Mobile App Navigation & Discoverability UX Survey
Measures user expectations and pain points for tab bars, gestures, menus, and feature discoverability in mobile apps. Designed for UX researchers seeking actionable insights to optimize mobile navigation patterns.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
In the last 7 days, how often did you use mobile apps on your phone?
- Multiple times a day
- About once a day
- A few times this week
- Once this week or less
- Not at all
Where do you expect the main tab bar to appear in most apps?
- Bottom of the screen
- Top of the screen
- Floating or hidden until swipe
- No tab bar; navigation in a side menu
Which of the following gestures do you generally expect to work by default in mobile apps? Select all that apply.
- Swipe left/right to switch tabs
- Swipe from the left edge to go back
- Pull down to refresh
- Long-press on a tab to see more
- Double-tap to like or favorite
- Pinch to zoom on images
- Other (please specify)
- None of these
Thinking about the apps you use most, how easy or hard was it to find the app's settings or preferences in the last 30 days?
Overall, how satisfied are you with navigation in the mobile apps you use most?
What is your age group?
- Under 18
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for participating! Your feedback will help improve mobile app navigation experiences. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the study team.
In a typical consumer app, how many main tabs feel ideal?
- 2 or fewer
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6 or more
In the last 30 days, how often did a gesture do something unexpected in any app?
- Never
- 1–2 times
- 3–5 times
- 6–10 times
- More than 10 times
- Not sure
How easy or hard was it to find account or profile information?
How likely are you to recommend the navigation design of your most-used app to a friend or colleague as an example of good UX?
Where do you primarily live?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
For tab items, which presentation do you prefer?
- Icon + text label
- Icon only
- Text label only
- Depends on the context
How easy or hard was it to find a specific feature you knew existed but had to search for?
Describe a recent time (in the last 30 days) when you couldn't find something in an app. What did you try, and what happened?
What is your primary mobile operating system?
- Android
- iOS
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Rank the following from most to least important when it comes to main tab labels and icons.
- Clear wording
- Recognizable icons
- Consistency across screens
- Short labels
- Keeping the number of tabs low
How easy or hard was it to find help or support options?
Based on your earlier responses, we'd like to explore your mobile navigation experiences in a bit more depth.
Do you work in app design, product management, or software development?
- Yes
- No
- Prefer not to say
When a brand-new feature appears in an app, where would you look for it first?
- A new tab in the bar
- The More/… menu
- On the Home screen
- In Search
- Floating action button
- I wait for a prompt or tutorial
Do you regularly use any accessibility features on your phone (e.g., larger text, screen reader, voice control)?
- Yes
- No
- Prefer not to say
Which of the following help you notice a new feature without feeling interrupted? Select all that apply.
- "New" badge on a tab or icon
- A short tooltip or coachmark
- A "What's new" screen after update
- A contextual nudge the first time it's relevant
- Release notes or email
- Other (please specify)
- None of these
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes dedicated opinion-scale questions isolating findability of core features, account/profile info, deep features, and help/support separately, rather than one generic ease-of-use question
- Pairs a ranking question on tab-label priorities with multiple-choice questions on gesture expectations, giving structured signal on both navigation structure and interaction conventions
- Adds an adaptive AI follow-up interview after the scaled and open-text questions to probe the specific recent navigation failure a respondent describes, rather than leaving it as a single unexamined open-text answer
- Includes screening questions on design/product/development background and accessibility feature usage, letting researchers segment results by professional bias and accessibility needs
QuestionPro
Mobile app user experience survey template | Voice of the customer surveysA general mobile app UX/VoC template covering broad satisfaction and usability themes rather than navigation-specific constructs like tab bars, gestures, or feature discoverability. It's framed as a 'voice of the customer' instrument, suggesting a static, ready-to-field questionnaire rather than one built around adaptive probing. Useful as a general baseline but not purpose-built for navigation/discoverability research.
優れている点
- Backed by an established survey platform with broad template library and enterprise research features
- Framed around voice-of-customer methodology, useful for general satisfaction tracking
- Likely offers standard question types and reporting dashboards typical of QuestionPro
物足りない点
- No indication of adaptive AI follow-up questioning tailored to each respondent's specific navigation pain points
- Template is general-purpose mobile app UX, not focused on tab bars, gestures, or discoverability specifically
- No transparent prompt/methodology disclosure or automated per-response quality scoring evident from the page
SurveyMonkey
Mobile App Survey Template & QuestionsA broad mobile app feedback template likely covering general satisfaction, feature ratings, and usage frequency rather than navigation-specific mechanics like tab placement, gesture expectations, or feature discoverability moments. It reads as a standard fixed-question template rather than one incorporating follow-up interviewing. Good for general app feedback collection but not a substitute for a navigation-focused instrument.
優れている点
- Well-known, widely trusted survey platform with strong distribution and analytics tooling
- Template library format makes it quick to launch for general app feedback
- Likely includes standard benchmarking questions common across many apps
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI follow-up to dig into a respondent's specific discoverability struggle
- General mobile app feedback focus, not built around tab bars, gestures, or feature-discovery pathways specifically
- No visible screen-share guided tasks or transparent prompt/methodology disclosure
よくあるご質問
「Mobile App Navigation & Discoverability UX Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が24問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome! This survey explores your expectations for mobile app navigation, gestures, and feature discoverability. It sho…」・「In the last 7 days, how often did you use mobile apps on your phone?」・「Where do you expect the main tab bar to appear in most apps?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、24問を約11分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。