QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Teacher Job Satisfaction & Retention Pulse Survey

Tracks how satisfied teachers are with workload, administrative support, pay, resources, and school culture, and flags retention risk before it shows up in resignation letters. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind each teacher's rating instead of settling for a number. Built for school leaders and district HR running an annual or mid-year staff pulse.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how things are really going at school. Your answers are used to improve support for teachers — nothing here is tied to your performance review. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 6 minutes.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how satisfied are you with your job as a teacher right now?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q03
マトリクス必須

How satisfied are you with each of the following aspects of your current role?

7行 × 5列
  • Workload and hours
  • Administrative support
  • Compensation and benefits
  • Availability of teaching materials and resources
  • Professional development opportunities
  • ほか2件
列: Very dissatisfied · Dissatisfied · Neutral · Satisfied · Very satisfied
Q04
選択式必須

In the last month, how often did you have to work outside your contracted hours (grading, planning, or admin tasks) just to keep up?

  • Never
  • A few days a month
  • About once a week
  • Several times a week
  • Almost every day
Q05
評価スケール

The last time you needed help with a classroom or behavioral challenge, how would you rate the support you got from school administration?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:No help at all最大:Extremely helpful
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these changes would do the most to improve your job satisfaction — and which would matter least?

  • Higher pay or better benefits
  • Smaller class sizes
  • More paid planning time
  • More administrative support
  • Better classroom materials and resources
  • A more manageable overall workload
  • More input on curriculum decisions
  • Better mentoring or coaching
  • Improved student behavior support
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Would help the most最も悪い:Would help the least
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend teaching at this school to a colleague looking for a job?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q08
AIインタビュー

Anchor on the respondent's recommend-to-a-colleague score and their workload rating. If the score is low (0-6), get a specific recent example of what made them hesitate — a particular week, incident, or unmet need — and ask what would need to change for that to improve. If the score is high (7-10), find out what specifically is working well so it can be protected or replicated elsewhere. Always probe whether workload or lack of administrative support played a role, and note any mention of considering leaving the profession or the school.

Q09
選択式必須

How likely are you to still be teaching at this school next school year?

  • Very unlikely
  • Somewhat unlikely
  • Not sure
  • Somewhat likely
  • Very likely
Q10
プルダウン

How many years have you been teaching, including this year?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8-15 years
  • More than 15 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

What grade level do you primarily teach?

  • Early childhood / Pre-K
  • Elementary (K-5)
  • Middle school (6-8)
  • High school (9-12)
  • Multiple levels / Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

What is your current employment status?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Long-term substitute
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

Thank you for your honesty — this really helps. Responses are compiled into a school-wide report on teacher support and retention, and no individual answers are shared with your direct supervisor.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond a single satisfaction score by pairing an overall rating with a matrix breakdown of workload, admin support, pay, resources, and culture
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that anchors on each teacher's recommend-to-a-colleague score and workload rating to dig into the actual incident behind a low score, not just the number
  • Uses a max-diff question to force-rank which specific changes would most improve satisfaction, giving school leaders a prioritized action list instead of a vague sentiment score
  • Directly asks retention-signal questions (likelihood to still be teaching next year, recommend-to-a-colleague) alongside tenure and role context, so flight-risk staff can be flagged before a resignation letter

Jotform

Teacher Satisfaction Survey Form Template

A fielding-ready static form template covering standard teacher satisfaction topics, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's easy to customize and deploy quickly but relies on fixed questions rather than any adaptive follow-up. Best suited for teams that want a simple, no-frills satisfaction check rather than deeper diagnostic insight.

優れている点

  • Quick to deploy and customize using a familiar drag-and-drop builder
  • Integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (notifications, storage, integrations)

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to probe the reasoning behind a low rating
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or generated report tying scores to specific incidents

SurveySparrow

Teacher Satisfaction Survey

SurveySparrow's template offers a conversational-style survey format, which makes the experience feel less clinical than a typical form. It covers common satisfaction dimensions but the flow is still pre-scripted rather than dynamically driven by each respondent's answers. Useful for a friendlier survey feel, but not a substitute for a true follow-up interview.

優れている点

  • Conversational chat-style UI that can feel more engaging than a plain form
  • Part of a broader survey platform with reporting and distribution tools

物足りない点

  • Conversational tone does not equate to adaptive AI probing — question sequence is still pre-set, not tailored to each answer
  • No mention of voice AI interviews or guided screen-share tasks for deeper qualitative context

Typeform

Teacher Satisfaction Survey Form

Typeform's template delivers its signature one-question-at-a-time interface, which tends to boost completion rates for straightforward satisfaction surveys. It's a polished, ready-to-field form, but like other form builders it collects static responses without any mechanism to dig deeper into a specific low score. Good for a clean, simple pulse check rather than root-cause analysis.

優れている点

  • Polished, well-known one-question-at-a-time UX that's fast to fill out
  • Easy to launch with minimal setup for a standard satisfaction pulse

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to uncover the specific incident behind a rating
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of individual responses

よくあるご質問

「Teacher Job Satisfaction & Retention Pulse Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how things are really going at school. Your answers are used to improve support…」・「Overall, how satisfied are you with your job as a teacher right now?」・「How satisfied are you with each of the following aspects of your current role?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

Student Interest in Course Topics and Activities Survey

Measures which topics, formats, and learning activities genuinely capture student curiosity versus which ones fall flat, for instructors and instructional designers refining a course or program. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment interest sparked or died, surfacing detail that ratings alone can't reveal.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Teacher Engagement & Retention Pulse Survey

Measures how engaged, supported, and likely to stay teachers feel — covering workload, recognition, resources, and leadership support — for school and district leaders tracking staff morale. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific reasons behind each teacher's engagement score and their top priority for improvement, surfacing detail no rating scale alone can capture.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Employee Satisfaction and Retention Pulse Survey

Tracks overall staff satisfaction, satisfaction across key workplace dimensions, and early flight-risk signals, then uses an AI follow-up interview to uncover the specific reasons behind low scores or turnover intent. Built for HR and people teams running quarterly or annual pulse checks.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Employee Work Satisfaction Pulse Survey

Tracks how satisfied employees are with their job, manager, and growth path, and flags flight risk before it shows up in attrition data. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reason behind each person's lowest-rated area instead of leaving it as an unexplained number.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Employee Job Satisfaction & Engagement Survey

Measures overall job satisfaction, the specific drivers behind it (workload, manager support, growth, recognition, pay, work-life balance), and retention risk — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the real reason behind each employee's satisfaction score instead of just the number. Built for HR teams running quarterly or annual pulse checks.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Employee Happiness & Engagement Pulse Survey

Tracks how happy employees are right now, what's driving or dragging that happiness, and how it connects to retention risk. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each person's happiness rating instead of settling for a number, giving HR teams concrete detail to act on.

テンプレートを見る