Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートProduct & UX
Unmoderated Usability Test with Screen Share & Voice
A self-serve usability session: participants share their screen, complete guided tasks on your website or prototype while thinking aloud, and the AI moderator watches, prompts, and probes — then debriefs them. You get recordings, transcripts, and task-level analysis without scheduling a single session.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全7問・約10分
Q02
同意必須
Before we start, please review and confirm.
Q03
選択式必須
How familiar are you with our product?
- I use it regularly
- I've tried it once or twice
- This is my first time seeing it
Q04
音声AIインタビュー
Moderated task session
Moderate a think-aloud usability session. For each task: read the task aloud, then stay quiet while the participant works — prompt only if they go silent for a while ('What are you thinking right now?', 'What did you exp…
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須
Overall, how easy or difficult was it to complete the tasks?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q06
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely would you be to use this product for real, based on what you just experienced?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q07
メッセージ
Thank you — that was genuinely helpful. Your recording and reasoning go straight to the team who can fix what you struggled with.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Guided tasks with screen share and recording, moderated by an AI that prompts think-aloud, never leads, and debriefs at the end — no scheduling, no moderator hours
- Recording consent is built into the flow, and every session produces a transcript plus task-level analysis
- Standard measures included (SEQ-style ease rating, adoption likelihood) so results benchmark across rounds
- The moderator asks the question human moderators forget under time pressure: 'what did you expect that to do?'
Maze
Usability Testing Template (Testing a New Product)A structured unmoderated usability template that mixes screening, scenario-based tasks, expectation-validation, and open-ended wrap-up, backed by automatic behavioral metrics (bounce rates, misclicks, heatmaps) and reporting within hours. Very strong on quantitative interaction capture, but follow-up questions are pre-scripted rather than adaptive to what a participant just did.
優れている点
- Scenario/task framing ('imagine you were trying to accomplish X') that produces realistic task-based testing
- Combines expectation-validation questions with open-ended wrap-up for qualitative signal
- Automatic behavioral metrics: bounce rates, misclicks, heatmaps, and a usability score for prototype navigation
- Automated reporting delivered within hours, lowering analyst effort
物足りない点
- Follow-up questions are fixed in the flow; there is no AI probing when a participant struggles or gives a surprising answer
- Unmoderated by design means no live voice interviewer to ask 'why did you do that?' in the moment
- Screen interaction is captured as heatmaps/misclicks, not a full guided-task screen-share recording with narration
- Insights are metric-driven; less emphasis on a synthesized qualitative narrative per participant
Maze
11 Usability Testing Templates for Building Great ProductsA library of 11 purpose-specific usability templates spanning planning, prototype testing, mobile, feature discoverability, sign-up flow, and standardized instruments (SUS, SEQ) plus a reporting template. Excellent breadth and inclusion of validated metrics, but each is a self-serve question/task form with no adaptive interviewer or voice component.
優れている点
- Broad coverage: plan, early-prototype, new-product, mobile, feature-discoverability, sign-up-flow, and feedback templates in one library
- Includes validated quantitative instruments (System Usability Scale, Single Ease Question) for benchmarkable scores
- Ships a matching usability-testing report template so findings roll straight into a stakeholder deliverable
- Metrics baked in: task completion, misclicks, time-on-task, difficulty ratings
物足りない点
- Templates are static task/question sets, so they cannot ask an adaptive AI follow-up when a task fails
- No voice-AI interview mode to capture think-aloud reasoning conversationally
- No guided-task screen-share + recording flow; behavioral signal is limited to click/heatmap metrics
- Report template is a manual fill-in rather than an auto-written report generated from the session data
SurveySparrow
Website Usability Survey TemplateA website usability feedback survey in chat format — good for scaled self-reported usability sentiment. It asks users what they think of the site; it cannot watch them actually use it.
優れている点
- Quick way to collect usability sentiment from real visitors at scale
- Conversational format keeps completion rates healthy
- Recurring runs support tracking scores across releases
物足りない点
- Self-report only — no screen share, no task observation, no recordings
- No think-aloud moderation or expectation probing at the moment of confusion
- No task-level success metrics, just opinions after the fact
よくあるご質問
「Unmoderated Usability Test with Screen Share & Voice」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が7問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome! In this study you'll share your screen and try a few tasks on our site while thinking out loud. Your responses…」・「Before we start, please review and confirm.」・「How familiar are you with our product?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、7問を約10分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。