QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Conference Speaker & Session Evaluation Survey

Captures how attendees rate a speaker's clarity, expertise, and engagement right after a session, plus whether the content met expectations — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their recommendation score. Built for event organizers, L&D teams, and conference producers deciding which speakers to invite back.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for attending (Replace with speaker name)'s session on (Replace with session topic) at (Replace with event name)! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. We'd love your honest feedback on the speaker and content — about 7 minutes. Your answers help us book better speakers and improve future sessions.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how would you rate this session?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q03
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each of the following about the speaker?

5行 × 5列
  • Explained concepts clearly
  • Demonstrated deep knowledge of the topic
  • Kept the audience engaged
  • Paced the session appropriately
  • Handled questions well
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
評価スケール必須

How relevant was the content to your work or interests?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Not relevant at all最大:Extremely relevant
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this speaker to a colleague?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q06
選択式必須

Which best describes how this session compared to your expectations?

  • Fell short of expectations
  • Met expectations
  • Exceeded expectations
Q07
ランク付け

Rank these aspects of the session by how much value they added for you (most valuable first).

  1. New information or insights
  2. Practical takeaways or tools
  3. Real-world examples or case studies
  4. Q&A / audience interaction
  5. Speaker's presentation style
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q08
AIインタビュー

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's recommendation score for the speaker. Anchor on a specific moment in the session — a slide, story, or answer — that shaped their rating. If the score was low, find out precisely what fell flat (content, delivery, pacing, or relevance) and what would have changed their mind. If the score was high, find out what they'd tell someone deciding whether to attend this speaker's next session.

Q09
自由回答（長文）

What's one thing this speaker could do differently to improve future sessions?

Q10
選択式必須

Would you attend another session by this speaker?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Maybe, depends on the topic
Q11
選択式

Which best describes your current role?

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Director / VP
  • C-suite / Executive
  • Student
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

Thanks for sharing your feedback! We'll combine your ratings and comments with other attendees' responses to help choose and coach speakers for future events.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview step that probes the specific moment behind each attendee's recommendation score, rather than stopping at a static number.
  • Combines standard rating formats (opinion scale, matrix, rating, ranking) with an open-ended long-text question, giving organizers both quantifiable scores and qualitative context in one flow.
  • Captures role-based segmentation and 'would attend again' intent alongside expectation-comparison, so organizers can see how different attendee types (e.g., practitioners vs. managers) rated the same speaker.
  • Closes with a transparent, personalized chat message confirming how responses will be aggregated into a report — set expectations without hiding the process.

Jotform

Speaker Evaluation Form Template

A fielding-ready drag-and-drop form covering standard speaker evaluation criteria like clarity and knowledge. It's built on Jotform's general form builder, so customization is flexible but every respondent sees the same static question set. No mechanism for probing deeper into any individual answer.

優れている点

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's builder
  • Likely integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (payment, storage, notifications)
  • Quick to deploy for basic post-session feedback

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up based on a respondent's specific answer
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
  • No published methodology for how questions were derived or scored

SurveySparrow

Speaker Evaluation Form Template

A conversational-style template that presents speaker evaluation questions one at a time for a more engaging feel than a traditional form. It covers similar rating dimensions but each respondent moves through a fixed script rather than a dynamically branching interview. Reporting is likely dashboard-based rather than narrative.

優れている点

  • Conversational one-question-at-a-time UI improves completion feel vs. long forms
  • Templated for events specifically, not a generic form
  • Likely offers basic branching/skip logic based on prior answers

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interviewer that probes the reasoning behind a specific score in real time
  • No voice-based interview option
  • No per-response automated quality scoring for open-ended text

Typeform

Speaker Evaluation Form Template

A polished, conversational-style template known for Typeform's signature one-question-per-screen design and strong visual presentation. It's ready to field but relies on pre-set logic jumps rather than a true AI-driven follow-up that adapts to open-text reasoning. Reporting is largely aggregate stats rather than synthesized narrative insight.

優れている点

  • High design polish and strong completion rates typical of Typeform forms
  • Simple logic-jump branching based on multiple-choice answers
  • Easy embedding and sharing across event channels

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up that dynamically probes the 'why' behind a recommendation score
  • No voice AI interview mode or guided screen-share tasks
  • No automated, per-response quality scoring of write-in answers

QuestionPro

Conference Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is more of a guide-plus-sample-questionnaire page covering whole-conference feedback (venue, logistics, sessions) than a single speaker-focused, fielding-ready template. It's useful for question ideas but broader in scope than a per-session speaker evaluation, and requires manual setup before it's actually deployable. No adaptive interviewing is mentioned or implied.

優れている点

  • Broad coverage of overall conference logistics and satisfaction, not just speaker performance
  • Likely offers many sample question variations to choose from
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey analytics platform

物足りない点

  • Framed as a sample question list/guide rather than a ready-to-field speaker-specific template
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview tied to an individual speaker recommendation score
  • No automated quality scoring or transparent AI-prompt methodology published

よくあるご質問

「Conference Speaker & Session Evaluation Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for attending (Replace with speaker name)'s session on (Replace with session topic) at (Replace with event name)!…」・「Overall, how would you rate this session?」・「How much do you agree with each of the following about the speaker?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Post-Workshop Feedback and Facilitator Effectiveness Survey

Captures how attendees rate a workshop's content, pacing, and facilitator right after it ends, plus how likely they are to recommend it — for training teams and event organizers. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that shaped each person's recommendation score, going beyond star ratings to what actually landed or fell flat.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Conference Session and Speaker Feedback Survey

Captures attendee reactions to a specific session — content depth, speaker delivery, relevance to their work, and preferred formats going forward — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment that shaped their overall rating instead of a generic thumbs up or down.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Seminar & Conference Session Evaluation Survey

Captures how attendees experienced a seminar or conference session — content quality, speaker delivery, logistics, and likelihood to return — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment satisfaction rose or fell instead of settling for a generic rating. Built for event organizers, training teams, and association program committees.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Conference & Webinar Presenter Feedback Survey

Captures how attendees rate a specific speaker or session — clarity, pacing, expertise, and Q&A handling — plus an AI follow-up that digs into the moment that most shaped their opinion. Built for event organizers, training teams, and internal speaker programs who need actionable feedback beyond a star rating.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Conference Evaluation & Attendee Experience Survey

Captures how attendees rated sessions, speakers, networking, and logistics, plus their likelihood to return or recommend — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the single moment or gap that most shaped their overall verdict. Built for event and community teams planning next year's agenda and budget.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Activity & Session Evaluation Survey

A flexible feedback survey for workshops, trainings, retreats, or team activities — covering attendance, facilitator quality, content relevance, and likelihood to recommend, plus an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind each recommendation score so organizers know exactly what to fix or repeat.

テンプレートを見る