Preschool Teacher & Staff Performance Evaluation
A parent- and guardian-facing evaluation of a child's preschool teacher and classroom staff, covering communication, safety, warmth, and learning quality. Built for center directors gathering input for staff performance reviews, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs one specific recent interaction instead of vague praise or complaints.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Overall, how satisfied are you with your child's lead teacher?
How would you rate the teacher and classroom staff on each of the following?
- Communicates about my child's day
- Shows warmth and patience with children
- Supervises children safely
- Plans engaging, age-appropriate activities
- Handles behavior issues fairly and calmly
In the last month, how often did you receive an update from the teacher about your child's day?
- Daily
- A few times a week
- About once a week
- Rarely
- Never
When you've reached out with a question or concern, how would you rate the teacher's responsiveness?
How likely are you to recommend this classroom and teacher to another family at this preschool?
Which areas, if any, would most improve this teacher's performance?
- Daily communication with families
- Classroom safety practices
- Behavior management
- Learning activities and curriculum
- Responsiveness to parent concerns
Rank these staff development priorities in order of importance for improving your child's classroom experience.
- More frequent daily communication
- Additional safety training
- Behavior management training
- Curriculum and activity planning
- Parent-teacher conferences
Reconstruct one specific, recent interaction the parent had with this teacher or classroom staff — what happened, how the teacher handled it, and how the parent felt about the outcome. Anchor on their recommendation likelihood and satisfaction ratings: if either was low, dig into the exact moment that drove it and what a good resolution would have looked like; if both were high, identify the specific behavior worth reinforcing so it can be shared as feedback with the teacher.
What age group is your child in at this preschool?
- Infant
- Toddler
- Preschool (3-4 years)
- Pre-K (4-5 years)
- Prefer not to say
How long has your child been in this teacher's classroom?
- Less than 3 months
- 3-6 months
- 6-12 months
- More than 1 year
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your feedback will be summarized for our director and used to support and coach our teaching staff, with individual responses kept confidential.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes a matrix rating of teacher and classroom staff across multiple dimensions (communication, safety, warmth, learning quality) rather than a single overall score
- Uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct one specific, recent interaction the parent had with the teacher, replacing vague praise or complaints with concrete detail
- Captures both quantitative satisfaction and recommendation metrics (opinion scale) alongside qualitative context like update frequency and responsiveness to concerns
- Closes with a ranking of staff development priorities and open-ended improvement areas, giving directors actionable, prioritized input for performance reviews
Jotform
Preschool Staff Evaluation Form TemplateA static, form-builder-style template for evaluating preschool staff, easy to customize with Jotform's drag-and-drop editor and embed on a center's site. It relies on fixed rating questions and text fields rather than any adaptive follow-up, so nuance in parent feedback depends entirely on how well the form fields are pre-designed. Good for quick deployment, but reporting and analysis are manual or dependent on separate Jotform add-ons.
優れている点
- Easy to customize and brand within Jotform's form builder
- Simple for parents to fill out quickly
- Can be embedded or shared via link with minimal setup
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — all questions are fixed at design time
- No mechanism to reconstruct specific interactions; relies on open text boxes that often yield vague comments
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated director-ready reports
SurveySparrow
Preschool Staff Evaluation Form TemplateSurveySparrow offers a conversational-style survey template for preschool staff evaluation, which improves completion rates over plain forms through its chat-like UI. It still uses pre-set question flows rather than true adaptive interviewing, so it can't probe deeper based on a parent's specific answer. Reporting is dashboard-based rather than narrative, director-ready summaries.
優れている点
- Conversational UI likely improves parent completion rates versus a traditional form
- Supports branching logic for basic personalization
- Mobile-friendly presentation suited to parents filling it out on phones
物足りない点
- Branching logic is rule-based, not an AI-driven adaptive interview that reconstructs a specific interaction
- No voice AI interview option for parents who prefer speaking over typing
- No transparent, published prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of responses
Typeform
Preschool Teacher Evaluation Form TemplateTypeform's preschool teacher evaluation template uses its signature one-question-at-a-time design, which tends to feel more personal and reduce drop-off compared to dense grid forms. Like other form builders, questions are static once published, with no capability to dynamically follow up on a parent's specific answer. Useful for structured feedback collection, but summarization into a staff-review-ready report requires manual work or separate integrations.
優れている点
- Clean, one-question-at-a-time interface that reduces respondent fatigue
- Strong design customization to match a preschool's branding
- Wide range of native question types (rating, multiple choice, opinion scale) for structured feedback
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI interviewing — the flow is fixed logic, not a real-time follow-up conversation
- No option for voice-based interviews or guided screen-share tasks
- No built-in automated scoring or auto-generated performance reports for directors
よくあるご質問
「Preschool Teacher & Staff Performance Evaluation」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share feedback on your child's teacher and classroom staff. Your honest answers help…」・「Overall, how satisfied are you with your child's lead teacher?」・「How would you rate the teacher and classroom staff on each of the following?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。