QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Train-the-Trainer Program Effectiveness Survey

Evaluates whether a train-the-trainer program actually builds facilitation skill and gets used back on the job — covering content relevance, confidence delivering sessions, and skill transfer. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real training session the respondent led afterward, not just their impression of the course.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on the train-the-trainer program you completed! We want to know what actually helped you facilitate better — and what didn't. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

Which format best describes the train-the-trainer program you completed?

  • In-person
  • Live virtual
  • Hybrid (in-person + virtual)
  • Self-paced online
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

How well did the program prepare you to design a training session for your own audience from scratch?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not prepared at all最大:Fully prepared
Q04
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about the program?

4行 × 5列
  • The content covered was directly relevant to my training role
  • The practice sessions and feedback helped me improve my facilitation skills
  • The materials and job aids were easy to reuse back on the job
  • The pace of the program allowed me to actually absorb the material
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
評価スケール必須

How would you rate the trainer who led your train-the-trainer program at modeling the skills they were teaching?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q06
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how many times have you delivered a training session using what you learned in the program?

  • None
  • 1-2 times
  • 3-5 times
  • 6 or more times
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須

How confident are you handling tough participant questions or pushback during a session you're leading?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q08
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these skills from the program have been most and least valuable in your actual training work?

  • Assessing learner needs before a session
  • Applying adult learning principles
  • Core facilitation techniques (questioning, activities, pacing)
  • Giving and receiving feedback
  • Managing difficult or disengaged participants
  • Designing slides and materials
  • Delivering training through virtual tools
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most valuable最も悪い:Least valuable
Q09
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct a specific training session the respondent has led since completing the program: what topic, what audience, what they did differently because of the program, and what actually happened when they applied it. Anchor on one concrete facilitation skill (from questioning, activity design, feedback, or handling difficult participants) and probe whether it worked as taught or needed adapting. If they say they haven't delivered training yet, probe what's blocking them from applying it and how prepared they feel for the first time they do.

Q10
自由回答（長文）

What one change would most improve this train-the-trainer program for the next group of trainers?

Q11
選択式

How many years of experience do you have as a trainer or facilitator?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-9 years
  • 10+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you! Your responses will be combined with other trainers' feedback to improve how we prepare people to teach.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a specific training session the respondent led, going beyond self-reported impressions to actual delivery behavior
  • Combines a matrix of agreement statements, a max-diff ranking of which skills proved most/least valuable, and confidence/rating scales to triangulate skill transfer from multiple angles
  • Asks directly about real-world application (sessions delivered in the last 30 days, confidence handling pushback) rather than stopping at satisfaction with the course itself
  • Closes with an open-ended question on what one change would most improve the program, feeding directly into an auto-generated report for program owners

QuestionPro

Effectiveness of Training (For Trainers) Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a sample questionnaire and question bank for evaluating trainer effectiveness, closely aligned to the train-the-trainer topic. It reads more as a reference list of questions than a single ready-to-field survey flow. Useful for drafting your own instrument, but the reflection is limited to self-report ratings.

優れている点

  • Directly topical to trainer effectiveness evaluation
  • Provides a broad sample question bank covering multiple facets of trainer performance
  • Backed by an established survey platform with reporting and distribution tools

物足りない点

  • Static self-report questions only, no adaptive AI follow-up to probe specifics of a real session
  • No mechanism to reconstruct or verify what actually happened in a training session delivered afterward
  • No published methodology on how responses are scored or weighted

Jotform

Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form Template

A general training effectiveness evaluation form, more oriented to rating a single training event than assessing whether trainers themselves can now facilitate and transfer skills on the job. Fielding-ready as a form, but generic rather than train-the-trainer specific.

優れている点

  • Quick to deploy and customize using Jotform's form builder
  • Familiar rating-scale format for general training feedback
  • Supports basic branching and integrations typical of Jotform forms

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to reconstruct a real session the respondent later delivered
  • Focused on evaluating a training event, not trainer skill transfer or facilitation confidence over time
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses

Typeform

Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form Template

A conversational-style training evaluation form focused on standard satisfaction and effectiveness questions, not specifically on the train-the-trainer skill-transfer use case. It's a fielding-ready template, but limited to fixed question flows without follow-up probing.

優れている点

  • Clean, conversational form UX that can improve completion rates
  • Easy to customize question wording and branching logic
  • Good for quick pulse-style training feedback

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into how a respondent actually applied training skills
  • No voice interview or guided task/screen-share option for richer evidence of skill transfer
  • No transparent prompt or scoring methodology published

よくあるご質問

「Train-the-Trainer Program Effectiveness Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on the train-the-trainer program you completed! We want to know what actually…」・「Which format best describes the train-the-trainer program you completed?」・「How well did the program prepare you to design a training session for your own audience from scratch?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

Distance Learning Experience Survey for Students

Captures how school students are experiencing remote or online classes — focus, workload, technology access, and connection with teachers and classmates — with an AI follow-up that digs into the single biggest obstacle they name. Built for school administrators, ed-tech teams, and researchers evaluating distance learning programs.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Employee Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether recent training actually changed what employees can do on the job — covering content quality, format preferences, and topic priorities — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasons behind low preparedness scores instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Post-Training Session Feedback & Impact Survey

Captures how a training session landed — content quality, trainer effectiveness, and confidence applying new skills — for L&D teams and instructors. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind the recommendation score: what specifically helped or blocked people from using what they learned.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Diversity Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether diversity training changes real workplace behavior, not just satisfaction — covering relevance, confidence applying concepts, and inclusion climate. An AI follow-up interview digs into a specific moment participants applied (or struggled to apply) what they learned, for L&D and DEI teams evaluating training impact.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

AI Upskilling Program Impact & Skill Transfer Survey

Measures whether an AI skills training program actually changed how employees work — confidence gains, specific skill areas, and real on-the-job use — for L&D teams evaluating a completed cohort. The AI follow-up interview digs into what participants actually did differently at work and what's blocking wider adoption.

テンプレートを見る