Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートEvents & Community
Conference Evaluation & Attendee Experience Survey
Captures how attendees rated sessions, speakers, networking, and logistics, plus their likelihood to return or recommend — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the single moment or gap that most shaped their overall verdict. Built for event and community teams planning next year's agenda and budget.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全12問・約7分
Q02
選択式必須
Which best describes your role at this conference?
- First-time attendee
- Returning attendee
- Speaker or panelist
- Sponsor or exhibitor
- Staff or volunteer
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely are you to recommend this conference to a colleague in your field?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q04
マトリクス必須
How would you rate each part of the conference experience?
6行 × 5列
- Keynote speakers
- Breakout sessions
- Networking opportunities
- Venue and logistics
- Food and beverage
- ほか1件
列: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q05
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須
Thinking about next year's agenda, which of these session topics matter most to you and which matter least? (Template note: replace with your own conference tracks or topics before launching.)
- (Replace with Topic A)
- (Replace with Topic B)
- (Replace with Topic C)
- (Replace with Topic D)
- (Replace with Topic E)
- (Replace with Topic F)
- (Replace with Topic G)
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most valuable to me最も悪い:Least valuable to me
Q06
選択式
If we ran this conference again next year, which format would you prefer?
- In person only
- Virtual only
- Hybrid (in person with a virtual option)
- No preference
Q07
AIインタビュー
Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's recommendation score: ask what single session, speaker, or interaction most shaped that score, and whether it was a highlight or a letdown. Anchor on whichever aspect they rated lowest in the ratings grid and ask what specifically fell short and what would have fixed it. If they gave a high recommendation score, ask what almost kept them from giving a higher one. Close by asking what one change would most increase their likelihood to attend again.
Q08
自由回答（長文）
Is there anything else you'd like the organizing team to know — a suggestion, a standout moment, or something we should fix?
Q09
メッセージ
Last few questions are optional and just help us understand who attended.
Q10
選択式
Which industry best describes your work?
- Technology
- Healthcare
- Education
- Finance
- Nonprofit / Government
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式
How many years have you attended this conference, including this year?
- This is my first year
- 2-3 years
- 4-6 years
- 7 or more years
- Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ
That's everything — thank you! Your feedback goes straight to the organizing team and will directly inform next year's sessions, speakers, and format.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that probes the single moment or gap that most shaped each attendee's recommendation score, not just the score itself.
- Covers the full picture event teams need for next year's planning: a session/speaker/networking/logistics matrix, max-diff ranking of future topics, and a format preference question, alongside recommend-likelihood.
- Separates required feedback from optional demographic questions (role, industry, years attended) with clear chat-message transitions, keeping the survey feeling conversational rather than like a form.
- Ends with an open-ended long-text question so organizers can capture suggestions or praise that fixed-choice questions would miss, then rolls everything into an auto-generated report.
Jotform
Conference Evaluation Form TemplateA ready-to-use, customizable conference evaluation form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's a static template meant for quick deployment and covers standard rating-scale questions, but it doesn't adapt to individual responses. Good for teams wanting a fast, no-frills form rather than deeper qualitative insight.
優れている点
- Easy to customize and deploy quickly via drag-and-drop builder
- Familiar, simple form format that respondents can complete fast
- Part of a broad template library so it's easy to find alongside related event forms
物足りない点
- Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up to explore why a rating was given
- No transparent, publishable methodology for how responses are scored or interpreted
- No built-in report generation tying qualitative comments to quantitative scores
QuestionPro
Conference Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateA sample questionnaire paired with guidance on conference evaluation survey questions, functioning partly as an educational resource and partly as a usable template. It offers a solid question bank for sessions, speakers, and logistics but is a static instrument once deployed. Best suited to teams who want question ideas alongside a template rather than an adaptive interview experience.
優れている点
- Provides both example questions and survey-writing guidance in one place
- Backed by QuestionPro's broader survey analytics and reporting platform
- Covers common evaluation dimensions like sessions, speakers, and logistics
物足りない点
- Static question list with no adaptive AI probing into individual responses
- Presented largely as a guide/sample rather than a single fielding-ready survey flow
- No transparent per-response quality scoring or prompt-level methodology disclosed
Typeform
Conference Evaluation Survey TemplateA conversational, one-question-at-a-time survey template built on Typeform's polished UI. It delivers a pleasant respondent experience for standard conference feedback questions but, like other form-based tools, asks the same fixed questions of everyone. Suited to teams who value design and simplicity over deeper follow-up.
優れている点
- Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
- Strong design and branding customization typical of Typeform
- Easy to share and embed for quick attendee response collection
物足りない点
- No adaptive follow-up questioning — every respondent sees the same fixed flow
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No automated quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
よくあるご質問
「Conference Evaluation & Attendee Experience Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for spending time at the conference with us! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. We'd love…」・「Which best describes your role at this conference?」・「How likely are you to recommend this conference to a colleague in your field?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。