaming Viewing Habits Survey

Captures how people discover, choose, and feel about the online video and streaming content they watch — device usage, time spent, value perceptions, and decision drivers — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind a recent subscription decision.

テンプレートを見る