QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Employee & HR

Post-Training Course Effectiveness Evaluation

Measures training course quality across content relevance, instructor delivery, engagement, and materials. Designed for L&D teams seeking actionable feedback to improve future training programs.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全19問・約9分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to the Post-Training Course Evaluation. This short survey takes approximately 9 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we simply want your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve future training programs. Please click 'Next' to begin.

Q02
選択式

Was this training course required or optional for you?

  • Required
  • Optional
  • Not sure
Q03
評価スケール

Overall, how would you rate this training course?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q04
オピニオンスケール

How effective was the instructor in explaining the material?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all effective最大:Extremely effective
Q05
選択式

Which area of this course needs the most improvement?

  • Pace of delivery
  • Depth of content
  • Real-world examples
  • Practice exercises
  • Materials and slides
  • Scheduling or timing
  • None — no improvements needed
  • Other (please specify)
Q06
プルダウン

What best describes your primary role?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Executive / Senior leader
  • Educator / Trainer
  • Student / Intern
  • Other (please specify)
Q07
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this evaluation. Your feedback is valuable and will be used to improve future training programs. You may now close this window.

Q08
オピニオンスケール

Before taking this course, how familiar were you with the subject matter?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all familiar最大:Extremely familiar
Q09
オピニオンスケール

How relevant was the course content to your current role or responsibilities?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all relevant最大:Extremely relevant
Q10
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the quality of the training materials (slides, handouts, resources)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q11
自由回答（長文）

If you could change one thing about this course, what would it be?

Q12
プルダウン

How many years of experience do you have in this subject area?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–3 years
  • 4–6 years
  • 7–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q13
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to recommend this course to a colleague?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q14
オピニオンスケール

How appropriate was the pace of the course?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Far too slow最大:Far too fast
Q15
AIインタビュー

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about your training experience. Our AI assistant may ask a brief follow-up question to better understand your perspective.

Q16
プルダウン

Approximately how long was the training session you attended?

  • Less than 1 hour
  • 1–2 hours
  • 2–4 hours
  • More than 4 hours
Q17
オピニオンスケール

How engaging were the hands-on exercises or activities?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all engaging最大:Extremely engaging
Q18
選択式

Which single aspect of the course was most helpful to you?

  • Content relevance
  • Level of engagement
  • Pace of material
  • Instructor effectiveness
  • Hands-on exercises
  • Training materials/resources
  • Other (please specify)
Q19
自由回答（長文）

Which specific topics or modules did you find most valuable?

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Combines structured rating and opinion-scale questions (content relevance, instructor delivery, materials quality, pacing, engagement) with open-text questions for specific topics and improvement suggestions
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview question that lets respondents elaborate on their survey answers in their own words, going beyond fixed-choice or single open-text fields
  • Segments results by role, experience level, and training duration via dropdown questions, plus captures required-vs-optional context, enabling more precise reporting for L&D teams
  • Every question and AI prompt is transparent and auditable, and results roll up into an auto-generated report — no manual tallying of open-ends required

SurveyMonkey

Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback Guide

This is a standard static survey template covering common training evaluation questions, backed by SurveyMonkey's mature survey infrastructure and analytics. It's a fielding-ready template, but like most SurveyMonkey templates it relies on fixed question sets rather than adaptive questioning. No academic or nonprofit discount is mentioned on this page.

優れている点

  • Well-established survey platform with broad question-type support and reporting tools
  • Template is ready to deploy quickly with minimal setup
  • Large user base means the question set is likely well field-tested

物足りない点

  • Static question list with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual responses
  • No mention of voice-based interviewing or guided screen-share tasks
  • No published methodology on how question wording or scoring was derived

SurveySparrow

Training Course Evaluation Survey Template | Measure Effectiveness

A conversational-style survey template aimed at measuring training effectiveness, consistent with SurveySparrow's chat-like UI. It appears to be a ready-to-use template rather than a guide, but the conversational format is templated logic, not true adaptive AI interviewing. No per-response automated quality scoring is indicated.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-style survey format that may improve completion rates
  • Positioned specifically for measuring training/course effectiveness
  • Part of a broader survey platform with logic and branching features

物足りない点

  • Conversational UI is templated, not adaptive AI-driven follow-up based on response content
  • No indication of voice AI interviews or screen-share guided tasks
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt disclosure mentioned

QuestionPro

Course evaluation & improvement survey questions + Sample questionnaire template

This page presents a sample questionnaire and question bank for course evaluation, functioning more like a question-reference guide than a single deployable template. It's useful for drafting custom surveys but requires assembly rather than one-click fielding. No adaptive interviewing or AI-driven follow-up is described.

優れている点

  • Broad library of sample questions covering many course-evaluation angles
  • Backed by an established enterprise survey platform with analytics
  • Useful as a reference for building a custom questionnaire

物足りない点

  • Presented as a sample question bank/guide rather than a ready-to-field template
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interviewing or voice AI interview option
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring mentioned

よくあるご質問

「Post-Training Course Effectiveness Evaluation」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が19問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome to the Post-Training Course Evaluation. This short survey takes approximately 9 minutes to complete. Your partic…」・「Was this training course required or optional for you?」・「Overall, how would you rate this training course?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、19問を約9分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Employee & HR

Employee Engagement, Satisfaction & eNPS Survey

Measures employee job satisfaction, workplace engagement, retention intent, and eNPS to help HR and leadership teams identify drivers of morale and areas for improvement.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Employee Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether recent training actually changed what employees can do on the job — covering content quality, format preferences, and topic priorities — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasons behind low preparedness scores instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Post-Training Session Feedback & Impact Survey

Captures how a training session landed — content quality, trainer effectiveness, and confidence applying new skills — for L&D teams and instructors. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind the recommendation score: what specifically helped or blocked people from using what they learned.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Online Training Course Feedback Survey

Captures how learners actually experienced an online training course — completion, content quality, instructor clarity, and confidence applying the material — for L&D teams and course designers. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real obstacles behind low satisfaction or recommendation scores instead of settling for a bare number.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Compliance Training Effectiveness & Retention Survey

Evaluates clarity, engagement, knowledge retention, and on-the-job application of mandatory compliance training to help L&D and compliance teams identify content gaps and optimize delivery formats.

テンプレートを見る