すべてのテンプレート
Product & UX

System Usability Scale (SUS) with AI Debrief

The standard 10-item SUS questionnaire, scored 0–100 and benchmarkable against decades of published research — with correct alternating positive/negative wording preserved. An AI debrief interview follows the score, so you learn what to fix, not just where you stand.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

These are the 10 standard System Usability Scale statements — the most widely used usability questionnaire in the world. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Rate your agreement with each, thinking about the product you just used. Some statements are worded positively and some negatively on purpose; read each one carefully.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

I think that I would like to use this system frequently.

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

I found the system unnecessarily complex.

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

I thought the system was easy to use.

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system.

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q06
オピニオンスケール必須

I found the various functions in this system were well integrated.

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須

I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system.

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q08
オピニオンスケール必須

I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly.

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q09
オピニオンスケール必須

I found the system very cumbersome to use.

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q10
オピニオンスケール必須

I felt very confident using the system.

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q11
オピニオンスケール必須

I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system.

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q12
AIインタビュー

Debrief the SUS responses: ask which single moment in the product most shaped their ratings, what felt unnecessarily complex or inconsistent in concrete terms, and what they had to learn before becoming productive. If their ratings suggest high confidence, probe what almost went wrong anyway.

Q13
メッセージ

That completes the SUS. Your ratings convert to the standard 0–100 score you can benchmark against published norms — and the debrief tells us what to actually change.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • The complete validated 10-item SUS battery with the correct alternating positive/negative wording — benchmarkable against published norms (68 is average)
  • An AI debrief follows the score, converting 'usability is 62' into the specific moments that dragged it down
  • Transparent prompts and logged parameters make results defensible in research reports

Maze

System Usability Scale (SUS) Template

A ready-to-field SUS template with all 10 standardized statements on a 1-5 agree/disagree scale, welcome and thank-you screens, and a prototype-testing path. It includes benchmark guidance (68 average, 80+ great) and best-practice tips like testing with five or more users early, making it immediately usable, though it does not layer any qualitative why behind the scores.

優れている点

  • All 10 standardized SUS statements prebuilt on a 1-5 strongly-disagree to strongly-agree scale
  • Provides interpretation benchmarks (68 = average, 80+ = great) so a raw score is meaningful
  • Complete flow with welcome screen, thank-you screen, and a prototype-testing path
  • Actionable methodology tips: test five or more users, run it early, keep wording clear

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up asking why a user disagreed with a statement, so low scores lack diagnostic context
  • No voice-interview option to capture usability frustrations in the participant's own words
  • Score is reported against a benchmark but not turned into a written narrative of what to fix
  • The fixed 10-item instrument does not adapt probes to the specific product being tested

QuestionPro

System Usability Scale Survey Template

QuestionPro's SUS template lists all 10 questions on a 5-point Likert scale and lets researchers amend wording as needed. It is a faithful, editable rendering of the instrument, but the page provides the standard 10 items without the SUS scoring formula or benchmark interpretation, leaving score calculation to the researcher.

優れている点

  • Presents the full 10-question SUS instrument with the standard alternating positive/negative wording
  • Uses the canonical 5-point strongly-agree to strongly-disagree Likert scale
  • Explicitly editable so researchers can adapt items to their system
  • Framed correctly as a quantitative, subjective usability measure

物足りない点

  • No SUS scoring formula or benchmark interpretation shown, so users must compute and interpret scores themselves
  • No adaptive AI follow-up on any low-scoring statement to explain the underlying issue
  • No voice administration of the questionnaire
  • No auto-generated report converting responses into a usability verdict or action list

Typeform

System Usability Survey Template

Typeform's SUS questionnaire in their signature one-question-at-a-time format. Pleasant to take and quick to deploy; scoring and interpretation against SUS norms are left to you, and there is no debrief on what drove the ratings.

優れている点

  • Standard SUS battery in a polished, high-completion conversational UI
  • Fast setup with Typeform's design and logic tools
  • 300+ integrations for piping results into analysis tools

物足りない点

  • No automatic SUS scoring or benchmark interpretation documented on the template page
  • No adaptive debrief converting the score into specific usability fixes
  • No transparent methodology logging for research reporting

よくあるご質問

「System Usability Scale (SUS) with AI Debrief」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「These are the 10 standard System Usability Scale statements — the most widely used usability questionnaire in the world.…」・「I think that I would like to use this system frequently.」・「I found the system unnecessarily complex.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る