Membership Fee Value & Pricing Sensitivity Survey
Measures how members perceive the value of their dues, where pricing tolerance breaks down, and which benefits justify the fee — for associations and nonprofits weighing a rate change. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind each member's value rating instead of just the number.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Which best describes your current membership status?
- New member (first year)
- Renewing member (2-5 years)
- Long-standing member (6+ years)
- Lapsed member / considering rejoining
Overall, how would you rate the value you get from your membership relative to what you pay in fees?
How valuable is each of the following membership benefits to you personally?
- Access to events and conferences
- Advocacy and representation on issues that affect members
- Member discounts or perks
- Networking opportunities
- Publications, newsletters, or research
- ほか1件
Thinking about the annual membership fee, please answer with a specific dollar amount for each question.
- At what annual membership fee would the price feel so low that you'd start to question the quality or credibility of the organization?
- At what annual membership fee would the price feel like a bargain — great value for what you get?
- At what annual membership fee would the price start to feel expensive, though you'd still consider joining or renewing?
- At what annual membership fee would the price feel too expensive to join or renew, no matter how much you value the organization?
If your membership fee increased by 10% at your next renewal, what would you most likely do?
- Renew without hesitation
- Renew, but reconsider it more carefully next time
- Downgrade to a lower membership tier, if available
- Not renew
- Not sure
Which of the following membership benefits matter most to you when deciding whether the fee is worth it?
- Access to events and conferences
- Advocacy and representation on issues that affect members
- Member discounts or perks
- Networking opportunities
- Publications, newsletters, or research
- Professional development or certification
- Voting rights or a say in governance
Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's value rating and their answer to the fee-increase question: what specifically makes the membership feel worth it (or not) at the current price, and what would need to change for their rating to go up or down. If they are a lapsed member, focus on what drove them away and what would bring them back. If they said they would not renew after a 10% increase, anchor on what the fee would need to be for them to stay, and which benefit they'd sacrifice to keep costs down.
Which fee structure would feel most fair to you?
- A flat fee for everyone
- Tiered pricing based on income or organization size
- Sliding scale / pay-what-you-can
- Fee based on how much you actually use the benefits
Which category best describes your membership?
- Individual
- Student
- Family/household
- Corporate or organizational
- Prefer not to say
Which age range do you fall into?
- Under 25
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for sharing your perspective! Your responses will directly inform how we set and structure membership fees going forward.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
このテンプレートの設計意図をご紹介します。ほかのアンケートツールには、直接比較できるテンプレートが見つかりませんでした。
ここが違う
- Includes a Van Westendorp price sensitivity question that pinpoints exact dollar thresholds where the fee feels too cheap, a bargain, expensive, or too costly — not just a single satisfaction score
- Pairs an opinion scale value rating and a benefits matrix with an AI follow-up interview that probes why each member gave that rating and how they'd react to a fee increase, surfacing reasoning a static form can't capture
- Uses a MaxDiff exercise to force trade-offs between benefits, showing which perks actually justify the dues rather than relying on unranked checkbox lists
- Tests concrete renewal scenarios (a 10% increase, alternative fee structures) so associations get decision-ready data on where price tolerance breaks down
よくあるご質問
「Membership Fee Value & Pricing Sensitivity Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your thoughts on membership fees! Your honest input helps us set a fair price f…」・「Which best describes your current membership status?」・「Overall, how would you rate the value you get from your membership relative to what you pay in fees?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。