QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Teacher Engagement & Retention Pulse Survey

Measures how engaged, supported, and likely to stay teachers feel — covering workload, recognition, resources, and leadership support — for school and district leaders tracking staff morale. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific reasons behind each teacher's engagement score and their top priority for improvement, surfacing detail no rating scale alone can capture.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全14問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how things are going at school. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest answers help leadership understand what's working and what needs to change — this takes about 8 minutes and your responses matter.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this school as a place to work to another educator?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q03
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about your day-to-day experience at school?

6行 × 5列
  • I feel recognized for the work I do
  • My workload is manageable
  • I have the materials and resources I need to teach effectively
  • My input is considered in decisions that affect my classroom
  • I have real opportunities to grow professionally here
  • ほか1件
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how often did you feel emotionally exhausted by your work by the end of the school day?

  • Never
  • Rarely
  • Sometimes
  • Often
  • Every day
Q05
選択式

In the last 30 days, how often did a supervisor or school leader acknowledge or recognize your work?

  • Never
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Weekly or more
Q06
評価スケール必須

How supported do you feel by school leadership when you raise a classroom or workload concern?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very unsupported最大:Very supported
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these would do the most — and least — to improve your engagement at work?

  • Higher pay or stipends
  • Smaller class sizes
  • More protected planning time
  • More recognition from leadership
  • Better classroom resources and materials
  • More say in school decisions
  • More relevant professional development
  • Less administrative paperwork
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Would improve my engagement the most最も悪い:Would improve my engagement the least
Q08
AIインタビュー

Anchor on the respondent's likelihood-to-recommend score and their top-ranked engagement driver from the trade-off question. Probe the specific incident or pattern behind that score — what's a recent moment that made them feel valued or unsupported — and ask what one change from their top driver would concretely look like in their day-to-day role. If their score is high, ask what would put it at risk; if their score is low, ask what it would take to move it up even two points.

Q09
選択式必須

How likely are you to still be teaching at this school one year from now?

  • Definitely not
  • Probably not
  • Not sure yet
  • Probably yes
  • Definitely yes
Q10
メッセージ

A few quick questions about your role — these help us compare results across grade levels and experience, and are completely optional.

Q11
選択式

Which best describes your role?

  • Classroom teacher
  • Instructional support / paraprofessional
  • Specialist (e.g., counselor, librarian, coach)
  • Other
Q12
選択式

How many years have you worked in education?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8-15 years
  • 16+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

What grade level(s) do you primarily work with?

  • Elementary
  • Middle school
  • High school
  • Multiple levels / district-wide
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for your honesty. Your answers feed directly into a report school leadership will use to address workload, recognition, and support this year.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Pairs quantitative measures (recommend-to-work likelihood, agreement matrix, burnout and recognition frequency, leadership support rating, one-year retention intent) with an AI follow-up interview that anchors on each teacher's own likelihood-to-recommend score and top-ranked priority to dig into the specific 'why' behind it
  • Uses a MaxDiff exercise to force-rank which improvements would most and least move engagement, giving leaders a prioritized action list rather than just averages
  • Collects role, years in education, and grade level so results can be compared across cohorts, all wrapped in a conversational chat-style flow with clear opening and closing messages
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean district and school leaders get a synthesized summary instead of raw spreadsheet exports

Jotform

Teacher Engagement Survey Form Template

A fielding-ready static form template covering core teacher engagement topics, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's easy to customize and embed but relies entirely on fixed questions with no adaptive probing. Good for quick deployment, less suited to uncovering the reasoning behind scores.

優れている点

  • Fielding-ready template usable immediately
  • Flexible form builder for adding/removing questions and branding
  • Familiar, low-friction form format for respondents

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe the 'why' behind each score
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated report synthesis
  • No voice interview option for richer qualitative capture

QuestionPro

Teacher Engagement Survey Template + Sample Questionnaire Template

An enterprise survey platform's teacher engagement template with sample questions and presumably strong analytics/dashboarding for large districts. It's a static questionnaire template rather than an interactive interview, so depth comes from fixed question design rather than dynamic probing. Likely well-suited to organizations already on QuestionPro's broader research suite.

優れている点

  • Backed by an established enterprise survey/research platform
  • Sample questionnaire gives a ready starting structure
  • Likely strong reporting/dashboard tooling for large-scale rollouts

物足りない点

  • Static questionnaire with no adaptive AI follow-up to explore individual reasons behind scores
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No transparent, inspectable AI prompts since there's no AI interview layer

SurveySparrow

Teacher Engagement Survey Template

A conversational-style survey template purpose-built for teacher engagement, which aligns well with QuestionPunk's chat-based format. It likely offers a pleasant respondent experience but remains a fixed-question flow rather than a true adaptive interview. No indication of AI-driven follow-up or automated qualitative analysis.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-like survey UI improves completion experience
  • Template specifically designed for teacher engagement, not generic HR use
  • Part of a platform with broader survey distribution and reporting features

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview that follows up on individual responses
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended answers
  • No auto-generated synthesis report or voice interview option

SurveyMonkey

Employee Engagement Survey Template

A general employee engagement template from a widely used survey platform, not specifically written for K-12 teachers or school leadership contexts. It would need adaptation (workload, recognition, classroom-specific language) to fit a teacher retention use case. Strong for broad benchmarking but generic rather than education-tailored.

優れている点

  • Backed by a well-known, broadly trusted survey platform
  • Likely offers benchmarking data across many industries
  • Simple to deploy and customize for general engagement tracking

物足りない点

  • Not education-specific — lacks teacher/classroom-specific workload and leadership-support framing
  • Static questionnaire with no adaptive AI follow-up interview
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated report tailored to school retention

よくあるご質問

「Teacher Engagement & Retention Pulse Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how things are going at school. Your responses are completely confidential and…」・「How likely are you to recommend this school as a place to work to another educator?」・「How much do you agree with each statement about your day-to-day experience at school?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

Return-to-School Transition Experience Survey

Measures how smoothly students and families experienced the return to school — communication before the first day, logistics, emotional readiness, and stress points — for districts, schools, or PTAs planning next year's transition. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the specific moment things went well or fell apart, beyond a satisfaction score.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Teacher Job Satisfaction & Retention Pulse Survey

Tracks how satisfied teachers are with workload, administrative support, pay, resources, and school culture, and flags retention risk before it shows up in resignation letters. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind each teacher's rating instead of settling for a number. Built for school leaders and district HR running an annual or mid-year staff pulse.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Employee Engagement & Feedback Pulse Survey

Measures how engaged, supported, and likely to stay your employees are — covering manager support, recognition, growth opportunities, and turnover risk — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific reason behind each employee's recommendation score instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Colleague Engagement & Retention Pulse Survey

Measures how motivated, supported, and connected colleagues feel day to day, benchmarks a recommend-to-a-friend engagement score, and identifies which drivers (recognition, growth, workload, manager support) matter most. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind each person's score instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Employee Attitude & Engagement Pulse Survey

Measures how employees feel about their role, manager, and the organization overall — covering recognition, motivation, and intent to stay — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind low or high scores instead of settling for a number. Built for HR teams running regular engagement pulses.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Employee Opinion and Engagement Pulse Survey

Tracks how employees feel about their manager, workload, growth, and the organization overall, then uses an AI follow-up interview to surface the specific reasons behind low or lukewarm scores. Built for HR and people teams running quarterly or annual pulse checks who need both trend data and the 'why' behind it.

テンプレートを見る