QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Sex Education Program Effectiveness & Gaps Survey

Evaluates how comprehensive, comfortable, and useful a sex education program felt to students or recent graduates — covering which topics were actually taught, how comfortable people felt asking questions, and where they turned when information was missing. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific moment where the curriculum fell short, going deeper than a topic checklist.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on the sex education you received. Your honest answers help us see what's working and what's missing — this takes about 5 minutes and all responses are confidential.

Q02
選択式必須

Where did most of your formal sex education come from?

  • A school health or biology class
  • A dedicated sex ed course
  • A community or religious program
  • Homeschool curriculum
  • I didn't receive formal sex education
Q03
マトリクス必須

For each topic, how much did your sex education actually cover it?

7行 × 3列
  • Anatomy & puberty
  • Consent & boundaries
  • Contraception options
  • STI/STD prevention & testing
  • Healthy relationship & communication skills
  • ほか2件
列: Not covered · Briefly mentioned · Covered in depth
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

How comfortable did you feel asking questions during your sex education instruction?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Very uncomfortable最大:Very comfortable
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

How well did your sex education prepare you to make informed decisions in real situations?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not prepared at all最大:Extremely well prepared
Q06
選択式

When your formal sex education left gaps, where did you go for answers?

  • Parent or guardian
  • Friends or peers
  • Internet search or social media
  • A doctor or nurse
  • I didn't seek out other information
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these topics most needed more time or depth in your sex education?

  • Consent & boundaries
  • Contraception options
  • STI/STD prevention & testing
  • Healthy relationship & communication skills
  • LGBTQ+ inclusive content
  • Puberty & body changes
  • Online safety & sexting risks
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Needed the most additional coverage最も悪い:Needed the least additional coverage
Q08
評価スケール必須

Overall, how would you rate the quality of the sex education you received?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q09
AIインタビュー

Identify one specific moment or situation where the respondent felt their sex education left them unprepared, confused, or too embarrassed to ask a question — anchor on the lowest-rated topic from their answers if possible. Ask what actually happened, what information they wish they'd had at the time, and how they eventually figured it out. If they say their education was uniformly strong, probe whether any peers seemed to need more support and why.

Q10
メッセージ

Just a couple of quick background questions — these are optional and only used to spot patterns across groups.

Q11
選択式

What is your current age range?

  • 13-15
  • 16-18
  • 19-22
  • 23+
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

Which best describes your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for your candor. Your answers feed into a report on which sex education topics deserve more classroom time and support.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a specific moment where the curriculum fell short, going beyond a static topic checklist
  • Uses a matrix question to map exactly which topics were actually covered, paired with a max-diff question to prioritize which topics most needed more depth
  • Captures comfort asking questions and real-world preparedness separately via two opinion scale questions, plus where students turned when information was missing
  • Closes with an auto-generated report and optional demographic questions (age range, gender identity) framed transparently as optional and for grouping only

QuestionPro

Sex Education Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a direct topical match: a ready-made sex education questionnaire covering awareness and attitudes toward sex ed topics. It reads as a static question list rather than an adaptive interview, so all respondents get the same fixed set of items regardless of their answers. There's no mechanism shown for probing deeper into an individual's specific experience.

優れている点

  • Directly on-topic template for sex education survey research
  • Backed by a large established survey platform with broad question-type library
  • Likely quick to deploy for basic awareness/attitude benchmarking

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific respondent's experience or gap in their education
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No visible automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

よくあるご質問

「Sex Education Program Effectiveness & Gaps Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on the sex education you received. Your honest answers help us see what's wor…」・「Where did most of your formal sex education come from?」・「For each topic, how much did your sex education actually cover it?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

Academic Integrity and Cheating Culture Survey

Measures how common cheating really is, which behaviors students consider acceptable, and what actually drives the decision to cut corners — for schools and departments auditing their academic integrity culture. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the reasoning behind a specific incident instead of settling for a guilt-laden yes/no.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Employee Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether recent training actually changed what employees can do on the job — covering content quality, format preferences, and topic priorities — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasons behind low preparedness scores instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Student Feedback on Teacher Effectiveness Survey

Gathers student feedback on a teacher's clarity, fairness, engagement, and support, plus which qualities matter most to learning. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind each student's overall recommendation score, surfacing concrete examples instead of vague praise or complaints.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Social Studies Course Evaluation Survey

Measures how students experienced a social studies course — material relevance, teaching clarity, discussion quality, and which units actually landed — for teachers, department heads, and curriculum teams reviewing a course after a term. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind students' recommend score and topic preferences instead of stopping at the number.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

High School Teacher Evaluation & Classroom Effectiveness Survey

Gathers student feedback on a teacher's instructional clarity, fairness, availability, and classroom management, then uses an AI follow-up interview to unpack a specific moment behind the overall rating. Built for department chairs, instructional coaches, and school administrators running end-of-term teacher evaluations.

テンプレートを見る