Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートIndustry-Specific
Conference & Webinar Presenter Feedback Survey
Captures how attendees rate a specific speaker or session — clarity, pacing, expertise, and Q&A handling — plus an AI follow-up that digs into the moment that most shaped their opinion. Built for event organizers, training teams, and internal speaker programs who need actionable feedback beyond a star rating.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全12問・約7分
Q02
自由回答（短文）必須
Which session and presenter are you giving feedback on? (Replace with your event's actual session/speaker list, or convert this to a dropdown. Template note: replace with your own session name before launching.)
Q03
選択式
How did you attend this session?
- In person
- Virtual / livestream
- Recorded or on-demand
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須
Overall, how would you rate this presentation?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Poor presentation最大:Outstanding presentation
Q05
マトリクス必須
Rate the presenter on each of the following:
5行 × 5列
- Clarity of explanations
- Pace of delivery
- Depth of subject knowledge
- Engagement with the audience
- Quality of slides or visual aids
列: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q06
選択式
Compared to what you expected going in, how did the content land?
- Exceeded my expectations
- Met my expectations
- Fell short of my expectations
- I wasn't sure what to expect
Q07
評価スケール
How well did the presenter handle audience questions?
範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Handled poorly最大:Handled excellently
Q08
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely are you to recommend this presenter to a colleague for a future event?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q09
AIインタビュー
Reconstruct the specific moment in the session that most shaped this attendee's rating — a slide, an answer to a question, a story, or a stretch that lost their attention. Anchor on their overall rating and recommendation score: if either was low, probe exactly what broke down and whether it was the content, the delivery, or the format; if both were high, probe what specifically they'd want the presenter to keep doing. If they mention the Q&A, ask for the actual question and answer exchanged.
Q10
自由回答（長文）
What's one thing this presenter could do differently to make the session more valuable next time?
Q11
選択式
Which best describes your role?
- Individual contributor
- People manager
- Senior leader / executive
- Student / academic
- Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ
That's everything — thank you! Your feedback goes directly to the presenter and our events team to shape future sessions.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Goes beyond star ratings with a matrix rating block covering clarity, pacing, expertise, and other presenter dimensions in one structured question.
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moment that most shaped an attendee's opinion — something no static form field can do.
- Captures context (attendance mode, expectations vs. reality, role) so organizers can segment feedback, not just average it.
- Ends with an open-ended improvement question and a clear hand-off message, so the presenter gets direct, actionable takeaways alongside the auto-generated report.
Jotform
Presenter Feedback Survey Form TemplateA ready-to-use, customizable form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, with the usual Jotform integrations and styling options. It's a static question set focused on basic presenter ratings rather than deeper follow-up on attendee experience.
優れている点
- Easy to customize and embed via Jotform's widely-used form builder
- Fielding-ready out of the box with no setup needed
物足りない点
- Static form with fixed questions — no adaptive follow-up based on an individual's answers
- No mechanism to probe the specific moment that shaped an attendee's rating
- No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated report
SurveySparrow
Presenter Feedback FormA conversational-style form template that presents questions one at a time for a more engaging feel than a traditional grid form. The flow is still pre-scripted, so every respondent sees the same fixed question path regardless of their answers.
優れている点
- Conversational, one-question-at-a-time interface that can feel less like a form
- Ready-to-deploy template for quick fielding
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI probing — logic branches are pre-set, not generated from the response content
- No voice AI interview option or screen-share guided tasks
- No transparent, published prompt methodology behind the question flow
QuestionPro
Conference Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is primarily a question-bank/guide page listing sample conference evaluation questions rather than a single fielding-ready template — useful as a reference for writing your own survey. It covers general conference evaluation, not a focused single-presenter feedback flow.
優れている点
- Broad library of sample questions covering multiple aspects of a conference
- Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform for building out a full survey
物足りない点
- Guide/sample-question format rather than a plug-and-play, ready-to-send template
- No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into what shaped an attendee's opinion
- No automated per-response scoring or auto-generated report
Typeform
Free Webinar Feedback Form TemplateA polished, conversational webinar feedback template with Typeform's signature clean single-question screens. It's built for general webinar feedback rather than presenter-specific evaluation, and the logic is limited to standard branching rather than dynamic follow-up.
優れている点
- Clean, mobile-friendly conversational design
- Simple logic jumps for basic branching based on answers
物足りない点
- General webinar-feedback focus rather than session/presenter-specific evaluation (clarity, pacing, Q&A handling)
- No adaptive AI or voice interview follow-up to dig into a respondent's key moment
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated report on responses
よくあるご質問
「Conference & Webinar Presenter Feedback Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for attending! We'd love your honest feedback on the presenter and session you just saw — it helps us book great…」・「Which session and presenter are you giving feedback on? (Replace with your event's actual session/speaker list, or conve…」・「How did you attend this session?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。