すべてのテンプレート
Market Research

New Market Entry Feasibility & Pricing Survey

Assesses whether a new geography or segment is ready for your offering — measuring category awareness, what people currently use instead, how locked in they are to it, and what they'd expect to pay. An AI follow-up digs into the real switching barrier behind any hesitation, surfacing contract, trust, or workflow obstacles a closed-ended scale would miss.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how you currently handle (Replace with category, e.g., 'expense reporting') and what you'd want from a new option. This takes about 6-7 minutes and helps shape whether and how we enter your market.

Q02
選択式必須

Before today, had you heard of (Replace with your brand/product name)? (Template note: replace with the specific brand being tested for this market.)

  • Never heard of it
  • Heard the name but know little
  • Somewhat familiar
  • Very familiar, know what it does
Q03
選択式必須

What do you currently use to handle (Replace with the job-to-be-done, e.g., 'cross-border payments')?

  • (Replace with Competitor A)
  • (Replace with Competitor B)
  • (Replace with Competitor C)
  • In-house / manual process
  • A generic tool not built for this
  • We don't currently address this need
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

In the last 3 months, how well has your current approach met your needs?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Falls far short最大:Meets needs completely
Q05
ランク付け必須

Rank these factors by how much they'd influence your choice of a solution in this category (top = most influential).

  1. Price
  2. Ease of switching / setup time
  3. Reliability or accuracy
  4. Customer support
  5. Integration with tools we already use
  6. Brand trust / reputation
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q06
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to switch away from your current approach in the next 12 months, regardless of what replaces it?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q07
AIインタビュー

Probe the real barrier behind their switching likelihood score. If low, find out whether it's contract lock-in, cost of change, distrust of new entrants, lack of a compelling alternative, or something else — anchor on their current approach named earlier. If high, find out what would need to be true for them to actually pull the trigger, and whether they've looked at alternatives already. If they mention a specific past bad experience switching tools, ask what happened.

Q08
価格感度分析(Van Westendorp)必須

Now think about a new solution like this one for (Replace with category).

  • At what monthly price would this be so cheap you'd question its quality or reliability?
  • At what monthly price would this be a bargain — great value for the money?
  • At what monthly price would this start to feel expensive, though you'd still consider it?
  • At what monthly price would this be so expensive you would not consider it at all?
Q09
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about a new entrant in this category?

5行 × 5列
  • I'd trust a new provider to protect my data
  • Switching providers would disrupt my day-to-day work
  • I'd need approval from others before switching
  • A new option would need to be noticeably cheaper to win my business
  • I'm open to trying a newer, less established provider
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q10
オピニオンスケール必須

Based on what you know so far, how likely would you be to try (Replace with brand/product name) if it launched in your market?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q11
選択式

Which best describes your organization's size?

  • 1-10 employees
  • 11-50 employees
  • 51-200 employees
  • 201-1000 employees
  • 1000+ employees
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

Which region best describes where you're based?

  • (Replace with Region A)
  • (Replace with Region B)
  • (Replace with Region C)
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you! Your answers will feed directly into our market entry and pricing analysis for this region, alongside responses from others in your industry.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Combines behavioral questions (current tool, switching likelihood, lock-in) with Van Westendorp pricing analysis and a ranking exercise, so both willingness-to-pay and decision drivers are captured in one flow
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview step that adaptively probes the real barrier behind a low switching-likelihood score — surfacing contract, trust, or workflow objections a static scale can't reach
  • Segments respondents by org size and region up front, so feasibility signals can be cut by the market slices that matter for a go/no-go call
  • Closes with an automated report positioned to feed directly into a market-entry decision, rather than leaving raw scale data for manual analysis

Typeform

Market Segmentation Survey Template

A general-purpose market segmentation template aimed at grouping respondents by demographics and needs rather than testing entry feasibility or pricing for a specific offering. It's a fielding-ready static form with Typeform's usual conversational UI, but it doesn't include a pricing module or a mechanism for digging into why someone would or wouldn't switch. Useful as a segmentation starting point, but a team would need to build out pricing and switching-barrier questions themselves.

優れている点

  • Clean, well-tested Typeform UI known for high completion rates
  • Ready-to-use template that can be launched quickly without custom build
  • Good for basic demographic/needs-based segmentation

物足りない点

  • No adaptive follow-up — all questions are fixed at design time, so nuanced switching-barrier reasons go uncaptured
  • No built-in pricing methodology (e.g., Van Westendorp) for feasibility/pricing decisions
  • No published scoring or quality-check methodology for responses

QuestionPro

Supermarket Shopping Attitudes Survey Template

This is a category-specific attitudes survey about supermarket shopping behavior, not a general new-market-entry or pricing feasibility instrument — it's included as the closest comparable QuestionPro offers for consumer market research. It's a static, fielding-ready questionnaire covering shopping habits and preferences, but it isn't structured around testing a new offering's viability or price point in a new segment. Teams evaluating true market entry would need a different template or heavy customization.

優れている点

  • Ready-made questionnaire covering shopping attitudes and habits
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform and analytics tools
  • Easy to deploy for descriptive consumer research

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI probing — follow-up depth depends entirely on pre-written branching logic, not real-time reasoning
  • No pricing-sensitivity methodology built in for feasibility/pricing decisions
  • No transparent, publishable prompt logic since there's no AI interview component

よくあるご質問

「New Market Entry Feasibility & Pricing Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how you currently handle (Replace with category, e.g., 'expense reporting') and…」・「Before today, had you heard of (Replace with your brand/product name)? (Template note: replace with the specific brand b…」・「What do you currently use to handle (Replace with the job-to-be-done, e.g., 'cross-border payments')?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る