すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Candidate Interview Scheduling Experience Survey

Captures how smooth or frustrating candidates found the process of scheduling their job interview — from first contact to joining the call or arriving on-site. Built for talent acquisition and recruiting ops teams who want to spot friction before it costs them strong candidates, with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment scheduling went wrong (or right).

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share feedback on scheduling your interview with us! This helps us make the process smoother for future candidates. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 7 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

How were you first contacted to schedule your interview?

  • Email
  • Phone call
  • Text message
  • Online scheduling tool/link
  • Through a recruiter platform
  • Other
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

How easy was it to find an interview time that worked for your schedule?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q04
選択式必須

Did scheduling your interview require multiple rounds of back-and-forth messages?

  • No, it was set up in one exchange
  • One or two follow-ups
  • Three or more follow-ups
  • I'm not sure
Q05
選択式必須

How much advance notice did you receive before your interview?

  • Less than 24 hours
  • 1-3 days
  • 4-7 days
  • More than a week
  • I don't recall
Q06
マトリクス必須

Thinking about the communication you received before your interview, how much do you agree with each statement?

4行 × 5列
  • I received clear instructions on how to join or where to go
  • I knew who I would be interviewing with
  • I got a reminder close to the interview time
  • Rescheduling (if needed) was easy
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
評価スケール必須

How would you rate the overall professionalism of the scheduling communication (tone, responsiveness, follow-through)?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q08
選択式必須

Did you experience any technical issues joining your interview (video link, dial-in, wrong location, etc.)?

  • No issues
  • Minor issue, quickly resolved
  • Significant issue that delayed or disrupted the interview
  • Interview did not take place as scheduled
Q09
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the specific moment the scheduling process felt smoothest or most frustrating for this candidate. If they rated ease of scheduling low or reported multiple back-and-forth exchanges or technical issues, probe exactly what happened, who they were dealing with, and what would have fixed it. If everything went well, ask what specifically made it feel effortless so it can be replicated for other candidates.

Q10
オピニオンスケール必須

Based on your experience scheduling this interview, how likely are you to recommend this company as a place to interview to a friend?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q11
選択式

What format was your interview?

  • Phone
  • Video call
  • In-person
  • Panel (multiple interviewers at once)
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

Which best describes the role you interviewed for?

  • Entry-level / early career
  • Mid-level individual contributor
  • Senior / staff level
  • Management or leadership
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your experience! Your feedback goes directly to our recruiting team and helps us fix friction points in how we schedule and communicate with candidates.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moment scheduling felt smoothest or most frustrating, surfacing root causes static forms can't capture
  • Combines quantitative signals (ease-of-scheduling scale, professionalism rating, likelihood-to-recommend) with open-ended probing in one flow
  • Covers the full scheduling journey — first contact, back-and-forth messaging, advance notice, technical issues joining — plus role and interview format context for segmentation
  • Auto-generates a report from responses so recruiting ops teams don't have to manually tabulate friction points

Jotform

Interview Schedule Form Template

This is a scheduling/logistics form for recruiters to book or confirm interview slots, not a post-scheduling feedback survey. It's fielding-ready as a form builder template but isn't designed to measure candidate sentiment about how scheduling went. Useful for the transactional step QuestionPunk's survey follows up on.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for capturing scheduling logistics (time, date, contact info)
  • Drag-and-drop form builder with broad template library
  • Easy to embed or send as a standalone link

物足りない点

  • No mechanism to probe candidate experience or sentiment about the scheduling process
  • Static field set with no adaptive follow-up questioning
  • No per-response quality scoring or automated experience reporting

Typeform

Interview Schedule Form Template

Also a scheduling-input form (collecting availability/preferences) rather than a survey measuring how candidates felt about the scheduling experience. Typeform's conversational UI makes it pleasant to fill out, but it stops at data collection and doesn't dig into friction points after the fact.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
  • Good for collecting candidate availability efficiently
  • Broad integration ecosystem for scheduling workflows

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to investigate why scheduling felt smooth or frustrating
  • Not structured to measure post-hoc candidate sentiment, professionalism, or advance-notice satisfaction
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses

SurveyMonkey

Candidate Experience Survey Template + 25 Example Questions

A genuinely comparable candidate-experience survey, but it's broad (covering the whole hiring journey) rather than focused specifically on scheduling friction, and the page reads partly as a question-bank/guide with example questions rather than a single fielding-ready instrument. Teams would need to hand-pick and adapt scheduling-specific items themselves.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with strong distribution and reporting tools
  • Broad candidate experience question bank covering multiple hiring stages
  • Familiar, easy-to-launch template format

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to reconstruct the specific scheduling moment that went right or wrong
  • Static multiple-choice/rating questions only, no voice AI interview option
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

よくあるご質問

「Candidate Interview Scheduling Experience Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share feedback on scheduling your interview with us! This helps us make the process s…」・「How were you first contacted to schedule your interview?」・「How easy was it to find an interview time that worked for your schedule?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る