Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートIndustry-Specific
Post-Presentation Audience Feedback Survey
Captures how a presentation, talk, or webinar landed with its audience — clarity, pacing, relevance, and delivery — for presenters, event teams, and internal comms who want to improve the next session. An AI follow-up digs into the exact moment attention was lost or a point clicked, going beyond generic satisfaction scores.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全11問・約6分
Q02
選択式必須
How did you attend this presentation?
- In person
- Live, virtually
- Watched a recording afterward
- Attended part of it only
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須
Overall, how would you rate this presentation?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q04
マトリクス必須
How much do you agree with each statement about the presentation?
5行 × 5列
- The content was relevant to my role
- The pace was appropriate (not too fast or slow)
- The presenter was knowledgeable and credible
- The slides/visuals helped me understand the material
- I learned something I can act on
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
選択式
Which part of the presentation did you find most valuable?
- The main content/slides
- The live demo or examples
- The Q&A discussion
- The handout or follow-up materials
- (Replace with a section specific to this presentation)
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）
Which of these topics would you most and least want covered in a future session?
- (Replace with candidate topic A)
- (Replace with candidate topic B)
- (Replace with candidate topic C)
- (Replace with candidate topic D)
- (Replace with candidate topic E)
- (Replace with candidate topic F)
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most interested in最も悪い:Least interested in
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely are you to recommend this presentation to a colleague with a similar role?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q08
AIインタビュー
Reconstruct the respondent's real experience of the presentation: identify the specific moment or point where they felt most engaged and, separately, where they felt confused or tuned out, and why. If they rated the overall experience low, probe whether it was the content itself, the delivery, the pacing, or the relevance to their work, and ask what would have made it worth their time.
Q09
自由回答（長文）
Any other suggestions for how we could improve future presentations like this one?
Q10
選択式
Which best describes your role in relation to this presentation's topic?
- Direct team member
- Cross-functional partner
- Manager/leadership
- External stakeholder or client
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q11
メッセージ
That's everything — thank you for the feedback! Your responses will be shared with the presenter and event organizers to shape the next session.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview question that reconstructs the respondent's actual experience — pinpointing the specific moment attention was lost or a point landed — rather than stopping at a satisfaction score
- Combines structured measurement (opinion scale ratings, a multi-statement agreement matrix, and a max-diff topic-priority question) with open-ended probing in one flow
- Segments feedback by attendance mode and by the respondent's role relative to the topic, so results can be broken out by audience type
- Closes with a long-text improvement question and a transparent thank-you message, giving presenters both quantifiable scores and qualitative detail for the next session
Jotform
Post Presentation Survey Form TemplateA ready-to-field, customizable form builder template for post-presentation feedback. It covers standard rating and comment fields but is a static form rather than an adaptive interview. Good for quick deployment and Jotform's broader form ecosystem (integrations, payment fields, etc.), though not presentation-analysis specific in its intelligence.
優れている点
- Fielding-ready template with drag-and-drop customization
- Part of a large form-builder ecosystem with many integrations
- Free tier available for basic use
物足りない点
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up logic
- No voice-based interview option
- No automated per-response quality scoring or generated analysis report
SurveySparrow
Post Presentation Survey Form Template for FeedbackA conversational-style survey template aimed at post-presentation feedback, framed under SurveySparrow's employee-experience template library. It emphasizes a chat-like respondent experience but relies on pre-set branching logic rather than true AI-generated follow-up questions. Suitable for quick internal rollout.
優れている点
- Conversational UI intended to feel less like a static form
- Templated for employee/internal-comms use cases
- Fielding-ready out of the box
物足りない点
- Branching/skip logic is rule-based, not adaptive AI probing generated per response
- No voice AI interview mode
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring published
SurveyMonkey
Event Feedback Form TemplateA general post-event feedback template that can be adapted for presentations or talks, though it's framed around events broadly rather than presentation-specific pacing/clarity dynamics. It's a fielding-ready static form with SurveyMonkey's standard analytics dashboard. Best treated as a starting point that needs customization for presentation-specific questions.
優れている点
- Well-known, fielding-ready builder with broad market trust
- Built-in analytics dashboard and benchmarking
- Easy to adapt for various event types
物足りない点
- Generic event framing, not tailored to presentation delivery/pacing specifics
- No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview capability
- No per-response quality scoring or automated qualitative report generation
Typeform
Presentation Feedback Form TemplateA polished, presentation-specific feedback template known for Typeform's clean one-question-at-a-time interface. It's fielding-ready and easy to brand, but the flow is fixed at design time rather than generated dynamically based on answers. Good for lightweight feedback collection without deep qualitative follow-up.
優れている点
- Presentation-specific template, directly on-topic
- Polished, high-completion-rate UI design
- Fielding-ready with easy branding/customization
物足りない点
- Fixed logic-based flow, no true adaptive AI-generated follow-up questions
- No voice AI interview option
- No automated per-response quality scoring or generated report
よくあるご質問
「Post-Presentation Audience Feedback Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が11問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for attending the presentation! We'd love your honest feedback to make the next one better. Your responses are co…」・「How did you attend this presentation?」・「Overall, how would you rate this presentation?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、11問を約6分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。