QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Cross-Department Performance & Collaboration Review

Captures how internal stakeholders experience working with a specific department — responsiveness, quality, communication, and reliability — plus a trade-off exercise on what to fix first. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific recent interaction behind the numbers so leaders get concrete, fixable detail instead of vague ratings.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share feedback on a department you work with. This helps that team understand what's working and what to improve. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5 minutes, and your honest take matters most.

Q02
選択式必須

Which department are you evaluating in this survey?

  • (Replace with Department A, e.g. IT)
  • (Replace with Department B, e.g. Finance)
  • (Replace with Department C, e.g. HR)
  • (Replace with Department D, e.g. Marketing)
Q03
選択式必須

In the last 3 months, how often have you interacted with this department (requests, projects, meetings, etc.)?

  • Not at all
  • A few times total
  • A few times a month
  • Weekly
  • Almost daily
Q04
マトリクス必須

Thinking about your recent experience, how would you rate this department on each of the following?

5行 × 5列
  • Communication clarity
  • Responsiveness to requests
  • Quality of deliverables
  • Reliability in meeting deadlines
  • Collaboration across teams
列: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend working with this department to another team or colleague?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these matters most for this department to improve, and which matters least right now?

  • Faster response times
  • Higher quality of deliverables
  • More proactive communication
  • Better cost or budget management
  • Stronger cross-team collaboration
  • More consistent deadline delivery
  • Deeper technical expertise
  • Greater adaptability to change
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most important to improve最も悪い:Least important to improve
Q07
選択式必須

Compared to 6 months ago, how has this department's performance changed?

  • Improved a lot
  • Improved somewhat
  • Stayed about the same
  • Declined somewhat
  • Declined a lot
  • Not sure / too new to say
Q08
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the most recent specific interaction the respondent had with this department (a request, project, or handoff): what they needed, what actually happened, and what went well or fell short. Anchor closely on the reason behind their recommendation score and the trade-off item they picked as most important to improve. If they rated performance as declining, probe what changed and when; if it's their first real interaction, ask what would build confidence going forward.

Q09
自由回答（長文）

Is there anything specific this department could start, stop, or keep doing to work better with your team?

Q10
選択式

Which department do you primarily work in?

  • (Replace with Department A)
  • (Replace with Department B)
  • (Replace with Department C)
  • (Replace with Department D)
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

How long have you been at the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2 to 5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

Thank you for the detailed feedback! Your responses will be compiled into a department performance report shared with team leads to guide concrete improvements.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific recent interaction behind a respondent's scores, giving leaders concrete, fixable detail instead of vague averages.
  • Includes a trade-off exercise (max-diff) that forces respondents to prioritize what to fix first versus rating everything as equally important.
  • Combines quantitative tracking (matrix ratings, recommend-likelihood, change-over-time question) with qualitative depth (open-ended start/stop/keep and the AI-reconstructed interaction) in one flow.
  • Segments feedback by requester department, interaction frequency, and tenure, so results can be sliced by who is experiencing the friction and how often.

SurveyMonkey

Department Performance Survey Template

A static, fielding-ready template built specifically for rating how stakeholders experience working with an internal department, making it the most directly comparable template found. It relies on fixed rating-scale and open-text questions rather than any adaptive interviewing. As with most SurveyMonkey templates, it's meant to be customized before use rather than run as-is.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for the same core use case: internal stakeholders rating a department's performance
  • Backed by a large, well-known survey platform with broad distribution and reporting tooling
  • Likely quick to deploy given SurveyMonkey's drag-and-drop template editor

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to reconstruct the specific recent interaction behind a low or high score — respondents just leave ratings
  • No built-in trade-off/prioritization exercise (like max-diff) to surface what to fix first versus what's merely nice-to-have
  • No transparent, publishable interview prompts or automated per-response quality scoring — quality control is left to the researcher

よくあるご質問

「Cross-Department Performance & Collaboration Review」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share feedback on a department you work with. This helps that team understand what's…」・「Which department are you evaluating in this survey?」・「In the last 3 months, how often have you interacted with this department (requests, projects, meetings, etc.)?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Client Relationship Health Check Survey

Assesses how a key client or business partner perceives the strength of their working relationship with your team — covering trust, responsiveness, and communication — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moments behind their satisfaction score. Built for account managers, customer success teams, and partnership leads running periodic relationship health checks.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Team Performance & Collaboration Pulse Check

Measures how a team is actually performing — goal clarity, communication, accountability, and delivery speed — from the perspective of the people doing the work. Built for managers and HR/People teams running quarterly or post-project pulse checks. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind the biggest rated gap instead of leaving it as a vague score.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Team & Group Project Performance Evaluation

Captures how a group or team performed on a shared project — coordination, workload fairness, communication, and overall output quality — for managers, educators, or project leads reviewing team dynamics after a collaboration ends. The AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or decision that most helped or hurt the group's performance, going beyond generic ratings.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Team Performance & Collaboration Evaluation

Evaluates how well a team communicates, makes decisions, shares workload, and supports its members — straight from the people doing the work. Built for managers and HR running regular team health checks, with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind whatever obstacle or low score members flagged, not just the number they gave it.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

360-Degree Peer & Manager Feedback Review

Gathers structured multi-rater feedback—from managers, peers, direct reports, and self—on an employee's core competencies and overall effectiveness. An AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete behavioral examples behind the ratings, turning vague impressions into specific, actionable evidence for development conversations.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Performance Review & Development Check-In

A structured self-assessment for performance review cycles, covering goal progress, core competencies, manager support, and development priorities — paired with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the story behind the ratings, not just the numbers, for richer 1:1 prep and calibration.

テンプレートを見る