QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Presentation Evaluation and Audience Feedback Survey

Measures how clearly a presentation landed with its audience — content quality, delivery, pacing, and whether people can actually act on it — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment or gap that shaped each attendee's overall verdict. Built for trainers, conference organizers, and internal comms teams reviewing a specific talk or workshop.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for sitting through the presentation! We'd love your honest take on what worked and what didn't — it helps the presenter improve. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 4-5 minutes.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how would you rate this presentation?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q03
マトリクス必須

Please rate the presentation on each of the following:

6行 × 5列
  • Clarity of the content
  • Relevance to your work
  • Quality of slides/visual aids
  • Presenter's delivery and energy
  • Pacing and time management
  • ほか1件
列: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q04
選択式必須

Did the presentation achieve what it set out to do?

  • Yes, fully
  • Partially
  • No, it fell short
  • I'm not sure what the goal was
Q05
選択式

Which part of the presentation was most valuable to you?

  • The opening framing/context
  • The core content or data
  • A specific example or case study
  • The live demo
  • The Q&A discussion
  • The closing takeaways/action items
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these would improve the presentation most, and which matter least?

  • More depth on the core topic
  • Better pacing (less rushed or less padded)
  • Clearer visual design on slides
  • More audience interaction
  • More time for Q&A
  • More relevant, concrete examples
  • A shorter overall length
  • A clearer call to action at the end
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Would improve it most最も悪い:Would improve it least
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to apply what you learned in your own work in the next 30 days?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q08
AIインタビュー

Anchor on the respondent's overall rating and whether the presentation achieved its goal. Probe for one specific moment, slide, or example that most shaped their opinion, and what exactly confused, impressed, or disengaged them. If they said they're unlikely to apply what they learned, dig into what's missing (clarity, relevance, or a concrete next step) that would change that. If they rated it highly, ask what the presenter should absolutely keep doing next time.

Q09
自由回答（長文）

If you could change one thing about this presentation, what would it be?

Q10
選択式

Which best describes your role in relation to this presentation?

  • Team member/direct audience
  • Manager or leader
  • Client or external stakeholder
  • Peer presenter/colleague from another team
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

How many similar presentations or sessions have you attended in the past year?

  • None, this was my first
  • 1-2
  • 3-5
  • 6 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for the honest feedback! Your responses will be shared with the presenter to shape how future sessions are prepared and delivered.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that anchors directly on the respondent's overall rating and whether the presentation achieved its goal, digging into the specific moment or gap that shaped their verdict — something static forms can't do.
  • Combines a matrix rating (content, delivery, pacing, etc.) with a max-diff prioritization question, so you get both diagnostic detail and a clear ranked list of what to fix first.
  • Segments feedback by role and prior session frequency (multiple-choice), letting organizers see if reactions differ between first-timers and repeat attendees.
  • Every response is automatically scored for quality and rolled into an auto-generated report, so trainers don't have to manually sort signal from noise in open-text answers.

Jotform

Presentation Evaluation Form Template

A fielding-ready, drag-and-drop form template aimed at collecting general presentation feedback. It's built on Jotform's broad form-builder ecosystem, so it's easy to customize fields and styling, but the questions themselves are fixed once published.

優れている点

  • Easy visual customization within Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
  • Can integrate with Jotform's wider suite (notifications, storage, payment add-ons if needed)
  • Quick to deploy for teams already using Jotform

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up based on an individual respondent's rating
  • No built-in automated quality scoring of responses
  • No published methodology for how questions were designed or validated

SurveySparrow

Free Presentation Evaluation Form Template | For Conferences & schools

A conversational-style survey template positioned for conferences and schools, using SurveySparrow's chat-like one-question-at-a-time format. The conversational UI improves completion feel, but the underlying question flow is still pre-set rather than adaptive per respondent.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-style presentation that can feel more engaging than a traditional form
  • Targeted specifically at education and conference contexts
  • Mobile-friendly delivery

物足りない点

  • Chat-style UI is not the same as true adaptive AI probing — every respondent still sees the same fixed sequence
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No transparent, published prompt/methodology behind question design

Typeform

Presentation Evaluation Form Template

A polished, fielding-ready form template built on Typeform's signature one-question-per-screen design. It's strong on aesthetics and respondent experience but, like other form builders, delivers a static question path with no follow-up logic tied to individual answers.

優れている点

  • Clean, high-engagement single-question-per-screen design
  • Simple to customize branding and question wording
  • Good mobile completion experience

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up — logic jumps are pre-programmed, not generated per response
  • No automated quality scoring of open-text answers
  • No voice AI interview option

QuestionPro

Conference Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

A detailed sample questionnaire and guide for conference/session evaluation, backed by QuestionPro's research-survey platform and analytics. It reads more like a curated question bank and guidance page than a single ready-to-launch template, and it relies on standard fixed-response analytics rather than adaptive interviewing.

優れている点

  • Backed by a mature research-survey platform with strong analytics/reporting
  • Broad sample question bank covering many conference-feedback angles
  • Established in academic/market-research survey contexts

物足りない点

  • Presented as a sample questionnaire/guide rather than a single fielding-ready template
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe individual respondent reasoning
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or voice AI interview capability

よくあるご質問

「Presentation Evaluation and Audience Feedback Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for sitting through the presentation! We'd love your honest take on what worked and what didn't — it helps the pr…」・「Overall, how would you rate this presentation?」・「Please rate the presentation on each of the following:」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Executive Director Annual Performance Evaluation

A confidential board-administered review of the Executive Director's leadership, financial stewardship, fundraising, staff culture, and governance partnership. Combines multi-area rating batteries, a prioritization exercise, and an AI follow-up interview that digs into the reasoning behind the overall rating and contract recommendation, giving the board a richer picture than scores alone.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Post-Presentation Audience Feedback Survey

Captures how a presentation, talk, or webinar landed with its audience — clarity, pacing, relevance, and delivery — for presenters, event teams, and internal comms who want to improve the next session. An AI follow-up digs into the exact moment attention was lost or a point clicked, going beyond generic satisfaction scores.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Presentation Peer Feedback and Skill-Building Survey

Gathers structured, behavior-specific feedback from colleagues who watched a presentation — covering clarity, delivery, visuals, pacing, and Q&A — plus a trade-off ranking of what most needs work. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that stood out, turning vague 'good job' feedback into a concrete example the presenter can act on.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Conference & Webinar Presenter Feedback Survey

Captures how attendees rate a specific speaker or session — clarity, pacing, expertise, and Q&A handling — plus an AI follow-up that digs into the moment that most shaped their opinion. Built for event organizers, training teams, and internal speaker programs who need actionable feedback beyond a star rating.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Seminar & Conference Session Evaluation Survey

Captures how attendees experienced a seminar or conference session — content quality, speaker delivery, logistics, and likelihood to return — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment satisfaction rose or fell instead of settling for a generic rating. Built for event organizers, training teams, and association program committees.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Conference Speaker & Session Evaluation Survey

Captures how attendees rate a speaker's clarity, expertise, and engagement right after a session, plus whether the content met expectations — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their recommendation score. Built for event organizers, L&D teams, and conference producers deciding which speakers to invite back.

テンプレートを見る