すべてのテンプレート
Employee & HR

Restaurant Employee Performance Evaluation Survey

A manager-completed evaluation of an individual restaurant employee covering attendance, guest service, teamwork, food safety compliance, and speed under pressure — with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a specific recent incident behind the employee's guest-recovery rating instead of relying on a vague number. Built for shift leads and GMs running quarterly or post-probation reviews.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

This is a performance check-in for one employee. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Please answer based on their behavior over the last review period — it takes about 5 minutes and helps shape coaching and recognition decisions.

Q02
選択式必須

What is this employee's primary role?

  • Server
  • Bartender
  • Host/Hostess
  • Cook / Kitchen staff
  • Dishwasher / Prep
  • Shift lead / Assistant manager
  • Other
Q03
マトリクス必須

Rate how consistently this employee demonstrates each of the following on shift:

6行 × 4列
  • Arrives on time and ready to work
  • Warm, attentive interaction with guests
  • Communicates well with front-of-house/kitchen counterparts
  • Follows food safety and cleanliness procedures
  • Maintains speed and accuracy during rushes
  • ほか1件
列: Rarely · Sometimes · Usually · Consistently
Q04
選択式必須

In the last 30 scheduled shifts, how many times was this employee late or absent without prior notice?

  • Never
  • Once
  • 2-3 times
  • 4 or more times
Q05
評価スケール必須

How would you rate this employee's ability to handle a difficult guest or resolve a complaint?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Struggles, needs manager to step in最大:Handles it smoothly on their own
Q06
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how would you rate this employee's performance this review period?

スケール: 1 – 10
最小:Well below expectations最大:Outstanding
Q07
ランク付け

Rank these areas from most to least important for this employee to develop next.

  1. Menu and product knowledge
  2. Speed of service during peak hours
  3. Guest complaint recovery
  4. POS or technical systems skill
  5. Team communication
  6. Food safety and cleanliness habits
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q08
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)

Which of these would most motivate this employee to improve, and which would matter least to them?

  • Public recognition or shift shout-outs
  • Bonus pay or tip-pool boost
  • More or better shifts
  • Schedule flexibility
  • A clear path to promotion
  • Paid additional training
  • Small gift card or perk
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Would motivate them most最も悪い:Would motivate them least
Q09
AIインタビュー

Ask the manager to walk through the most recent specific incident behind their guest-complaint-handling rating: what happened, what the employee did or didn't do, and how the guest situation ended. If the rating was low, probe what support or training would have changed the outcome; if it was high, probe what specifically the employee did that other staff could learn from.

Q10
選択式

Based on current performance, is this employee ready to take on more responsibility (e.g., training others, a lead role)?

  • Ready now
  • Ready with more development
  • Not yet ready
  • Not applicable to their role
Q11
自由回答(長文)

Any other observations, strengths, or concerns worth noting for this employee's file?

Q12
選択式

How long has this employee worked at this location?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3-6 months
  • 6-12 months
  • 1-3 years
  • 3+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

Thanks for completing this evaluation. Responses feed into the employee's performance file and into coaching and recognition planning for the team.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that asks the manager to walk through the most recent specific incident behind the employee's guest-recovery rating, turning a vague score into a documented example
  • Combines structured ratings (attendance, consistency matrix, opinion scale) with prioritization tools (ranking of development areas, max-diff on motivators) so managers surface both scores and what to do next
  • Built specifically for the manager-completed, quarterly/post-probation review workflow with role and tenure context questions, not a generic or self-report evaluation
  • Automated quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean GMs get a consistent write-up per employee without manually synthesizing open-ended notes

Jotform

Restaurant Employee Evaluation Form Template

A ready-to-field, restaurant-specific evaluation form covering standard performance categories for staff. It's built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder with themes and integrations, aimed at quick digital replacement of a paper review sheet rather than deeper diagnostic follow-up. Good for basic scoring and recordkeeping, not for probing the story behind a rating.

優れている点

  • Restaurant-specific template, so categories likely map to service-industry roles out of the box
  • Easy to customize fields and branding via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
  • Simple to deploy for managers with no survey-design experience

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to probe into a specific incident behind a rating
  • No voice-based interview option for managers who'd rather talk through an evaluation than type
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or narrative report generation

Typeform

Restaurant Employee Evaluation Form Template

A conversational, one-question-at-a-time restaurant evaluation template that leans on Typeform's polished UX to make manager reviews feel less like paperwork. It's a fielding-ready static template, well-suited to routine periodic check-ins but not designed to dig deeper when a rating needs context. There's no mechanism for the tool itself to ask a manager to elaborate on a specific event.

優れている点

  • Clean, guided single-question flow that reduces survey fatigue for busy managers
  • Restaurant-specific framing already built into the question set
  • Typeform's strong logic-branching for simple conditional paths

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to reconstruct the specific incident behind a low or high guest-recovery rating
  • No voice AI interview or screen-share guided task option
  • Reporting is limited to response summaries, not an automated narrative performance report

よくあるご質問

「Restaurant Employee Performance Evaluation Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「This is a performance check-in for one employee. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Please answe…」・「What is this employee's primary role?」・「Rate how consistently this employee demonstrates each of the following on shift:」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る