Education & academic survey templates

A structured pilot review instrument for expert panelists or cognitive interview participants to evaluate draft survey items on clarity, redundancy, response-option quality, and face validity before fielding.

Measures student perceptions of rubric clarity, fairness, and usefulness for learning. Designed for course designers and academic researchers seeking to improve grading transparency and rubric design.

Measures student perceptions of fairness, privacy, and acceptability of proctoring practices in remote exams. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking to evaluate and improve remote assessment policies.

Measures student engagement, satisfaction, perceived learning outcomes, and support needs in online and hybrid courses to guide evidence-based program improvements.

A structured instrument for expert reviewers to evaluate the clarity, completeness, and pre-specification quality of a pre-analysis plan or preregistration draft before data collection begins.

A structured intake instrument for statisticians and researchers to systematically document effect size, variance, design, and attrition assumptions needed to conduct power and sample size calculations.

Assesses whether research participants understood key elements of informed consent—study purpose, risks, data handling, and participant rights. Designed for post-study administration to support IRB compliance and iterative improvement of consent materials.

Measures student perceptions of messaging timeliness, channel preference, and support quality in online or fintech cohort programs to identify actionable communication improvements.

A team-level diagnostic for mixed-methods research projects, evaluating convergence, divergence, and integration rigor across qualitative and quantitative strands to guide analytic next steps.

Measures student awareness, perceived value, enrollment drivers, outcomes, and barriers related to certificates and microcredentials. Designed for higher-education and online-learning researchers seeking actionable segmentation and intent data.

A research-grade instrument for verifying that experimental participants correctly perceived, understood, and interpreted a presented stimulus. Designed for researchers conducting experiments who need to validate manipulation fidelity and comprehension before analyzing dependent variables.

Diagnoses why participants miss or consider skipping follow-up time points in longitudinal research, and identifies actionable levers—reminders, incentives, burden reduction—to improve retention and compliance.

Measures teacher-reported reliability, error frequency, and satisfaction with LMS integrations and single sign-on (SSO) systems. Use this instrument to identify failure points, prioritize fixes, and benchmark integration performance over 30-day recall windows.

Screens prospective research participants for eligibility and verifies comprehension of informed consent elements before enrollment in an academic study.

Measures the quality of institutional internship support, supervision quality, and skill development outcomes to guide program improvement for higher education administrators and career services teams.

Collects structured employer feedback on intern performance, program structure, supervision investment, and organizational outcomes to guide internship program improvements.

A pre-study instrument that verifies participants' understanding of consent information, risks, and withdrawal rights. Designed for IRB compliance and suitable for any human subjects research protocol.

Measures educators' AI tool usage patterns, institutional policy clarity, observed classroom outcomes, and support needs to inform evidence-based AI integration strategies across K-12 and higher education contexts.

Measures student perceptions of financial aid application clarity, fairness, and support quality. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking actionable feedback from applicants and non-applicants within the past 12 months.

Measures awareness decay of recently launched features across user segments, identifying which communication channels sustain visibility and where messaging drop-offs occur post-launch.

Measures student attitudes toward AI tool usage in academic settings, integrity concerns, and preferred institutional safeguards. Designed for higher-education administrators and faculty seeking data to inform responsible AI-use policies.

Collects structured student feedback on instructor effectiveness, course materials, workload balance, and learning outcomes to inform end-of-term course improvements at the undergraduate or graduate level.

A structured end-of-term evaluation measuring student perceptions of instruction quality, course materials, workload, and pace. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking actionable feedback to improve course design and teaching effectiveness.

Evaluates students' capstone project experiences—including mentorship quality, resource availability, skill development, and key challenges—to inform data-driven program improvement decisions.

Measures student perceptions of campus safety, emergency communication effectiveness, and awareness of support resources to inform institutional safety planning and resource allocation.

Measures current students' and recent graduates' connection to their institution, giving likelihood and motivations, barriers to donation, and communication preferences to inform alumni relations and advancement strategy.

Measures student perceptions of application requirements, deadlines, and status communications across admissions, enrollment, and financial-aid processes. Use insights to identify friction points and improve institutional communication.

Measures adjunct and part-time instructor satisfaction across pay equity, institutional support, teaching resources, and scheduling predictability. Designed for higher education administrators seeking actionable data to improve adjunct working conditions.

Measures student awareness of academic integrity policies, perceived peer norms around misconduct, and views on institutional interventions. Designed for education administrators and researchers seeking actionable data to strengthen integrity culture.

Measures student satisfaction, perceived quality, and outcomes after academic advising sessions. Designed for institutional advising offices seeking actionable feedback to improve service delivery.

Measures employee perceptions of productivity, well-being, collaboration, and engagement across remote, hybrid, and in-office arrangements. Use this instrument to identify burnout risk factors and inform flexible-work policy decisions.