すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

New Product Market Demand & Pricing Study

A flexible market study for testing demand, pricing, and competitive positioning for a new or improved product/service. Covers current alternatives, feature priorities, price sensitivity, and purchase intent, with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the real reasons behind stated purchase likelihood and price reactions.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全14問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking part in this market study! We're trying to understand how people like you currently solve a problem, what you'd pay for a better solution, and what would make you switch. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. It's about 8 minutes, and there are no wrong answers.

Q02
選択式必須

Which of the following best describes how you currently address (Replace with the need or problem area, e.g. 'tracking business expenses')?

  • A dedicated product or service built for this
  • A workaround using tools not built for this (e.g. spreadsheets)
  • I pay someone else to handle it for me
  • I don't currently address this at all
Q03
自由回答(短文)

What specific product, service, or brand do you use most for this today, if any? (Template note: adjust this question if your category has no obvious 'current solution', e.g. brand-new markets.)

Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

Thinking about your current solution, how well does it meet your needs?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Falls very short of my needs最大:Fully meets my needs
Q05
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)必須

Which of these matter most, and least, when you're choosing a solution in this space?

  • (Replace with feature/benefit A, e.g. 'Lower price')
  • (Replace with feature/benefit B, e.g. 'Faster setup')
  • (Replace with feature/benefit C, e.g. 'Better customer support')
  • (Replace with feature/benefit D, e.g. 'More reliable performance')
  • (Replace with feature/benefit E, e.g. 'Easier to use')
  • (Replace with feature/benefit F, e.g. 'Strong brand reputation')
  • (Replace with feature/benefit G, e.g. 'Works with tools I already use')
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most to me最も悪い:Matters least to me
Q06
価格感度分析(Van Westendorp)必須

Pricing questions for (Replace with product/service name)

  • At what price would you consider (Replace with product/service name) to be priced so low that you'd question its quality?
  • At what price would you consider (Replace with product/service name) to be a bargain — a great value for the money?
  • At what price would you consider (Replace with product/service name) starting to get expensive, though you'd still consider it?
  • At what price would you consider (Replace with product/service name) too expensive to consider buying?
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to try (Replace with product/service name) once it's available?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q08
AIインタビュー

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's purchase-likelihood score. If they scored high, find out what specifically convinced them and whether that holds up against their current solution and the prices they gave earlier. If they scored low or moderate, dig into the exact hesitation — is it price, trust, switching effort, or lack of a compelling reason to change — and ask what single change would move them higher. Reference the feature they ranked as mattering most and check whether the concept actually delivers on it.

Q09
マトリクス必須

How important is each of the following when you decide whether to buy a product or service like this?

6行 × 5列
  • Price
  • Quality or reliability
  • Brand reputation
  • Customer support
  • Ease of use
  • ほか1件
列: Not important · Slightly important · Important · Very important · Critical
Q10
選択式

Which of the following brands have you heard of? (Template note: replace with your actual competitor set before launching.)

  • (Replace with competitor A)
  • (Replace with competitor B)
  • (Replace with competitor C)
  • (Replace with competitor D)
Q11
選択式

Where would you prefer to purchase (Replace with product/service category)?

  • Directly from the brand's website
  • A physical retail store
  • An online marketplace (e.g. Amazon)
  • Through a sales representative
  • Through a partner or reseller
Q12
選択式

Which age range are you in?

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

Which best describes your annual household income? (Template note: swap for company size/revenue if this is a B2B study.)

  • Under $30,000
  • $30,000-$59,999
  • $60,000-$99,999
  • $100,000-$149,999
  • $150,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you! Your responses will be combined with others to shape pricing, positioning, and product decisions. Individual answers are never shared on their own.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond a single price question with a full Van Westendorp pricing set alongside a purchase-intent scale, so you get both the 'right price' range and stated likelihood to buy.
  • Pairs a MaxDiff feature-priority exercise and an importance matrix so you know which product attributes actually drive the buy decision, not just which features people like.
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that specifically probes why someone gave the purchase-likelihood score they did — surfacing real objections or triggers that a static price/intent question can't capture.
  • Covers the full decision context in one flow — current alternatives, brand awareness, purchase channel preference, and demographics — so pricing and demand findings can be segmented immediately.

SurveyMonkey

Market Research Product Survey Questions

A fielding-ready template for general product market research, likely covering awareness, usage, and satisfaction-style questions. It's a solid generalist starting point but is not built specifically around pricing sensitivity or new-product demand testing. Question set is presumably static and requires manual editing to fit a specific product concept.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use template backed by an established survey platform
  • Broad applicability across many product categories
  • Simple to launch quickly for general feedback

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — respondents can't be probed further on their answers
  • No dedicated pricing methodology like Van Westendorp or price-sensitivity trade-off questions apparent from the title
  • No transparent, auto-generated per-response quality scoring or published prompt methodology

SurveySparrow

Product-Market Fit Survey Template

A standard PMF survey template, likely centered on the classic 'how disappointed would you be' fit question and related satisfaction/usage items. It's oriented toward validating fit for an existing product rather than testing pricing and demand for a new concept. Appears to be a fixed-question template rather than an adaptive interview.

優れている点

  • Focused specifically on product-market fit measurement
  • Likely quick to deploy with a conversational survey UI
  • Good for existing-product validation use cases

物足りない点

  • No visible pricing-sensitivity instrument (e.g., Van Westendorp) for new-product pricing studies
  • Static question flow — no AI-driven follow-up to dig into the 'why' behind fit or price reactions
  • No mention of automated quality scoring or transparent AI methodology

Typeform

Product-Market Fit (PMF) Survey Template

Typeform's PMF template offers a polished, conversational question flow typical of the platform, aimed at gauging how essential a product feels to current users. It's a fixed-form template best suited to validating an existing product's fit, not to competitive pricing or new-product demand testing. No adaptive questioning is indicated.

優れている点

  • Clean, conversational form design typical of Typeform
  • Purpose-built for the well-known PMF survey framework
  • Easy to customize branding and basic question wording

物足りない点

  • No apparent pricing or willingness-to-pay questions for new-product demand testing
  • No adaptive AI interview to explore reasoning behind responses — all questions are pre-set
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt transparency

よくあるご質問

「New Product Market Demand & Pricing Study」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking part in this market study! We're trying to understand how people like you currently solve a problem, w…」・「Which of the following best describes how you currently address (Replace with the need or problem area, e.g. 'tracking b…」・「What specific product, service, or brand do you use most for this today, if any? (Template note: adjust this question if…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る