QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Coaching Engagement Effectiveness Evaluation

Measures whether a coaching engagement actually moved the needle — session consistency, coach behaviors, goal progress, and likelihood to continue or recommend — for coaching practices and internal L&D teams evaluating a coach or program. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific breakthrough moment and the biggest gap the coach didn't address.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your coaching experience. Your honest feedback helps us understand what's working and what to improve — this should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

What was the primary focus of your coaching engagement?

  • Leadership development
  • Career transition
  • Performance improvement
  • Executive presence / communication
  • Team or people management
  • Other
Q03
選択式必須

How many coaching sessions have you completed so far?

  • 1-2 sessions
  • 3-5 sessions
  • 6-10 sessions
  • More than 10 sessions
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

How much progress have you made toward the goals you set at the start of coaching?

スケール: 1 – 10
最小:No progress at all最大:Fully achieved my goals
Q05
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about your coach?

5行 × 5列
  • Listened to and understood my specific challenges
  • Held me accountable between sessions
  • Gave feedback I could actually act on
  • Tailored their approach to my situation, not a generic script
  • Challenged me appropriately without being dismissive
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q06
評価スケール必須

Overall, how satisfied are you with your coach?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these aspects of coaching matter most to your progress, and which matter least?

  • Structured goal-setting at the outset
  • Accountability check-ins between sessions
  • Personalized, specific feedback
  • Industry or role-specific expertise
  • Flexibility of scheduling
  • Emotional support during tough moments
  • Practical tools and frameworks
  • Personal rapport and trust with the coach
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q08
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this coach or coaching program to a colleague?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q09
AIインタビュー

Identify the single moment or session where this respondent felt they made the most real progress — what happened, what the coach did, and what changed afterward in their behavior at work. Then probe for the biggest challenge or blind spot they raised that the coach never fully addressed. If they report low progress or low satisfaction, dig into whether the mismatch was the coach's approach, session frequency, or their own follow-through, and anchor on one concrete recent example rather than a general impression.

Q10
自由回答（長文）

Anything specific your coach could do differently to make future sessions more valuable?

Q11
プルダウン

Which best describes your current role level? (Optional)

  • Individual contributor
  • First-line manager
  • Mid-level manager
  • Senior leader / executive
  • Business owner / founder
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

How long have you been working with this coach? (Optional)

  • Less than 1 month
  • 1-3 months
  • 3-6 months
  • 6-12 months
  • More than a year
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your experience! Your responses will be used to coach the coaches — informing feedback and program adjustments, with individual answers kept confidential.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond a static satisfaction form with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific session or moment where the client felt real progress happened, and probes the biggest gap the coach didn't address.
  • Pairs quantitative rigor — an opinion scale on goal progress, a matrix rating specific coach behaviors, a max-diff prioritization of what matters most to progress, and a recommend-likelihood scale — with genuine open-ended reflection.
  • Automated per-response quality scoring flags low-effort or vague answers before they reach the coach or L&D team, and the engagement auto-generates a report instead of leaving you to tabulate raw exports.
  • Optional role-level and tenure-with-coach questions let you segment results by seniority or engagement length without bloating the core survey for every respondent.

Jotform

Online Coaching Evaluation Form Template

A ready-to-use, static form template for gathering coaching feedback, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's fielding-ready out of the box but relies on fixed questions rather than any adaptive questioning. Best suited for teams wanting a quick, customizable form rather than deeper qualitative insight into what happened during coaching.

優れている点

  • Easy to customize via drag-and-drop builder
  • Fielding-ready template, no setup from scratch required
  • Broad integration ecosystem typical of Jotform's platform

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe specific breakthrough moments or unaddressed gaps
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No transparent, inspectable interview methodology since there's no AI interviewing component

Typeform

Coaching Evaluation Form Template

A conversational-style, one-question-at-a-time template optimized for completion rate and visual polish. It's a genuine fielding-ready template for coaching feedback, but it's still a fixed-path form with conditional logic branching, not a true adaptive interview. Good for a pleasant respondent experience; not built for probing follow-up depth.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational UX known to improve completion rates
  • Simple to customize and brand
  • Supports logic-based branching between questions

物足りない点

  • Logic branching is not the same as an AI-driven adaptive follow-up interview that digs into a specific moment or gap
  • No automated quality scoring of responses
  • No voice AI interview option or auto-generated analytical report built into the template

よくあるご質問

「Coaching Engagement Effectiveness Evaluation」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your coaching experience. Your honest feedback helps us understand what's…」・「What was the primary focus of your coaching engagement?」・「How many coaching sessions have you completed so far?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Candidate Hiring Experience Feedback Survey

Captures how job candidates experienced your recruiting and interview process, from job posting through offer or rejection, so talent acquisition teams can spot friction points. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the specific moment that shaped the candidate's overall impression, surfacing concrete fixes that satisfaction scores alone miss.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Coaching Effectiveness Survey

Measures how often employees get coached, which manager behaviors actually land, and which coaching topics matter most to them — built for HR and people-development teams. The AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real recent coaching conversation to surface what's driving (or blocking) impact, instead of relying on generic satisfaction scores.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Coaching Session Client Feedback Survey

Captures how clients experience individual coaching sessions — perceived progress, coach effectiveness across key behaviors, and likelihood to continue or recommend. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind their recommendation score, surfacing what actually drove or undermined value in the session.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Mentor Program Effectiveness Evaluation Survey

Measures how well a mentorship relationship is working for the mentee — guidance quality, meeting consistency, and career impact — with an AI follow-up that digs into a specific moment mentorship helped or fell short, revealing what to fix before the next matching cycle.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Sales Leadership Effectiveness Assessment

A 360-style pulse check on how well a sales manager or leader coaches, unblocks, and motivates their team — built for sales ops and revenue leaders running quarterly leadership reviews. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single behavior driving each respondent's rating, surfacing specific moments instead of generic praise or complaints.

テンプレートを見る