Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートEducation & Academic
Pet Training Program Progress & Satisfaction Survey
Measures how well a training class, private trainer, or app actually changed a pet's behavior — covering goals worked on, progress made, and satisfaction with instruction. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behavior clicked (or didn't) and what got in the way, for trainers and pet-training platforms who want more than a star rating.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全13問・約7分
Q02
選択式必須
What type of training have you done with your pet in the last 6 months?
- In-person group class
- Private one-on-one training
- Online course or app
- Self-taught with books/videos
- None yet, still deciding
Q03
選択式必須
Which behaviors were you primarily working on? Select all that apply.
- Basic obedience (sit, stay, down)
- Leash walking
- House training
- Separation anxiety
- Aggression or reactivity
- Socialization with people/other pets
- Tricks or mental enrichment
Q04
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須
When you started, which of these mattered most to you — and which mattered least?
- Walking calmly on a leash
- Coming when called
- Reducing excessive barking
- Stopping jumping on people
- Staying calm around other dogs
- Reducing separation anxiety
- Mastering basic obedience cues
- House training reliability
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Mattered most to me最も悪い:Mattered least to me
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須
Since starting training, how much progress have you seen in your pet's behavior?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No progress at all最大:Completely transformed
Q06
マトリクス必須
How much do you agree with each statement about your training experience?
4行 × 5列
- Instructions were easy to understand and follow
- The trainer/program was patient and encouraging
- The pace matched my pet's ability to learn
- I received enough support between sessions
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
評価スケール必須
How would you rate (Replace with trainer/program name)'s communication and responsiveness? (Template note: insert the specific trainer, class, or app name before launching.)
範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q08
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely are you to recommend (Replace with trainer/program name) to another pet owner with similar training needs?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q09
AIインタビュー
Reconstruct a specific moment when the respondent's pet's behavior did or didn't change — anchor on the goal they rated as mattering most and the progress score they gave. Ask what the training actually looked like in practice, what worked, and what got in the way if progress was low. If they gave a high recommend score, probe what specifically made the difference; if low or middling, probe what they wish had been different and whether they'd try a different approach next.
Q10
自由回答（短文）
What's the one thing that would have made your training experience better?
Q11
選択式
What type of pet did you train?
- Dog
- Cat
- Other small pet
- Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式
Which best describes you as a pet owner?
- First-time pet owner
- Experienced with multiple pets over the years
- Work professionally with animals
- Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ
That's everything — thank you! Your answers will be used to improve training curriculum and coaching, and shared with the training team to shape future sessions.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Goes beyond a single satisfaction score by first mapping the specific behaviors and goals worked on (obedience, leash manners, aggression, etc.) and rating actual progress, not just program happiness
- An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the specific moment the pet's behavior did or didn't click and what got in the way — something no static form can probe
- Includes a MaxDiff to surface what mattered most vs. least when the owner started training, plus a matrix and rating block for trainer communication/responsiveness and recommendation likelihood
- Closes with an open text question on what would have made the experience better and auto-generates a report trainers/platforms can act on, with transparent, inspectable AI prompts
Jotform
Training Satisfaction Survey Form TemplateA generic, ready-to-field training satisfaction form built for classes/courses in general, not pet training specifically — questions would need heavy customization to fit pet owners, behaviors, or trainer-specific context. It's a static form builder template, easy to deploy and embed but not tailored to this niche.
優れている点
- Ready-to-use, easily customizable form builder template
- Simple deployment via Jotform's widely used form platform
- Flexible for many generic training/course contexts
物足りない点
- Not built for pet training — no behavior-goal, species, or owner-type framing out of the box
- Static question set only; no adaptive follow-up to probe why progress happened or stalled
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated respondent-level reports
Typeform
Training Satisfaction Survey TemplateA polished, conversational-style satisfaction survey aimed at general training/course contexts rather than pet training. Typeform's format is good for completion rates and simple UX, but the template itself is generic and would need to be rebuilt for pet-specific goals and behaviors.
優れている点
- Clean, conversational UI known to boost completion rates
- Easy to customize question flow and branding
- Good for quick pulse-style satisfaction checks
物足りない点
- Generic training template, not adapted for pet behavior or owner-type segmentation
- No adaptive AI interview to dig into specific behavior-change moments
- No built-in per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report
SurveyMonkey
Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback GuideThis is a course-evaluation guide/template aimed at corporate or classroom training evaluation, not pet training — it reads partly as an educational guide alongside a template rather than a purpose-built fielding tool for this niche. Useful as a general benchmark for structure (goals, satisfaction, instructor rating) but requires full rebuilding for pet-owner context.
優れている点
- Well-established survey platform with strong analytics/reporting dashboard
- Guide-style content helps less experienced survey writers structure questions
- Familiar Likert/rating question types for instructor and content evaluation
物足りない点
- Framed around course/classroom evaluation, not pet-specific behaviors, species, or owner types
- No adaptive or voice AI interview component to probe specific behavior-change moments
- No transparent AI prompts or automated quality scoring of open responses
よくあるご質問
「Pet Training Program Progress & Satisfaction Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your pet training experience! This helps trainers and program creators und…」・「What type of training have you done with your pet in the last 6 months?」・「Which behaviors were you primarily working on? Select all that apply.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。