QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Debate Performance Feedback Survey

Captures how judges, audience members, and competitors experienced a specific debate — argument quality, delivery, and persuasiveness — plus an AI follow-up that reconstructs the single moment that most shaped who 'won' the room. Built for debate coaches, tournament organizers, and educators running practice rounds or competitions.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全11問・約6分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this debate! Your feedback helps the debaters improve and helps organizers plan better rounds. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

Which best describes your role at this debate?

  • Judge
  • Audience member
  • Competitor / debater
  • Coach or mentor
  • Other
Q03
マトリクス必須

Rate the debate on each of the following, considering both sides overall:

5行 × 5列
  • Argument clarity
  • Use of evidence
  • Quality of rebuttals
  • Delivery and stage presence
  • Time management
列: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

How persuasive did you find the case made by the side you believe won this debate?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not persuasive at all最大:Completely persuasive
Q05
評価スケール必須

Compared to other debates you've watched or judged, how would you rate this one overall?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Well below average最大:Well above average
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Thinking about the debaters in this round, which skills most need improvement and which are already strongest? Pick the best and worst from each set shown.

  • Argument structure and logic
  • Use of evidence and sources
  • Rebuttal timing and precision
  • Public speaking delivery
  • Cross-examination technique
  • Time management
  • Handling hostile or tough questions
  • Persuasive framing and rhetoric
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Strongest skill shown最も悪い:Most in need of improvement
Q07
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the single moment in this debate that most shaped the respondent's view of who was more convincing — which speaker, which argument or rebuttal, and exactly what made it land or fall flat. If the respondent rated the debate as average or below on quality, probe what specifically was missing (structure, evidence, delivery, or engagement with the other side) rather than accepting a generic complaint.

Q08
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to attend or judge another debate in this series?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q09
自由回答（長文）

Anything else you'd like the debaters or organizers to know — feedback, suggestions, or specific praise?

Q10
選択式

How would you describe your experience level with debate (as a participant, judge, or coach)?

  • New to debate
  • Some experience (a few rounds/events)
  • Experienced (many rounds/seasons)
  • Highly experienced (competitive or professional level)
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
メッセージ

Thank you for your feedback! Responses are compiled into a summary report shared with the debaters and organizers to help sharpen arguments and delivery for next time.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated matrix rating block covering argument quality, delivery, and persuasiveness from multiple respondent types (judges, audience, competitors) in one flow
  • Features an AI follow-up interview question that reconstructs the single moment that most shaped who 'won' the room, going beyond static rating scales
  • Uses a max-diff question to identify which debater skills most need improvement, giving actionable coaching signal rather than just satisfaction scores
  • Auto-generates a summary report shared back with debaters and organizers, closing the feedback loop without manual compilation

SurveySparrow

Debate Platform Survey Form Template for Feedback

This is a genuinely debate-specific fielding-ready template, directly comparable to ours in subject matter. It appears built around standard rating/multiple-choice question types rather than adaptive interviewing. Good baseline option for teams wanting a quick static form rather than deeper qualitative reconstruction of key moments.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for debate feedback rather than generic event feedback
  • Likely quick to deploy with pre-set rating and multiple-choice questions
  • Part of a broader survey platform with standard reporting/export tools

物足りない点

  • No indication of adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe why a respondent felt a certain way
  • No mention of voice AI interviews or guided screen-share tasks for richer debate analysis
  • No published methodology on how responses are scored or weighted

Jotform

Create Free Event Feedback Forms - Event Feedback Form Templates

This is a generic event feedback template category page, not a debate- or competition-specific survey, so it would need heavy customization to capture argument quality, persuasiveness, or judge/audience/competitor role distinctions. It's useful mainly as a broad starting form-builder page rather than a ready-made debate tool. Best suited for organizers who want a general-purpose form and plan to build debate-specific questions from scratch.

優れている点

  • Large library of customizable form templates and drag-and-drop builder
  • Free tier available for basic event feedback collection
  • Familiar form-builder ecosystem with integrations

物足りない点

  • No debate-specific question set (argument quality, persuasiveness, role-based branching) out of the box
  • Static form fields only, no adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview capability
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated performance report

よくあるご質問

「Debate Performance Feedback Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が11問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this debate! Your feedback helps the debaters improve and helps organizers plan bett…」・「Which best describes your role at this debate?」・「Rate the debate on each of the following, considering both sides overall:」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、11問を約6分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Lost and Found Recovery Experience Survey

Measures how well your lost-and-found process works for people who actually lost something on-site — reporting ease, staff helpfulness, and resolution speed — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs exactly what happened during their specific case, especially when the item wasn't recovered.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Presentation Peer Feedback and Skill-Building Survey

Gathers structured, behavior-specific feedback from colleagues who watched a presentation — covering clarity, delivery, visuals, pacing, and Q&A — plus a trade-off ranking of what most needs work. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that stood out, turning vague 'good job' feedback into a concrete example the presenter can act on.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Presentation Evaluation and Audience Feedback Survey

Measures how clearly a presentation landed with its audience — content quality, delivery, pacing, and whether people can actually act on it — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment or gap that shaped each attendee's overall verdict. Built for trainers, conference organizers, and internal comms teams reviewing a specific talk or workshop.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Conference & Webinar Presenter Feedback Survey

Captures how attendees rate a specific speaker or session — clarity, pacing, expertise, and Q&A handling — plus an AI follow-up that digs into the moment that most shaped their opinion. Built for event organizers, training teams, and internal speaker programs who need actionable feedback beyond a star rating.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Post-Presentation Audience Feedback Survey

Captures how a presentation, talk, or webinar landed with its audience — clarity, pacing, relevance, and delivery — for presenters, event teams, and internal comms who want to improve the next session. An AI follow-up digs into the exact moment attention was lost or a point clicked, going beyond generic satisfaction scores.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Conference Session and Speaker Feedback Survey

Captures attendee reactions to a specific session — content depth, speaker delivery, relevance to their work, and preferred formats going forward — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment that shaped their overall rating instead of a generic thumbs up or down.

テンプレートを見る