Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートEvents & Community
Seminar Feedback and Attendee Profile Survey
Captures how attendees rated the seminar's content, speakers, and logistics, alongside who they are professionally — with an AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind their overall rating so organizers know exactly what to fix or repeat next time.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全12問・約7分
Q02
選択式
How did you hear about this seminar?
- Email invitation
- Colleague or word of mouth
- Social media
- Company website
- Search engine
- Other
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須
Overall, how would you rate this seminar?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q04
マトリクス必須
Please rate each aspect of the seminar.
5行 × 5列
- Relevance of content to your work
- Speaker knowledge and delivery
- Quality of materials/handouts
- Venue and logistics
- Opportunities for Q&A or interaction
列: Poor · Below Average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
選択式
Which session or topic did you find most valuable? (Template note: replace with your actual session list before launching.)
- Session A (Replace with topic)
- Session B (Replace with topic)
- Session C (Replace with topic)
- None stood out
Q06
評価スケール必須
How would you rate the seminar's pacing and length?
範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Too rushed / too long最大:Just right
Q07
AIインタビュー
Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's overall seminar rating, anchoring on the specific score they gave. If it was high, find out which single moment or session made it feel worthwhile and whether they'd act on what they learned. If it was middling or low, dig into what specifically fell short (content, speaker, pacing, or logistics) and what one change would have moved their rating up. If they flagged a weak-rated aspect in the matrix above, ask them to describe a concrete example.
Q08
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely are you to attend another seminar from us in the next year?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q09
自由回答（長文）
What topics or speakers would you like to see at future seminars?
Q10
プルダウン
What is your primary job function?
- Marketing
- Sales
- Product/Engineering
- Operations
- HR/People
- Finance
- Executive/Leadership
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式
How many years of experience do you have in this field?
- Less than 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 4-9 years
- 10+ years
- Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ
Thank you for sharing your feedback! Your responses will be compiled into a report the organizing team uses to shape the content, speakers, and format of our next seminar.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Combines seminar experience ratings (overall, matrix of aspects, pacing/length) with attendee profiling (job function, years of experience) in one flow, so organizers see both what happened and who it happened to.
- An AI follow-up interview automatically probes the reasoning behind each respondent's overall rating, surfacing the 'why' instead of leaving organizers to guess from a number.
- Open-ended input on desired future topics/speakers plus a likelihood-to-return question gives forward-looking, actionable data, not just a retrospective scorecard.
- Auto-generated reports turn the ratings, profile data, and AI-probed reasoning into a ready-to-share summary for stakeholders, without manual compilation.
QuestionPro
Seminar feedback & attendee information survey questions + Sample questionnaire templateThis page pairs a sample questionnaire with guidance on seminar feedback and attendee information questions, similar in scope to our combined ratings-plus-profile approach. It reads as a reference template/question bank rather than a single fielding-ready flow with built-in follow-up logic. QuestionPro is a full-featured survey platform, but this specific asset is oriented toward question examples and structure rather than adaptive probing.
優れている点
- Covers both seminar quality and attendee demographic questions in one template concept
- Backed by a mature enterprise survey platform with broad question-type support
- Includes sample questionnaire language useful as a starting point
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind a rating — respondents just answer fixed questions
- No mention of automated per-response quality scoring or voice AI interviews
- Presented as a template/guide reference rather than a ready-to-launch interview-style survey
Jotform
Seminar Feedback Form TemplateJotform offers a drag-and-drop seminar feedback form template, easy to customize with its form builder and widgets. It's a static, fielding-ready form focused on quick feedback collection rather than deep qualitative follow-up. Good for basic satisfaction capture, but it doesn't dynamically explore why an attendee gave a particular rating.
優れている点
- Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's builder
- Ready-to-use, fielding-ready form for quick deployment
- Wide integration ecosystem typical of Jotform's platform
物足りない点
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe the reasoning behind ratings
- No voice AI interview option or automated per-response quality scoring
- No transparent, published interview prompts since there's no AI interviewing component
SurveySparrow
Online Seminar Feedback Form TemplateSurveySparrow's template presents seminar feedback in its signature conversational, one-question-at-a-time format, which improves completion feel versus a traditional form. It's still a pre-set question sequence rather than an AI-driven interview that adapts based on what the respondent actually says. Useful for a friendlier UX, but the depth of follow-up is limited to whatever branching logic is manually configured.
優れている点
- Conversational, chat-like survey experience that can boost engagement
- Fielding-ready template designed specifically for education/seminar contexts
- Supports standard logic and branching within its conversational format
物足りない点
- No true adaptive AI follow-up interview that reasons about the respondent's overall rating in real time
- No voice AI interview mode or automated quality scoring of individual responses
- Any follow-up logic is pre-scripted rather than generated dynamically from respondent answers
Typeform
Free Seminar Feedback Form TemplateTypeform's free template offers its well-known conversational, visually polished form experience for seminar feedback. It's a static template with optional logic jumps, well suited for straightforward satisfaction and ratings capture. It does not include AI-driven interviewing to explore the reasoning behind responses.
優れている点
- Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI
- Free to use as a starting template
- Supports basic conditional logic for branching within the form
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into why a respondent rated the seminar the way they did
- No voice AI interview capability or automated per-response quality scoring
- No published, transparent AI prompt methodology since there's no AI interviewing component
よくあるご質問
「Seminar Feedback and Attendee Profile Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for attending (Replace with seminar name)! We'd love your honest feedback to help us improve future sessions. You…」・「How did you hear about this seminar?」・「Overall, how would you rate this seminar?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。