Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートIndustry-Specific
Presentation Peer Feedback and Skill-Building Survey
Gathers structured, behavior-specific feedback from colleagues who watched a presentation — covering clarity, delivery, visuals, pacing, and Q&A — plus a trade-off ranking of what most needs work. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that stood out, turning vague 'good job' feedback into a concrete example the presenter can act on.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全11問・約6分
Q02
自由回答（短文）必須
Which presentation are you giving feedback on? (Title, topic, or date)
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須
How clear was the core message or main takeaway of the presentation?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Confusing, I couldn't identify one最大:Crystal clear from start to finish
Q04
マトリクス必須
Rate the presenter on each of these specific elements.
5行 × 4列
- Structure & flow (logical order, clear transitions)
- Slide design & visual clarity
- Delivery style, vocal tone & confidence
- Engagement with the audience (eye contact, questions, energy)
- Time management & pacing
列: Needs significant work · Needs some improvement · Solid · Excellent
Q05
評価スケール必須
How well did the presenter handle questions from the audience?
範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Struggled to answer最大:Handled every question with ease
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須
Of these areas, which most needs improvement next time, and which is least urgent?
- Clarity of the core message
- Slide design and visuals
- Delivery confidence and vocal tone
- Pacing and time management
- Audience engagement and energy
- Handling of Q&A
- Storytelling and structure
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most needs improvement最も悪い:Least needs improvement
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely are you to recommend this presenter for a similarly high-stakes presentation in the future?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q08
AIインタビュー
Ask the respondent to describe one specific moment from the presentation that best illustrates their top-priority improvement area from the trade-off ranking — what happened, what the presenter could have done differently, and what impact it had on the audience. Also have them describe the single strongest moment of the presentation and why it worked. If they give only vague praise or vague criticism, push for a concrete example (a slide, a sentence, a question) rather than a general impression.
Q09
自由回答（長文）
If you could give the presenter one piece of advice to apply before their next presentation, what would it be?
Q10
選択式
What's your working relationship to the presenter?
- Direct teammate
- Cross-functional colleague
- Manager or leadership
- External stakeholder or client
- Prefer not to say
Q11
メッセージ
That's everything — thank you for the thoughtful feedback! Responses across reviewers are combined into a private coaching summary for the presenter, focused on specific, actionable next steps.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes a matrix rating covering clarity, delivery, visuals, pacing, and Q&A handling in one structured block, plus a trade-off max-diff ranking to force prioritization of what needs work most
- Pairs a long-text advice question with an AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to describe one specific moment from the presentation, turning vague 'good job' comments into a concrete, actionable example
- Captures relationship-to-presenter context so feedback can be weighted appropriately, and closes with a recommend-likelihood scale for a quick directional read
- Every question is a transparent, fixed prompt with automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report, so the presenter gets a usable summary without manual tallying
Jotform
Presentation Peer Feedback Form TemplateA ready-to-use, static form builder template for collecting peer feedback on a presentation. It's fielding-ready and customizable with Jotform's drag-and-drop editor, but the questions are fixed once published — there's no mechanism to dig deeper into a specific answer. Good for quick deployment, weaker for extracting concrete behavioral detail.
優れている点
- Fielding-ready template within Jotform's established form builder ecosystem
- Easy to customize fields and branding without technical setup
- Integrates with Jotform's broader suite (e.g., PDF reports, notifications)
物足りない点
- No adaptive follow-up — every respondent answers the same static questions regardless of their input
- No voice interview option or guided task/screen-share capability
- No automated quality scoring of individual responses; analysis is manual or via basic form analytics
Typeform
Presentation Peer Feedback FormA conversational, one-question-at-a-time template well-suited to Typeform's polished UX for peer feedback collection. It's a static question flow, though — engaging presentation, but no logic that probes into a specific vague answer to get a concrete example. Best for lightweight, quick-turnaround feedback rather than deep behavioral insight.
優れている点
- Clean, conversational UI that tends to improve completion rates
- Simple to launch and share without technical setup
- Established template designed specifically for presentation peer feedback
物足りない点
- No AI-driven follow-up interview to clarify or deepen a vague response
- No voice AI interview or screen-share guided task option
- No transparent, per-response quality scoring or automated report generation
SurveyMonkey
Workplace Peer Feedback TemplateA general workplace peer feedback template rather than one built specifically around presentations, so questions on visuals, pacing, or Q&A handling would need manual customization. It's a solid, fielding-ready starting point backed by SurveyMonkey's analytics, but remains a static questionnaire with no interview-style probing.
優れている点
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's mature survey analytics and reporting dashboard
- Broad workplace peer feedback focus makes it adaptable to multiple review contexts
- Fielding-ready with minimal setup
物足りない点
- Not presentation-specific out of the box — lacks built-in clarity/delivery/visuals/pacing structure
- No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview to extract a specific concrete example
- No automated per-response quality scoring; reporting is aggregate rather than interview-driven
よくあるご質問
「Presentation Peer Feedback and Skill-Building Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が11問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for giving feedback on a colleague's presentation! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. You…」・「Which presentation are you giving feedback on? (Title, topic, or date)」・「How clear was the core message or main takeaway of the presentation?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、11問を約6分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。