すべてのテンプレート
Product & UX

Weekly App & Web Performance Pulse Survey

A recurring pulse survey for collecting structured user feedback on app or website speed, uptime, and error frequency over a 7-day window. Designed for product and engineering teams seeking to prioritize performance improvements and track reliability trends.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全20問・約9分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to our weekly performance feedback survey. This short survey asks about your experience with speed, availability, and errors over the past 7 days. Your participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we're interested in your honest experience. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate to guide performance improvements. Estimated time: 10 minutes.

Q02
選択式

In the last 7 days, on how many days did you use the product?

  • 0 days
  • 1–2 days
  • 3–4 days
  • 5–7 days
Q03
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how fast did the product feel in the last 7 days?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Extremely slow最大:Extremely fast
Q04
選択式

Which best describes the product's availability for you over the last 7 days?

  • No outages; always available
  • Minor slowdowns only
  • One short outage (under 30 minutes)
  • Multiple outages
  • Not sure
Q05
選択式

In the last 7 days, how often did you encounter errors (e.g., crashes, error messages, or failed actions)?

  • Never
  • Once
  • 2–3 times
  • Daily
  • Multiple times per day
Q06
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the product's overall reliability in the last 7 days?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unreliable最大:Very reliable
Q07
AIインタビュー

Based on your responses in this survey, we'd like to explore your recent performance experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.

Q08
プルダウン

What is your primary role?

  • Product management
  • Engineering
  • Design or UX
  • Data or Analytics
  • Customer support or Success
  • Operations
  • Executive or Leadership
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for your time — your feedback directly helps us prioritize performance improvements!

Q10
選択式

Which platform did you primarily use in the last 7 days?

  • iOS app
  • Android app
  • Web browser
  • Desktop application
  • API or integrations
  • Multiple equally
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

In which areas, if any, did you notice slowdowns in the last 7 days? Select all that apply.

  • App start-up
  • Page or screen loads
  • Search
  • Scrolling
  • Navigation between screens
  • Data sync or save
  • Uploads or downloads
  • I didn't notice any slowdowns
Q12
プルダウン

What was the typical length of the outage(s) you experienced?

  • Not applicable — no outages
  • Under 5 minutes
  • 5–15 minutes
  • 15–30 minutes
  • 30–60 minutes
  • Over 1 hour
  • Varied or unsure
Q13
選択式

What types of errors did you encounter? Select all that apply.

  • Not applicable — no errors
  • Crash or freeze
  • Server error or timeout
  • Page not found or access denied
  • Form or input validation error
  • Data sync or merge conflict
  • Payment or billing error
  • Other
Q14
選択式

Compared with the previous week, how would you describe overall performance?

  • Much worse
  • Slightly worse
  • About the same
  • Slightly better
  • Much better
  • Not sure / first week
Q15
プルダウン

How long have you been using this product?

  • Under 1 month
  • 1–6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • 3+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
自由回答(長文)

Please describe a recent moment that felt slow — what were you trying to do, and what happened?

Q17
選択式

When did the outage(s) tend to occur? Select all that apply.

  • Not applicable — no outages
  • Morning
  • Midday or afternoon
  • Evening
  • Overnight
  • Varied or unsure
Q18
プルダウン

Approximately how long did it take to recover from or work around your most recent error?

  • Not applicable — no errors
  • Under 1 minute
  • 1–5 minutes
  • 5–15 minutes
  • 15–30 minutes
  • 30–60 minutes
  • Over 1 hour
  • Could not recover
Q19
ランク付け

Please rank the following areas by improvement priority (drag the most important to the top).

  1. Speed
  2. Uptime or availability
  3. Fewer errors
  4. Stability under load
  5. Sync reliability
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q20
プルダウン

What is your company size?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001+
  • Prefer not to say

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Combines structured multiple-choice, opinion-scale, and dropdown questions on speed, uptime, outages, and error frequency with an open-text question asking users to describe a specific slow moment in detail
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that adaptively explores each respondent's actual answers, going beyond fixed-choice options to surface root causes and context
  • Captures role, tenure, and company size as segmentation fields so product and engineering teams can slice reliability trends by user type
  • Ends with a ranking question so teams get a prioritized, quantifiable list of which performance areas to fix first, not just raw sentiment

Jotform

300+ Performance Tracking Forms

This is a broad category page listing many performance-tracking form templates rather than a single ready-to-field weekly pulse survey for app/web reliability. It's useful as a starting point to pick and customize a static form, but requires manual selection and editing to match a 7-day performance/error/uptime cadence. No indication of adaptive questioning or automated scoring.

優れている点

  • Large library offering many customizable form templates to choose from
  • Jotform's drag-and-drop builder allows easy field customization
  • Likely includes logic/branching features common to Jotform forms

物足りない点

  • A static form library, not a purpose-built recurring performance pulse survey
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interviewing to probe vague or negative responses
  • No visible automated quality scoring or auto-generated reporting on responses

QuestionPro

Website Feedback Survey Template

A ready-to-use template focused on general website feedback (usability, satisfaction, navigation) rather than a recurring 7-day performance/uptime/error tracking pulse. It's relevant to the broader website-feedback space but not structured around speed, outages, and error-recovery time like our template. Good for general UX sentiment, less suited to engineering-focused reliability tracking.

優れている点

  • Pre-built, fielding-ready website feedback template
  • Covers general usability and satisfaction dimensions
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform and analytics

物足りない点

  • No apparent focus on outage duration, error types, or recovery time specific to performance/reliability
  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

よくあるご質問

「Weekly App & Web Performance Pulse Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が20問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to our weekly performance feedback survey. This short survey asks about your experience with speed, availability…」・「In the last 7 days, on how many days did you use the product?」・「Overall, how fast did the product feel in the last 7 days?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、20問を約9分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る