QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Seminar & Conference Session Evaluation Survey

Captures how attendees experienced a seminar or conference session — content quality, speaker delivery, logistics, and likelihood to return — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment satisfaction rose or fell instead of settling for a generic rating. Built for event organizers, training teams, and association program committees.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for attending (Replace with seminar/event name)! We'd love your honest feedback to make the next one better. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

Which session or track did you attend? (Template note: replace with your actual session list before launching.)

  • Session A (Replace with title)
  • Session B (Replace with title)
  • Session C (Replace with title)
  • Attended multiple sessions
  • Full-day/general track
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how satisfied were you with this seminar?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q04
マトリクス必須

Please rate the following aspects of the seminar.

5行 × 5列
  • Relevance of content to your work
  • Speaker knowledge and delivery
  • Pacing and time management
  • Venue, tech setup, and comfort
  • Quality of handouts or materials
列: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this seminar to a colleague?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Among the topics covered, which were most and least valuable to you? (Template note: swap in the actual topics covered.)

  • Topic 1 (Replace)
  • Topic 2 (Replace)
  • Topic 3 (Replace)
  • Topic 4 (Replace)
  • Topic 5 (Replace)
  • Topic 6 (Replace)
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most valuable最も悪い:Least valuable
Q07
選択式

For future sessions like this, which format would you prefer?

  • In-person only
  • Virtual only
  • Hybrid (in-person with live-stream option)
  • No preference
Q08
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the specific moment or aspect that drove the respondent's overall satisfaction and recommendation scores — ask what stood out most (positively or negatively) and why. If they rated the seminar highly, probe which single element they'd want repeated at the next event; if they rated it low or middling, probe exactly what fell short and what a fix would look like. Anchor on concrete details (a specific speaker moment, a logistics issue, a topic gap) rather than general impressions.

Q09
自由回答（短文）

What's one change that would make the next seminar noticeably better?

Q10
選択式

How likely are you to attend a future seminar in this series?

  • Definitely will attend
  • Probably will attend
  • Not sure
  • Probably won't attend
  • Definitely won't attend
Q11
選択式

Which best describes your role or industry?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Senior leader/executive
  • Student or academic
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

That wraps up the survey — thank you! Your feedback goes directly into the planning report we use to shape content and logistics for the next seminar.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond star ratings with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moment attendee satisfaction rose or fell, rather than stopping at a generic score
  • Combines standard seminar metrics (overall satisfaction, likelihood to recommend, a ratings matrix on content/speaker/logistics) with a max-diff question to rank which topics were most and least valuable
  • Captures actionable, forward-looking data — preferred future formats, likelihood to attend future sessions in the series, and a short open-text ask for the one change that would improve the next event
  • Segments feedback by session/track and by attendee role or industry, so organizers and program committees can see how experience differs by audience

Jotform

Seminar Evaluation Survey Form Template

A fielding-ready static form covering standard seminar feedback fields with Jotform's drag-and-drop builder and form-app ecosystem. It relies on fixed rating and text fields with no mechanism to probe why a respondent gave a particular score. Good for quick setup and integrations, but the analysis burden falls entirely on the organizer.

優れている点

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization
  • Broad integration ecosystem (payments, storage, notifications)
  • Fast to deploy for basic feedback collection

物足りない点

  • Static questions only — no adaptive follow-up to dig into a specific moment of satisfaction or dissatisfaction
  • No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
  • No built-in voice interview or screen-share task option

QuestionPro

Seminar Evaluation Survey Template

A conventional seminar evaluation template built on QuestionPro's enterprise survey platform, offering standard rating scales and reporting dashboards. It's designed for broad survey research use cases rather than event-specific adaptive interviewing, so it captures what attendees felt but not the specific moment behind the rating. Reporting is dashboard-based rather than automatically narrative.

優れている点

  • Enterprise-grade survey logic and reporting dashboards
  • Wide range of question types for general survey design
  • Established platform with broad market use

物足りない点

  • No AI-driven follow-up interview to reconstruct the moment behind a satisfaction score
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No transparent, publishable prompt methodology for how follow-ups are generated

Typeform

Free Seminar Evaluation Form Template

A conversational-style, fielding-ready form well suited to a pleasant respondent experience, using Typeform's signature one-question-at-a-time flow. It still relies on fixed question paths and can branch with basic logic, but it cannot adaptively interview a respondent about a specific remembered moment. Reporting is standard summary analytics rather than auto-generated narrative reports.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI
  • Simple conditional logic for basic branching
  • Strong mobile-friendly respondent experience

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up probing into why satisfaction rose or fell at a specific point
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses

よくあるご質問

「Seminar & Conference Session Evaluation Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for attending (Replace with seminar/event name)! We'd love your honest feedback to make the next one better. Your…」・「Which session or track did you attend? (Template note: replace with your actual session list before launching.)」・「Overall, how satisfied were you with this seminar?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Graduation Exit Survey: Satisfaction & Career Readiness

Captures graduating students' satisfaction with their program, how prepared they feel for their next step, and where the institution should invest next — built for registrars, program directors, and career services teams closing out a cohort. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real reasons behind low preparedness or satisfaction scores instead of stopping at a number.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Conference Evaluation & Attendee Experience Survey

Captures how attendees rated sessions, speakers, networking, and logistics, plus their likelihood to return or recommend — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the single moment or gap that most shaped their overall verdict. Built for event and community teams planning next year's agenda and budget.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Conference Speaker & Session Evaluation Survey

Captures how attendees rate a speaker's clarity, expertise, and engagement right after a session, plus whether the content met expectations — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their recommendation score. Built for event organizers, L&D teams, and conference producers deciding which speakers to invite back.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Conference Session and Speaker Feedback Survey

Captures attendee reactions to a specific session — content depth, speaker delivery, relevance to their work, and preferred formats going forward — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment that shaped their overall rating instead of a generic thumbs up or down.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Seminar Feedback and Attendee Profile Survey

Captures how attendees rated the seminar's content, speakers, and logistics, alongside who they are professionally — with an AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind their overall rating so organizers know exactly what to fix or repeat next time.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Program and Session Participant Feedback Survey

Captures how participants experienced a workshop, training, or program — satisfaction, perceived value of specific sessions, and likelihood to return — paired with an AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind their ratings so organizers know exactly what to keep, fix, or cut next time.

テンプレートを見る