QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

AI Tutor Effectiveness and Student Learning Outcomes Survey

Measures how effectively an AI tutor supports student comprehension, engagement, and skill growth, for educators and edtech teams evaluating tutoring tools, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a recent tutoring session to surface what helped or confused the student.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Hi! We're trying to understand how your AI tutor is helping (or not helping) you learn. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 5 minutes, and there are no wrong answers — your honest experience is what matters most.

Q02
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how often did you use the AI tutor?

  • Not at all
  • 1-2 times
  • Weekly
  • A few times a week
  • Almost daily
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

How helpful has the AI tutor been in helping you understand material you were struggling with?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not helpful at all最大:Extremely helpful
Q04
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about your experience with the AI tutor?

4行 × 5列
  • The AI tutor explained concepts clearly
  • The pace matched how quickly I learn
  • The feedback felt personalized to me
  • I felt more confident after using it
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
選択式

Which subjects have you used the AI tutor for?

  • Math
  • Science
  • Reading/Writing
  • Language learning
  • Test prep
  • Coding/Computer science
Q06
評価スケール必須

Overall, how satisfied are you with the AI tutor as a learning tool?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）

Which of these improvements would matter most to your learning, and which would matter least?

  • Faster response times
  • Clearer step-by-step explanations
  • More personalized pacing
  • Better feedback on mistakes
  • More practice problems
  • Ability to ask follow-up questions naturally
  • Progress tracking and summaries
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q08
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the respondent's most recent AI tutoring session in detail: what topic they were working on, what specifically the tutor did well or poorly, and whether they actually understood the material better afterward or just felt like they did. If they rated helpfulness or satisfaction low, probe the exact moment things broke down and what a human tutor would have done differently there.

Q09
数値

On average, how many hours per week do you spend using the AI tutor?

Q10
自由回答（長文）

Describe one specific moment when the AI tutor either really helped you understand something, or really let you down. What happened?

Q11
選択式

What grade level or program are you currently in?

  • Elementary school
  • Middle school
  • High school
  • Undergraduate
  • Graduate
  • Adult learner / other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

Which age range best describes you?

  • Under 13
  • 13-17
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your experience! Your responses will help us improve how the AI tutor explains, paces, and personalizes lessons for students like you.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the respondent's most recent AI tutoring session in detail, surfacing exactly what helped or confused them rather than relying on generic ratings alone.
  • Combines structured measurement (usage frequency, opinion scale on helpfulness, satisfaction rating, matrix of agreement statements, and a max-diff prioritization of improvements) with open-ended depth, giving both quantifiable and qualitative signal on tutor effectiveness.
  • Captures concrete moments of impact through a long-text prompt asking for a specific instance the AI tutor helped or confused the student, which the adaptive interview can then probe further.
  • Every response, including open-text answers, is automatically quality-scored, and the interview prompts are transparent rather than a black box — useful for edtech teams that need defensible, auditable data.

Jotform

E-learning Student Performance Evaluation Form Template

A fielding-ready static form for evaluating e-learning student performance generally, rather than one built specifically around AI tutoring tools. It's easy to deploy and customize but treats all respondents with the same fixed question set. Good for broad course-level feedback, less suited to probing individual tutoring interactions.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use, easily customizable form builder with a large existing template library
  • Simple deployment for general e-learning performance feedback
  • Familiar drag-and-drop interface for non-technical educators

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual student experiences further
  • No mechanism to reconstruct a specific tutoring session or surface what helped or confused a student
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses

QuestionPro

Distance learning survey template for students

A fielding-ready template focused on general distance/remote learning satisfaction rather than AI tutor effectiveness specifically. It likely covers broad experience and engagement questions but isn't designed to isolate tutoring-tool performance or reconstruct session-level detail. Useful as a general remote-learning pulse check.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with broad distribution and reporting tools
  • Template is tailored to the distance-learning context rather than being fully generic
  • Supports standard question types (ratings, multiple choice) for quick fielding

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to reconstruct a specific tutoring session or dig into what confused a student
  • No published methodology or transparent prompt logic behind its questions
  • No per-response automated quality scoring or voice AI interview option

よくあるご質問

「AI Tutor Effectiveness and Student Learning Outcomes Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Hi! We're trying to understand how your AI tutor is helping (or not helping) you learn. Your responses are completely co…」・「In the last 30 days, how often did you use the AI tutor?」・「How helpful has the AI tutor been in helping you understand material you were struggling with?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

VR Simulation Training Effectiveness in Healthcare Education

For nursing, medical, and allied health programs using VR simulation modules. Measures perceived realism, skill and confidence transfer, and how VR compares to traditional training methods — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific moment where the simulation helped or failed to prepare a learner for real clinical practice.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

AI Chatbot Effectiveness in Student Advising & Support

This survey evaluates student experiences with AI chatbot advising and support services. It measures usage patterns, task types, perceived success rates, satisfaction, trust, comparison to human advisors, and areas for improvement.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Student Feedback on Teacher Effectiveness Survey

Gathers student feedback on a teacher's clarity, fairness, engagement, and support, plus which qualities matter most to learning. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind each student's overall recommendation score, surfacing concrete examples instead of vague praise or complaints.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Teaching Assistant Effectiveness Evaluation Survey

Gathers student feedback on a teaching assistant's clarity, responsiveness, fairness, and classroom presence across lectures, labs, or office hours. Includes a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in a TA and an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind each student's overall rating, surfacing concrete strengths and fixable gaps departments can act on.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Educator AI Adoption, Policy & Classroom Impact Survey

Measures educators' AI tool usage patterns, institutional policy clarity, observed classroom outcomes, and support needs to inform evidence-based AI integration strategies across K-12 and higher education contexts.

テンプレートを見る