すべてのテンプレート
Pricing & Packaging

Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity & Willingness-to-Pay Survey

Measures acceptable price ranges, perceived value, and purchase intent for consumer products using the Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter. Designed for product managers and pricing researchers evaluating new or existing product pricing strategies.

登録なしでお試し可能・無料プランでも回答数無制限

ライブプレビュー
Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity & Willingness-to-Pay Survey

Welcome to this study on product pricing perceptions. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential, anonymized, and reported only in aggregate for research purposes. This survey takes approximately 12 minutes to complete.

Powered by QuestionPunk

デフォルト テーマ。色とフォントは自由に変更できます。

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全25問・約12分
メッセージ

Welcome to this study on product pricing perceptions. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential, anonymized, and reported only in aggregate for research purposes. This survey takes approximately 12 minutes to complete.

Q01
自由回答(長文)

For this survey, please think of one specific consumer product you might buy soon (e.g., wireless earbuds, an air fryer, a smart thermostat). You will answer all pricing questions about this same product. Please name the specific product you are considering:

Q02
選択式

Have you purchased this type of product in the past 12 months?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
選択式

Why haven't you purchased this type of product recently? Select all that apply.

  • Too expensive
  • Didn't need one
  • Hard to compare options
  • Didn't trust the quality
  • Couldn't find the right features
  • Availability or delivery issues
  • Prefer to spend on other priorities
  • Other (please specify)
Q04
選択式

For this type of product, are you the main purchase decision-maker?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Shared decision
メッセージ

The next four questions ask you to think about different price points for the product you named. Please enter a number in your local currency for each.

Q05
数値

At what price would you consider this product to be so expensive that you would not consider buying it, regardless of its quality? (Enter a number in your local currency.)

Q06
数値

At what price would you consider this product to be so inexpensive that you would question its quality? (Enter a number in your local currency.)

Q07
数値

At what price would you consider this product to be starting to get expensive — not out of the question, but you would need to think carefully before buying? (Enter a number in your local currency.)

Q08
数値

At what price would you consider this product to be a bargain — a great buy for the money? (Enter a number in your local currency.)

Q09
数値

What is the typical price you would expect to pay for this product today? (Enter a number in your local currency.)

Q10
オピニオンスケール

At the typical price you stated, how would you rate the overall value for money of this product?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor value最大:Excellent value
Q11
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to purchase this product at your typical price within the next 30 days?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Extremely unlikely最大:Extremely likely
Q12
オピニオンスケール

How important is build quality and materials when deciding whether to pay more for this product?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q13
オピニオンスケール

How important is brand reputation when deciding whether to pay more for this product?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q14
オピニオンスケール

How important is warranty or after-sales support when deciding whether to pay more for this product?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q15
オピニオンスケール

How important is design and aesthetics when deciding whether to pay more for this product?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q16
オピニオンスケール

How important are unique features not found in alternatives when deciding whether to pay more for this product?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q17
オピニオンスケール

How important are positive reviews and recommendations when deciding whether to pay more for this product?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q18
自由回答(長文)

In a sentence or two, what would clearly justify paying a higher price for this product?

Q19
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your price expectations or how you evaluate value for this type of product?

Q20
AIインタビュー

We'd like to explore your pricing thinking a bit further. Based on the prices you provided, what factors most influenced where you set your upper and lower price limits?

Q21
プルダウン

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
選択式

What is your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
プルダウン

In which country or region do you currently live?

  • United States
  • United Kingdom
  • Canada
  • Australia
  • Germany
  • France
  • India
  • Brazil
  • Japan
  • Mexico
  • South Korea
  • Netherlands
  • Spain
  • Italy
  • Sweden
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
プルダウン

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Some high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college or associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate (Master's/PhD/Professional)
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
選択式

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Unemployed
  • Retired
  • Homemaker
  • Prefer not to say
メッセージ

Thank you for your time. Your responses help us better understand price expectations and value perceptions for consumer products. You may now submit your survey.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Implements the full classic Van Westendorp four-question price battery (too expensive, too cheap, getting expensive, bargain) plus a stated 'typical price' question, so you get both the standard PSM curve inputs and a direct willingness-to-pay anchor.
  • Adds purchase-behavior screening (recent purchase, non-purchase reasons, decision-maker role) so responses can be segmented by whether someone actually buys or decides on this product category.
  • Includes value-driver opinion scales (build quality, brand, warranty, design, unique features, reviews) that let you connect price sensitivity to specific product attributes, not just a bare price curve.
  • Closes with an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes each respondent's own stated prices and value-justification answer, turning static numbers into explained reasoning, alongside auto-generated reporting and transparent prompts you can audit.

Jotform

Price Sensitivity Survey Form Template

A ready-to-use fielding template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, covering core price sensitivity questions. It's a static form with no adaptive questioning logic and relies on Jotform's general form/response analytics rather than research-specific reporting.

優れている点

  • Quick to deploy via a familiar drag-and-drop form builder
  • Easy to customize branding and layout
  • Broad integration ecosystem typical of Jotform

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up probing on individual price answers
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency
  • No built-in per-response quality scoring

SurveySparrow

Price Sensitivity Questionnaire Template

A conversational-style survey template aimed at marketers assessing price sensitivity, presented in SurveySparrow's chat-like UI. It offers a pleasant respondent experience but, like most static templates, doesn't adapt question content based on what a respondent has just said.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-style respondent experience
  • Marketing-oriented template positioning
  • Simple template customization within SurveySparrow's platform

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview or dynamic follow-up questions
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No transparent, inspectable AI prompt logic since there's no AI component

Typeform

Price Sensitivity Survey Template

A polished, conversational-style form template well-suited for a clean respondent experience. It's a fixed-question template without voice or AI interview capabilities, and reporting depends on Typeform's standard results dashboard rather than research-specific auto-generated reports.

優れている点

  • Strong visual design and smooth respondent UX
  • Simple one-question-at-a-time flow
  • Easy embedding and sharing

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI or voice interview follow-up
  • No guided screen-share tasks
  • No per-response quality scoring or research-grade auto-reporting

よくあるご質問

「Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity & Willingness-to-Pay Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が25問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「For this survey, please think of one specific consumer product you might buy soon (e.g., wireless earbuds, an air fryer,…」・「Have you purchased this type of product in the past 12 months?」・「Why haven't you purchased this type of product recently? Select all that apply.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、25問を約12分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る