すべてのテンプレート
Market Research

New Service Concept Test & Purchase Intent Survey

Tests reaction to a new service concept before launch — clarity, uniqueness, price sensitivity, purchase intent, and adoption barriers — with an AI follow-up that digs into why respondents would or wouldn't buy. Built for product and innovation teams validating a concept ahead of investment.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for helping us test a new service idea! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. You'll read a short description and share your honest reaction — there are no right answers, and your feedback directly shapes whether and how we build this. About 6-7 minutes.

Q02
テキストハイライト必須

Read the concept below, then highlight any words or phrases that stand out to you — whether because they excite you, confuse you, or make you skeptical.

(Replace with your new service concept description, including its core benefit, how it works, and its price point.) (Template note: replace with your own concept description before launching.)

Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

Based on what you just read, how likely are you to purchase or sign up for this service if it were available today?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q04
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about this concept?

5行 × 5列
  • This is different from anything else I currently use
  • It's easy to understand what this service does
  • This would solve a real problem for me
  • The idea feels believable and realistic
  • I trust the brand to deliver on this
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
価格感度分析(Van Westendorp)必須

Thinking about a monthly or one-time price for this service, please answer honestly based on what you'd actually pay.

  • At what price would this service be so cheap that you'd question its quality?
  • At what price would this service be a bargain — a great deal for the value?
  • At what price would this service start to feel expensive, though you'd still consider it?
  • At what price would this service be so expensive you would not consider it at all?
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)必須

From the list below, which benefit of this service matters most to you, and which matters least?

  • (Replace with benefit A, e.g., saves time)
  • (Replace with benefit B, e.g., lower cost than alternatives)
  • (Replace with benefit C, e.g., more personalized)
  • (Replace with benefit D, e.g., easier to use)
  • (Replace with benefit E, e.g., more reliable/consistent)
  • (Replace with benefit F, e.g., better customer support)
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q07
選択式必須

What's the biggest thing that would stop you from signing up for this service?

  • Price is too high
  • I don't see how it's different from what I already use
  • I'm not sure it would actually work for me
  • I don't trust a new service like this yet
  • I don't have a need for it right now
  • Nothing — I'd sign up
Q08
選択式必須

If this launched, how would it most likely fit into what you do today?

  • I'd replace my current solution with this
  • I'd use this alongside what I already use
  • I'd try it but probably wouldn't stick with it
  • I wouldn't use it at all
Q09
AIインタビュー

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's purchase-intent rating and stated barrier, anchoring on the specific concept described in this survey. If they rated intent low or picked a barrier, ask what single change to the concept, price, or messaging would move them to 'yes'; if they rated it high, ask what would make them hesitate or delay signing up. Get a concrete, specific answer rather than a general impression.

Q10
選択式

Which age range are you in?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

What is your household income range?

  • Under $25,000
  • $25,000-$49,999
  • $50,000-$74,999
  • $75,000-$99,999
  • $100,000-$149,999
  • $150,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for taking a look! Your reactions, pricing input, and the follow-up conversation will directly inform whether and how we bring this service to market.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Uses an AI follow-up interview that automatically probes why each respondent gave their purchase-intent rating and named a specific adoption barrier, rather than leaving that reasoning as an unanalyzed open-text box
  • Combines a text-highlight exercise on the concept description with Van Westendorp pricing and a MaxDiff benefit trade-off in one flow, so clarity, price sensitivity, and feature prioritization are all captured before purchase intent is asked
  • Pairs a purchase-intent opinion scale and an agreement matrix with automated per-response quality scoring, so low-effort or contradictory answers can be flagged before they reach the report
  • Ends with an auto-generated report summarizing concept reaction, pricing input, and stated barriers, alongside standard demographic breaks (age, gender, household income)

QuestionPro

New Services Concept Test Survey Template

A fielding-ready template on a mature enterprise survey platform, covering concept reaction and purchase intent with standard question types. It benefits from QuestionPro's broader logic, panel, and reporting infrastructure, but the template itself is a static questionnaire rather than an interview experience.

優れている点

  • Backed by an established enterprise survey platform with wide question-type and logic support
  • Likely integrates with QuestionPro's panel and reporting tools for larger-scale fielding

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — respondents answer fixed questions with no automated probing into their reasoning
  • No indication of per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

Jotform

Concept Testing Survey Form Template

A drag-and-drop form template aimed at quick customization and deployment, well suited to teams that want a simple, editable form rather than a research-grade instrument. It's a static form template, not an interactive interview or analysis tool.

優れている点

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's form builder
  • Quick to deploy and embed for teams already using Jotform

物足りない点

  • No adaptive follow-up interviewing — it's a fixed-field form with no capability to dig into individual answers
  • No built-in response quality scoring or automated analysis/report generation for concept-test data

SurveySparrow

Sample Concept Testing Survey Template

A conversational-style survey template from a platform known for chat-like UX, giving concept-testing questions a friendlier feel than a traditional form. It remains a pre-set template of fixed questions rather than a dynamic, question-by-question interview.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-style question flow that may feel more engaging than a static form
  • Part of a platform with broader survey distribution and dashboard features

物足りない点

  • Conversational UI is scripted, not adaptive — it cannot generate follow-up questions based on a respondent's specific purchase-intent reasoning
  • No published per-response quality scoring or transparent AI methodology

Typeform

Product Concept Testing Survey Template

A polished, design-forward template from a platform well known for one-question-at-a-time forms, good for a smooth respondent experience. Like the others, it's a fixed template of pre-written questions with no adaptive interviewing layer.

優れている点

  • Clean, one-question-at-a-time design that's easy for respondents to complete
  • Strong template customization and branching logic within Typeform's ecosystem

物足りない点

  • No AI-driven adaptive follow-up — branching logic is manually configured, not dynamically generated from open-ended reasoning
  • No automated report or quality-scoring layer specific to concept-test responses

よくあるご質問

「New Service Concept Test & Purchase Intent Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for helping us test a new service idea! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. You'll read a…」・「Read the concept below, then highlight any words or phrases that stand out to you — whether because they excite you, con…」・「Based on what you just read, how likely are you to purchase or sign up for this service if it were available today?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る