Vendor & Supplier Diversity Program Assessment
Evaluates how well your organization sources from certified diverse-owned suppliers — spend levels, barriers, and category priorities — for procurement and sourcing leaders. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real recent sourcing decision to surface what actually helped or blocked a diverse supplier from winning the business.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Which best describes your role in vendor or supplier selection?
- I make or approve final sourcing decisions
- I recommend suppliers but someone else approves
- I manage the supplier diversity program itself
- I influence budget/requirements but not supplier choice
- I have no direct role in vendor selection
Roughly what percentage of your team's or business unit's procurement spend went to certified diverse-owned suppliers in the last fiscal year? (Enter your best estimate as a whole number, e.g., 15)
How much of a barrier is each of the following when trying to source from diverse-owned suppliers?
- Finding qualified diverse suppliers in the category we need
- Verifying or trusting diversity certifications
- Diverse suppliers' capacity to handle our contract size
- Budget or pricing pressure favoring incumbent vendors
- Risk aversion from leadership or legal/compliance
- ほか2件
Which supplier diversity categories should your organization prioritize expanding over the next year?
- Women-owned businesses
- Minority-owned businesses
- Veteran-owned businesses
- LGBTQ+-owned businesses
- Businesses owned by people with disabilities
- Small and local businesses
- Employee-owned or worker cooperatives
- Businesses in economically disadvantaged regions
If you had 100 extra points of budget to invest in growing supplier diversity, how would you allocate them across these initiatives?
- Scouting and identifying new diverse suppliers
- Helping suppliers get or maintain certification
- Mentorship and capacity-building for diverse suppliers
- Contract set-asides or reserved bids for diverse suppliers
- Training buyers and sourcing teams on inclusive sourcing
- Better tracking and reporting systems for diverse spend
Compared to your traditional vendors, how satisfied are you with the quality and reliability of the diverse-owned suppliers you've worked with?
Does your organization currently have a formal supplier diversity program with defined goals?
- Yes, with tracked goals and reporting
- Yes, but goals are informal or untracked
- In development
- No formal program
- Not sure
How would you rate leadership's actual support for vendor diversity goals (budget, time, accountability) versus stated commitment?
Ask the respondent to walk through one specific recent sourcing decision where a diverse-owned supplier was considered — what the requirement was, whether the supplier won the business, and the concrete reason for the outcome (price, capacity, relationship, risk sign-off, etc). If a diverse supplier lost, probe what would have needed to be true for them to win. If they can't recall a specific example, ask why diverse suppliers rarely make it into their consideration set at all.
A couple of quick background questions, then you're done.
Which department or function are you in?
- Procurement / Sourcing
- Finance
- Operations
- Legal / Compliance
- Executive leadership
- Other
- Prefer not to say
How large is your organization by number of employees?
- Fewer than 250
- 250-999
- 1,000-4,999
- 5,000-19,999
- 20,000 or more
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed directly into a report on where our vendor diversity program has real momentum and where it's stuck.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes a direct spend-percentage question and a constant-sum budget allocation exercise, so you get quantified current spend and where leaders want to invest next, not just attitudes
- A matrix question ranks specific sourcing barriers and a MaxDiff question prioritizes which supplier diversity categories to expand, giving decision-ready trade-off data
- An AI follow-up interview asks the respondent to walk through one real, recent sourcing decision to surface what actually helped or blocked a diverse supplier from winning the business
- Rating and opinion-scale questions on leadership support and vendor quality satisfaction are paired with role, department, and company-size questions for clean segmentation in the auto-generated report
SurveyMonkey
Vendor Workplace Diversity Survey TemplateThis is a ready-to-field template on an established survey platform, but its framing leans toward assessing diversity within a vendor's own workplace rather than a procurement team's sourcing spend, barriers, and category priorities. It's a fixed-question template, not an interview instrument. Useful as a quick starting point if you want a generic diversity questionnaire rather than a sourcing-decision assessment.
優れている点
- Deployable immediately on a widely-used survey platform with established distribution and reporting tools
- Simple, familiar format for respondents
- Likely easy to customize question wording within SurveyMonkey's editor
物足りない点
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to probe a specific real sourcing decision
- No mechanism to reconstruct or quantify what helped or blocked a diverse supplier in an actual deal
- No transparent prompt methodology since there's no AI interview component
Jotform
Supplier Diversity Registration Form TemplateThis is a supplier-facing registration/intake form, not an internal assessment survey for procurement or sourcing leaders. It's built for collecting supplier certification and contact details, not for measuring program performance, spend levels, or internal barriers. Good for onboarding diverse suppliers, but a different tool for a different job than a program assessment.
優れている点
- Drag-and-drop form builder makes it easy to customize registration fields
- Suited for collecting structured supplier certification and contact data
- Familiar, quick-to-complete form format for external suppliers
物足りない点
- Not designed to assess internal spend levels, barriers, or category priorities at all
- Static form fields with no adaptive follow-up questioning
- No way to capture the narrative of a specific sourcing decision or surface what helped/blocked a supplier
よくあるご質問
「Vendor & Supplier Diversity Program Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes on this. We're assessing how vendor diversity actually works in day-to-day sourcing deci…」・「Which best describes your role in vendor or supplier selection?」・「Roughly what percentage of your team's or business unit's procurement spend went to certified diverse-owned suppliers in…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。