すべてのテンプレート
Pricing & Packaging

Fintech Subscription Pricing Sensitivity & Feature Priority Survey

Measures consumer price sensitivity using Van Westendorp methodology, feature prioritization, and billing preferences for fintech subscription plans. Designed for product and pricing teams evaluating consumer willingness to pay across global markets.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全22問・約10分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to this research survey on fintech subscription pricing. This survey takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are anonymous, will be reported in aggregate, and used for internal product research purposes only. Please proceed to begin.

Q02
選択式

Do you currently pay for any consumer fintech app or service (e.g., budgeting tools, investment platforms, credit monitoring)?

  • Yes, I currently pay for one or more
  • Not now, but I paid for one in the last 12 months
  • I have never paid for a fintech app
Q03
メッセージ

<p>Please carefully read the following plan description before answering the next set of questions.</p><p><strong>Proposed Fintech Subscription Plan</strong></p><p>A monthly paid plan for a consumer fintech app that includes:</p><p>Account aggregation (view all accounts in one place)</p><p>Budgeting insights and spending analysis</p><p>Bill tracking and payment reminders</p><p>Credit score monitoring</p><p>Fraud alerts and security notifications</p><p>Priority in-app support</p><p>Please keep this plan in mind as you answer the following questions.</p>

Q04
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to subscribe to a paid plan like this in the next 30 days?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q05
自由回答(長文)

At what monthly price (in your local currency) would this plan be so inexpensive that you would question its quality? Please enter a number only.

Q06
ランク付け

Please rank the following features from most important (1) to least important (6) for a paid fintech plan.

  1. Account aggregation
  2. Budgeting insights
  3. Bill tracking
  4. Credit score monitoring
  5. Fraud alerts
  6. Priority in-app support
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your pricing expectations or must-have features for a paid fintech plan?

Q08
プルダウン

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will help us design better pricing and features for consumer fintech products. You may now close this window.

Q10
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the overall value of this plan based on the features described?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Extremely poor value最大:Extremely good value
Q11
自由回答(長文)

At what monthly price (in your local currency) would this plan feel like a bargain — great value for the money? Please enter a number only.

Q12
選択式

Which billing cadence do you prefer for a fintech subscription?

  • Monthly
  • Quarterly (every 3 months)
  • Semiannual (every 6 months)
  • Annual
Q13
AIインタビュー

We'd like to understand your pricing perspective a bit more. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of brief follow-up questions about the prices and features you selected.

Q14
選択式

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
自由回答(長文)

At what monthly price (in your local currency) would this plan start to feel expensive, but you would still consider it? Please enter a number only.

Q16
プルダウン

What is the minimum discount that would make you choose annual billing instead of monthly?

  • No discount needed — I prefer annual regardless
  • 5% – 10%
  • 11% – 15%
  • 16% – 20%
  • 21% – 30%
  • More than 30%
  • I would never choose annual billing
Q17
プルダウン

In which region do you currently live?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • South America
Q18
自由回答(長文)

At what monthly price (in your local currency) would this plan be too expensive for you to consider at all? Please enter a number only.

Q19
選択式

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college, no degree
  • Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Graduate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
プルダウン

Which monthly price band (in USD) feels most reasonable for a Standard plan with the features described?

  • Under $5
  • $5 – $9
  • $10 – $14
  • $15 – $19
  • $20 – $29
  • $30 or more
Q21
選択式

Which best describes your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker/caregiver
  • Unemployed and looking
  • Not working by choice
  • Retired
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
プルダウン

Which range best describes your annual household income (before taxes) in USD?

  • Under $25,000
  • $25,000 – $49,999
  • $50,000 – $74,999
  • $75,000 – $99,999
  • $100,000 – $149,999
  • $150,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Uses the full 4-question Van Westendorp price sensitivity battery (too cheap, bargain, expensive, too expensive) plus a direct price-band dropdown, rather than a single willingness-to-pay question.
  • Pairs quantitative pricing data with a feature-priority ranking exercise and billing-cadence/annual-discount questions, so pricing and packaging trade-offs are captured in one instrument.
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview after the survey portion to probe the reasoning behind each respondent's price thresholds and feature ranking, with transparent prompts researchers can review.
  • Collects standard segmentation data (age, gender, region, education, employment, income band) enabling cross-market and cross-segment willingness-to-pay analysis, with an auto-generated report at the end.

Jotform

Price Sensitivity Survey Form Template

A fielding-ready form focused on core price sensitivity questions, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's a general-purpose pricing template rather than one tailored to fintech subscriptions or feature-priority trade-offs. Useful as a quick-start form but lacks the fintech-specific plan framing and multi-dimensional structure of a dedicated pricing study.

優れている点

  • Easy to customize and embed via Jotform's widely-used form builder
  • Templatized starting point for basic Van Westendorp-style pricing questions
  • Likely supports standard form logic and export options

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into respondents' pricing rationale
  • No mention of automated response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
  • Not tailored to fintech subscription plans or feature-prioritization trade-offs

SurveyMonkey

Product Feature Survey Template

A general product feature prioritization template on SurveyMonkey's platform, useful for gauging feature importance but not built around pricing sensitivity or subscription billing decisions. It could be adapted for the feature-ranking portion of a fintech pricing study but doesn't address Van Westendorp pricing or plan-specific willingness to pay.

優れている点

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and panel infrastructure
  • Simple structure for ranking or rating feature importance
  • Easy to launch quickly for general feature feedback

物足りない点

  • No pricing sensitivity methodology (Van Westendorp or otherwise) included
  • Fixed-format questions only, with no adaptive AI interview to explore why a feature is prioritized
  • No fintech-specific plan/pricing framing or billing cadence questions

SurveySparrow

Price Sensitivity Questionnaire Template

A conversational-style pricing questionnaire template covering standard price sensitivity questions. It's a static template rather than a fintech-tailored pricing study, and doesn't combine pricing thresholds with feature prioritization or billing preference questions in one flow.

優れている点

  • Conversational chat-like UI that may feel more engaging than a plain form
  • Includes core price sensitivity question types
  • Templatized for quick deployment on SurveySparrow's platform

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI-moderated follow-up interview to probe reasoning behind stated price points
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt transparency
  • Not designed around fintech subscription plans, feature trade-offs, or annual-discount billing preferences

よくあるご質問

「Fintech Subscription Pricing Sensitivity & Feature Priority Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が22問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to this research survey on fintech subscription pricing. This survey takes approximately 10 minutes to complete.…」・「Do you currently pay for any consumer fintech app or service (e.g., budgeting tools, investment platforms, credit monito…」・「<p>Please carefully read the following plan description before answering the next set of questions.</p><p><strong>Propos…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、22問を約10分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る