Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートIndustry-Specific
Team Performance & Collaboration Evaluation
Evaluates how well a team communicates, makes decisions, shares workload, and supports its members — straight from the people doing the work. Built for managers and HR running regular team health checks, with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind whatever obstacle or low score members flagged, not just the number they gave it.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全11問・約6分
Q02
マトリクス必須
How much do you agree with each statement about your team today?
5行 × 5列
- Team members communicate openly about problems
- We hold each other accountable for commitments
- Decisions get made without unnecessary delay
- Workload is distributed fairly across the team
- I trust my teammates to do their part well
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須
Overall, how effective is your team at getting its work done?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not effective at all最大:Extremely effective
Q04
選択式必須
In the last month, what has been the single biggest obstacle to your team's performance?
- Unclear priorities or goals
- Poor communication between members
- Uneven workload distribution
- Slow or unclear decision-making
- Lack of recognition or low morale
- Insufficient resources or tools
Q05
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須
If you could only fix a few of these about the team, which would matter most versus least?
- Clearer role definitions
- Faster decision-making
- More recognition for good work
- Better meeting efficiency
- More balanced workloads
- Stronger cross-team communication
- More access to tools or resources
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most impactful to improve最も悪い:Least impactful to improve
Q06
AIインタビュー
Ask the respondent to walk through a specific, recent example of the obstacle they flagged as biggest — what happened, who was involved, and how it played out. If they rated any team-health statement low (disagree or strongly disagree), probe why that specific one, whether it's new or long-standing, and what a fix would concretely look like. Push past vague answers like 'communication is bad' to get a real scenario.
Q07
評価スケール
How well does your manager support the team in removing obstacles to good work?
範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all supportive最大:Extremely supportive
Q08
自由回答（長文）
What's one thing this team should stop doing in order to work better together?
Q09
選択式
How long have you been part of this team?
- Less than 3 months
- 3-12 months
- 1-3 years
- More than 3 years
- Prefer not to say
Q10
プルダウン
How many people are on this team, including you?
- 2-4
- 5-8
- 9-15
- 16 or more
- Prefer not to say
Q11
メッセージ
That's everything — thank you for the candid feedback! Responses across the team will be summarized to identify shared themes and shape concrete changes, not to single anyone out.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Goes beyond a static satisfaction score with a matrix and rating block, then uses an AI follow-up interview to ask respondents to walk through a specific, recent example of whatever obstacle or low score they flagged — so you get the real story, not just the number.
- Uses a max-diff exercise to force prioritization of what to fix first, paired with an open long-text question on what the team should stop doing, giving both ranked and qualitative signal.
- Includes context questions (tenure on team, team size) so results can be segmented, plus manager-support rating to separate individual contributor experience from leadership performance.
- Auto-generates a report from the mix of scaled, ranked, and open-ended responses, and every AI probe uses a transparent, inspectable prompt rather than a black-box script.
Jotform
Team Evaluation Form TemplateA ready-to-use, customizable form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, aimed at general team evaluation. It's a static fielding-ready template rather than an interview experience, with no mention of adaptive questioning or built-in analysis of open-ended answers.
優れている点
- Quick to deploy with an easy drag-and-drop editor
- Broad template library and integrations typical of Jotform
- Free to start using
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe the story behind a low score or named obstacle
- No voice interview option
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated narrative report
SurveySparrow
Team Evaluation Survey TemplateA conversational-style survey template positioned for employee/team evaluation, in line with SurveySparrow's chat-like survey format. It's a pre-built template for direct fielding, but the conversational format is scripted rather than adaptive to individual answers.
優れている点
- Conversational, one-question-at-a-time UI that feels more human than a grid form
- Built for employee-experience use cases
- Template is ready to launch without custom build work
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI that generates a unique follow-up question based on each respondent's specific obstacle
- No voice AI interview mode
- No published methodology or prompt transparency for how any open-text answers are handled
Typeform
Free Team Evaluation Form TemplateA free, ready-to-use conversational form template on Typeform's standard form platform. It's polished for one-question-at-a-time completion and branching logic, but is still a fixed-question template rather than a dynamic interview.
優れている点
- Clean, guided one-question-at-a-time flow known for high completion rates
- Free tier available to start immediately
- Conditional logic for branching by answer
物足りない点
- No AI-generated follow-up that digs into a specific recent example of a flagged obstacle
- No guided task or screen-share capability
- No automated quality scoring of individual responses
QuestionPro
Performance Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is primarily an individual performance-evaluation template and question bank on an enterprise survey platform, not a team-collaboration-specific instrument. It's usable as a fielding template but reads more like a general reference/sample questionnaire page than a team-health-check tool.
優れている点
- Large enterprise survey feature set (logic, reporting dashboards, multi-channel distribution)
- Sample questions cover broad performance dimensions
- Established platform with extensive customization options
物足りない点
- Focused on individual performance rather than team communication/workload dynamics specifically
- No adaptive AI interview that follows up on a respondent's specific obstacle
- No voice AI interview or automated per-response quality scoring
よくあるご質問
「Team Performance & Collaboration Evaluation」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が11問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on how your team is working together. Your honest answers help us fix real pr…」・「How much do you agree with each statement about your team today?」・「Overall, how effective is your team at getting its work done?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、11問を約6分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。