QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Market Research

Post-Meeting Effectiveness & Engagement Survey

A structured feedback instrument for evaluating meeting productivity, organization, psychological safety, and environment. Designed for post-meeting deployment to identify actionable improvements for recurring team meetings.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全17問・約8分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to the Post-Meeting Feedback Survey. This short survey (approximately 9 minutes) asks about your experience in the meeting you just attended. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. Participation is entirely voluntary—you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers; we are simply interested in your honest opinions.

Q02
選択式

How often do you typically attend meetings like the one you are evaluating?

  • Daily
  • A few times per week
  • About once per week
  • A few times per month
  • Rarely
Q03
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how productive was this meeting?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all productive最大:Extremely productive
Q04
オピニオンスケール

How comfortable did you feel speaking up during this meeting?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all comfortable最大:Extremely comfortable
Q05
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the technology and tools used during this meeting (e.g., video, screen sharing, audio quality)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q06
AIインタビュー

Thinking about this meeting overall, what worked well and what could be improved?

Q07
選択式

What is your primary role in this organization?

  • Individual Contributor
  • Team Lead / Manager
  • Executive / Senior Leader
  • Contractor / Consultant
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey! Your feedback will be reviewed to help improve future meetings. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact your meeting organizer.

Q09
選択式

What was the primary purpose of this meeting?

  • Team Update
  • Project Discussion
  • Brainstorming / Ideation
  • Training / Workshop
  • Decision Making
  • Other
Q10
オピニオンスケール

How well organized was this meeting?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all organized最大:Extremely organized
Q11
オピニオンスケール

How engaged did you feel during this meeting?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all engaged最大:Extremely engaged
Q12
オピニオンスケール

How appropriate was the length of this meeting for the topics covered?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Far too short最大:Far too long
Q13
自由回答（長文）

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your meeting experience?

Q14
選択式

What is your age group?

  • Under 18
  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
オピニオンスケール

How clearly were the meeting objectives communicated?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clearly最大:Extremely clearly
Q16
選択式

What is your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
オピニオンスケール

To what extent did this meeting make good use of your time?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all最大:To a great extent

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Combines structured opinion-scale ratings (productivity, organization, objective clarity, time use, psychological safety, engagement, tools/tech, meeting length) with an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes what worked and what could be improved, rather than stopping at fixed-choice ratings.
  • Includes a dedicated psychological safety item ('how comfortable did you feel speaking up') alongside engagement and organization metrics, so safety is measured in context with overall meeting effectiveness rather than as a standalone construct.
  • Closes with an open-text reflection question plus role, age, and gender demographic breakdowns, enabling segmented analysis of who finds meetings effective versus who doesn't.
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and auto-generated reports turn the raw feedback into actionable, ready-to-share findings without manual tallying.

QuestionPro

Psychological Safety Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a dedicated psychological safety questionnaire template, useful as a reference for question wording but scoped narrowly to safety climate rather than overall meeting productivity, organization, or engagement. It reads as a static question set rather than a fielding-ready adaptive instrument.

優れている点

  • Focused, well-scoped question bank specifically on psychological safety
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey research content and platform

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — respondents can't be probed further on why they feel unsafe or safe
  • Doesn't address meeting-specific factors like tech/tools, length, or objective clarity
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of responses

SurveyMonkey

Meeting Presentation Feedback Template & Questions

A straightforward meeting/presentation feedback template aimed at gathering ratings on delivery and content. It's a static, fixed-question instrument well suited to quick pulse checks but not designed for deeper diagnostic follow-up on recurring team meeting dynamics.

優れている点

  • Simple, quick-to-deploy template from a widely used survey platform
  • Good fit for presentation-style meeting feedback specifically

物足りない点

  • Static question list with no adaptive AI interview to dig into open-ended 'what worked/what didn't'
  • No built-in psychological safety or engagement-specific items evident from the template's framing
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated qualitative report

SurveySparrow

Quarterly Team Meeting Survey Template

Targets recurring team meetings on a quarterly cadence, which aligns with the recurring-meeting use case, but appears built around a fixed set of rating questions rather than adaptive, conversational follow-up. Good for periodic pulse-checks rather than granular per-meeting diagnostics.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for recurring team meetings, matching a similar use case
  • Conversational chat-style survey format that's easy for employees to complete

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe individual open-ended responses
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share task capability
  • No visible automated scoring or transparent methodology for how responses are interpreted

よくあるご質問

「Post-Meeting Effectiveness & Engagement Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が17問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome to the Post-Meeting Feedback Survey. This short survey (approximately 9 minutes) asks about your experience in t…」・「How often do you typically attend meetings like the one you are evaluating?」・「Overall, how productive was this meeting?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、17問を約8分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Market Research

Net Promoter Score (NPS) Customer Experience Survey

A methodologically sound NPS survey for measuring customer loyalty alongside overall satisfaction. Designed for post-interaction or periodic deployment to identify promoters, passives, and detractors, and to surface actionable drivers of customer experience.

テンプレートを見る
Market Research

Post-Meeting Effectiveness Pulse Survey

Captures participant feedback on meeting usefulness, content quality, and format preferences to help teams continuously improve their meeting culture and cross-functional alignment practices.

テンプレートを見る
Market Research

Meeting Effectiveness & Decision-Making Assessment

Evaluates meeting structure, facilitation quality, and decision follow-through to identify specific improvement opportunities. Designed for organization-wide or team-level deployment with results segmented by function, role level, and work arrangement.

テンプレートを見る
Market Research

Meeting Effectiveness and Planning Survey

Measures how well meetings are planned, run, and followed up on — cadence, agenda discipline, and the biggest time-wasters — for teams and ops leaders auditing their meeting culture. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a recent unproductive meeting to surface the specific root cause behind the numbers.

テンプレートを見る
Market Research

Meeting Effectiveness & Culture Pulse Survey

Measures how employees actually experience the meetings on their calendar — frequency, agenda discipline, time well spent, and what they'd fix first — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific meeting that felt like a waste of time and what would have made it worth attending.

テンプレートを見る
Market Research

Post-Webinar Satisfaction & Impact Survey

Measures attendee satisfaction, content relevance, pacing, and behavioral intent after webinars. Designed for event teams seeking actionable feedback to improve content, delivery, and future session planning.

テンプレートを見る